Pro Plan Obesity Management
Wet Pate complete
Is Pro Plan Obesity Management a good dog food?
We score it 32/100 (Poor). The main reasons are set out in "Why you might not" below, and every step of the calculation is shown under "How we calculated this score".
Why this score?
This recipe achieves a rating of 32 out of 100 based on our analysis. Several elements influenced this result. The presence of ingredients without printed percentages contributed -13.1 points, while the remaining ingredients added -6.4 points. Furthermore, the overall quality of the ingredient list resulted in -6.3 points, and the additive load contributed -4.9 points to the overall calculation.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
- Recipe32
- Nutritionalmedium82
- Transparency60
- Safety100
- Evidencelimited33
The Recipe score measures how attractive and transparent the declared ingredient list is. It is not, by itself, proof that the food is nutritionally appropriate for long-term feeding. The Nutritional and Evidence scores measure what we can verify towards that stronger claim.
Complete wet paté food for adult dogs, with meat and animal derivatives, vegetable by and cereals as the main ingredients.
Why you might choose it
- High in protein: 41% protein on a dry-matter basis.
- Declares energy content, which most labels omit.
- Nutritionally complete: formulated to be fed as the whole diet.
Why you might not
- 4 poor-graded ingredients make up about 83% of the recipe.
- 100% of the recipe mass has no printed percentage, so the exact split cannot be verified.
- Its additive load costs about 5 points in the rating.
Estimated composition
Typical analysis (as fed)
- Protein
- 8.70%
- Fat
- 2.50%
- Fibre
- 4.40%
- Ash
- 2.20%
- Moisture
- 78.50%
Energy: 57 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Nutritional additives
Vit A: 830 IU/kg; Vit D3: 115 IU/kg; E1: 24.13 mg/kg; b202: 0.46 mg/kg; E4: 2.9 mg/kg; E5: 4.23 mg/kg; b605: 58.8 mg/kg
Technological additives
E499: 2500 mg/kg
Feeding guide
Weight loss guide and weight maintenance guide provided based on adult body weight in kg; daily feeding quantity (g/day) and cans/day listed. Should be fed until target weight reached; can be fed long term for dogs prone to weight gain. Recommended period for hyperlipidaemia: initially up to 2 months. It is recommended that a veterinarian's opinion be sought before use. Clean, fresh drinking water should always be available.
Reviews
Trustpilot: 1.8/5 · 628 reviews
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists cereals
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (5)
| # | As declared | Matched | Category | Tier | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Meat and animal derivatives | Meat and Animal Derivatives | meat | poor | - | 25.0 |
| 2 | Derivatives of vegetable origin | Vegetable By-Products | other | poor | - | 22.5 |
| 3 | Cereals | Cereals | carb | poor | - | 20.0 |
| 4 | Minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement | medium | - | 17.5 |
| 5 | Various sugars | Sugars | additive | poor | - | 15.0 |
Brand
- Phone
- 0800 212 161
- Contact page
- www.purina.co.uk
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-12
- Scored with
- Model v2 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.purina.co.uk
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Scored with model v2 on 2026-09-22. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Average ingredient quality | -0.6 | 9.915 | -6.26 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 10.7% | 0.116 | +1.24 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 26.9% | -0.113 | -3.03 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 20.6% | 0.177 | +3.65 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 24.6% | -0.009 | -0.22 |
| Other share of dry matter | 17.2% | -0.371 | -6.38 |
| Recipe graded poor | 82.5% | -0.045 | -3.69 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 25.0% | -0.182 | -4.55 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 4 | -0.868 | -3.47 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 25.0% | 0.056 | +1.41 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.131 | -13.09 |
| Complete diet | yes | 1.703 | +1.70 |
| Additive penalty | -20.60 | 0.236 | -4.85 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | 2.935 | +2.94 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Average ingredient quality | -0.6 | 9.915 | -6.26 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 10.7% | 0.116 | +1.24 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 26.9% | -0.113 | -3.03 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.088 | +0.00 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.002 | +0.00 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 20.6% | 0.177 | +3.65 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 24.6% | -0.009 | -0.22 |
| Other share of dry matter | 17.2% | -0.371 | -6.38 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.022 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 82.5% | -0.045 | -3.69 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 25.0% | -0.182 | -4.55 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 4 | -0.868 | -3.47 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 25.0% | 0.056 | +1.41 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.131 | -13.09 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 3.194 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 1.703 | +1.70 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 11.440 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | -0.506 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -1.988 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.250 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | -0.073 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | -0.339 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 16.475 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -20.60 | 0.236 | -4.85 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Processing: Raw | no | 13.322 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | 7.712 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | 6.583 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 4.857 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | 0.072 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 11.127 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 9.320 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | 4.569 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -2.321 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.996 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.833 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.711 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | 2.935 | +2.94 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | 2.292 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.16
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 31.9
- Final score
- 32/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 8.7 | 40.5 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 2.5 | 11.6 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 95.4 |
| Fibre | 4.4 | 20.5 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 0 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 57 | 265.1 | 100 |
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The marketing claims made on the pack and product page, and how much evidence sits behind them. We record the claims as stated; we do not assess whether they are true.
| Claim | Type | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|
| High protein to help promote loss of fat while maintaining lean muscle mass (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Low calorie to help reduce quantity of calories consumed (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Helps promote effective and steady weight loss (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Supported by a clinical trial on obese dogs. Clinical trial on 42 dogs, using a high protein formula, Nestle PURINA, 2000 (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Helps reduce caloric intake while maintaining satiety (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Helps reduce post-prandial fluctuation in blood glucose (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Helps maintain optimal body weight after weight loss (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Complete dietetic pet food for adult dogs, for the reduction of excessive body weight, with reduced metabolisable energy (on page) | Content | Manufacturer assertion |
Limited: at least one claim rests on manufacturer assertion alone.
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Other products from Pro Plan
Alternatives to Obesity Management
Foods in our database that are similar on ingredients, protein, format or price. Scores and figures are from the same deterministic model used everywhere on the site.
Community
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.