Hill's Adult Light Dog Food

Wet Pate · complete

Adult Light Dog Food
Poor
our rating

Our verdict

Is Hill's Adult Light Dog Food a good dog food?

We score it 23/100 (Poor). The main reasons are set out in "Why you might not" below, and every step of the calculation is shown under "How we calculated this score".

Complete wet paté food for adult dogs, with meat and animal derivatives, cereals and vegetable by as the main ingredients.

How we score

100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

Why you might choose it

  • Low in fat for its format: 10% fat on a dry-matter basis.
  • Declares energy content, which most labels omit.
  • Nutritionally complete: formulated to be fed as the whole diet.

Why you might not

  • 6 poor-graded ingredients make up about 88% of the recipe.
  • Meat makes up an estimated 7% of the dry matter (18% as fed); carbohydrates dominate.
  • 100% of the recipe mass has no printed percentage, so the exact split cannot be verified.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
  • Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids grain: the label lists cereals

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 6.60% · Fat 2.40%

Typical analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fed
Protein6.60%
Fat2.40%
Fibre2.90%
Ash1.50%
Moisture75.60%
Carbohydrates11.10%
Omega-3 fatty acids0.06%
Omega-6 fatty acids0.58%
Calcium0.20%
Phosphorus0.14%
Sodium0.08%

Energy: 82.1 kcal/100g

Additives & feeding info

Feeding and storage

Feeding guide

Adjust feeding amounts as necessary to maintain optimal weight. Weight Management: 2.5 kg = 1/4 can; 5 kg = 1/2 can; 10 kg = 3/4-1 can; 20 kg = 1-2 cans; 30 kg = 2 cans; 40 kg = 2-3 cans; 50 kg = 3 cans; 60+ kg = 3 cans + 40 g/kg. Mixed feeding guide provided combining 370 g cans with dry grams.

Additives declared on the label

Nutritional additives

Vitamin A 20,134 IU/kg; Vitamin D3 286 IU/kg; 3b103 (Iron) 8.1 mg/kg; 3b202 (Iodine) 0.3 mg/kg; 3b405 (Copper) 1.3 mg/kg; 3b502 (Manganese) 1.8 mg/kg; 3b603 (Zinc) 20.8 mg/kg

Technological additives

natural antioxidant

Ingredients (7)100% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

  • carb 31.2%
  • meat 18.2%
  • other 15.6%
  • additive 13.0%
  • supplement 11.7%
  • oil 10.4%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
1Meat and animal derivativesMeat and Animal Derivativesmeat · poor-18.2
2cerealsCerealscarb · poor-16.9
3derivatives of vegetable originVegetable By-Productsother · poor-15.6
4vegetable protein extractsVegetable protein extractscarb · poor-14.3
5various sugarsSugarsadditive · poor-13.0
6mineralsVitamins and mineralssupplement · medium-11.7
7oils and fats.Oils and Fatsoil · poor-10.4
  1. 1. Meat and animal derivatives18.2% estimated
  2. 2. cereals16.9% estimated
    Cereals · carb · poor
  3. 3. derivatives of vegetable origin15.6% estimated
    Vegetable By-Products · other · poor
  4. 4. vegetable protein extracts14.3% estimated
  5. 5. various sugars13.0% estimated
    Sugars · additive · poor
  6. 6. minerals11.7% estimated
    Vitamins and minerals · supplement · medium
  7. 7. oils and fats.10.4% estimated
    Oils and Fats · oil · poor

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-15

Brand and contact: Hill's
Hill's logo
Address
Hill’s Pet Nutrition, Inc. Goldsworth Place 1 Forge End Woking GU21 6DB
Contact page
www.hillspet.co.uk

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-15
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)
Product page
www.hillspet.co.uk

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Why this score?

The recipe scored 23 out of 100. Undeclared ingredient shares, where ingredients appear without printed percentages, pulled the score down by -10.6. The overall quality of the ingredient list cost a further -7.2 points, with lower-quality ingredients adding another -5.7 and the carbohydrate content contributing -4.3.

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality-0.89.191-7.16
Carb share of dry matter37.6%-0.115-4.32
Oil share of dry matter14.1%-0.092-1.30
Additive share of dry matter16.0%0.163+2.61
Supplement share of dry matter14.7%-0.012-0.18
Other share of dry matter10.7%-0.375-4.00
Recipe graded poor88.3%-0.065-5.74
Poor-quality meat in recipe18.2%-0.179-3.25
Number of poor ingredients6-0.876-5.26
Largest single poor ingredient18.2%0.060+1.09
Undeclared quantities100.0%-0.106-10.56
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
Additive penalty-18.420.222-4.09
Processing multiplier1.0033.786+33.79
Processing: Wet Pateyes-0.672-0.67
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality-0.89.191-7.16
Meat share of dry matter0.0%0.096+0.00
Carb share of dry matter37.6%-0.115-4.32
Oil share of dry matter14.1%-0.092-1.30
Vegetable share of dry matter0.0%-0.005+0.00
Additive share of dry matter16.0%0.163+2.61
Supplement share of dry matter14.7%-0.012-0.18
Other share of dry matter10.7%-0.375-4.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.027+0.00
Recipe graded poor88.3%-0.065-5.74
Poor-quality meat in recipe18.2%-0.179-3.25
Number of poor ingredients6-0.876-5.26
Largest single poor ingredient18.2%0.060+1.09
Undeclared quantities100.0%-0.106-10.56
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)no0.707+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty-18.420.222-4.09
Processing multiplier1.0033.786+33.79
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateyes-0.672-0.67
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
-0.08
Additives declared on label
+2 transparency bonus
Subtotal
22.9
Final score
23/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v323/100current
v217/100
v139/100
v1.940/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein6.627 (band 18 to 40%)94.7
Fat2.49.8 (band 5.5 to 20%)87.9
Fibre2.911.9 (band 0.5 to 5%)51.4
Calcium0.20.8 (band 0.5 to 2.5%)79.6
Phosphorus0.140.6 (band 0.4 to 1.6%)78.7
Sodium0.080.3 (band 0.1+%)100
Calcium:phosphorus ratio1.41.4 (band 1 to 2%)95.7
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3)--100
Energy (kcal/100g)82.1336.5100

Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.

Scored over 9 declared nutrients (combined weight 105); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.

Declared fortification: 7 nutritional additives on the label
  • Vitamin A 20,134 IU/kg
  • Vitamin D3 286 IU/kg
  • 3b103 (Iron) 8.1 mg/kg
  • 3b202 (Iodine) 0.3 mg/kg
  • 3b405 (Copper) 1.3 mg/kg
  • 3b502 (Manganese) 1.8 mg/kg
  • 3b603 (Zinc) 20.8 mg/kg

High confidence: full analysis plus minerals or omegas and declared energy.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✗ Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file0/20
✓ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory)15/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)10/10
✓ Energy value declared (voluntary)5/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✓ Feeding guidance given (mandatory)10/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)10/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.

Consistent with the label

  • "complete pet food for adult dogs aged 1-6 years old that tend to gain weight easily" — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.

4 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.

Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
Low calories & L-Carnitine help promote ideal body weight (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Satiety control. Keeps your dog satisfied between meals (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Omega-6s & Vitamin E for beautiful skin & coat (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
complete pet food for adult dogs aged 1-6 years old that tend to gain weight easily (on page)ContentconsistentManufacturer assertion
VETERINARIAN RECOMMENDED (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Alternatives to Adult Light Dog Food

Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.

See all alternatives

See all products from Hill's

Community0 comments

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.