Hill's Adult Small & Mini Dog Food with Chicken

Wet Pate · complete

Adult Small & Mini Dog Food with Chicken
Poor
our rating

Our verdict

Is Hill's Adult Small & Mini Dog Food with Chicken a good dog food?

We score it 29/100 (Poor). The main reasons are set out in "Why you might not" below, and every step of the calculation is shown under "How we calculated this score".

Complete wet paté food for adult dogs, with meat and animal derivatives, chicken and cereals as the main ingredients.

How we score

92% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

Why you might choose it

  • Declares energy content, which most labels omit.
  • Nutritionally complete: formulated to be fed as the whole diet.

Why you might not

  • 4 poor-graded ingredients make up about 74% of the recipe.
  • 92% of the recipe mass has no printed percentage, so the exact split cannot be verified.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
  • Labelling or feeding guide is aimed at small dogs
  • Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken
  • Your dog avoids grain: the label lists cereals

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 5.50% · Fat 3.20%

Typical analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fed
Protein5.50%
Fat3.20%
Fibre0.26%
Ash1.20%
Moisture80%
Carbohydrates9.90%
Omega-3 fatty acids0.06%
Omega-6 fatty acids0.51%
Calcium0.20%
Phosphorus0.13%
Sodium0.06%

Energy: 80.6 kcal/100g

Additives & feeding info

Feeding and storage

Storage

To prevent suffocation, keep the packaging out of the reach of pets and children.

Feeding guide

Adjust feeding amounts as necessary to maintain optimal weight. For adult maintenance (cans only): 3 kg = 1/2 can, 4 kg = 1/2 can, 5 kg = 2/3 can, 7 kg = 1 can, 10 kg = 1 1/2 cans. Mixed feeding (cans + grams dry): 1 kg = 1/2 can + 10 g, 2 kg = 1/2 can + 30 g, 5 kg = 1 can + 60 g, 7 kg = 1 can + 85 g, 10 kg = 1 can + 125 g. Transition over 7 days. Keep fresh water available at all times.

Additives declared on the label

Nutritional additives

3b103 (Iron) 10.0mg; 3b202 (Iodine) 0.3mg; 3b405 (Copper) 1.6mg; 3b502 (Manganese) 2.2mg; 3b603 (Zinc) 25.6mg; Vitamin A 30,073 IU/kg; Vitamin D3 265 IU/kg; Vitamin C 40 ppm; Vitamin E 149 IU/kg

Ingredients (6)92% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

  • meat 31.0%
  • carb 20.7%
  • supplement 18.4%
  • oil 16.1%
  • other 13.8%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
1Meat and animal derivativesMeat and Animal Derivativesmeat · poor-23.0
2chicken 8%Chickenmeat · medium88.0
3cerealsCerealscarb · poor-20.7
4mineralsVitamins and mineralssupplement · medium-18.4
5oils and fatsOils and Fatsoil · poor-16.1
6derivatives of vegetable origin.Vegetable By-Productsother · poor-13.8
  1. 1. Meat and animal derivatives23.0% estimated
  2. 2. chicken 8%8% declared8.0% estimated
    Chicken · meat · medium
  3. 3. cereals20.7% estimated
    Cereals · carb · poor
  4. 4. minerals18.4% estimated
    Vitamins and minerals · supplement · medium
  5. 5. oils and fats16.1% estimated
    Oils and Fats · oil · poor
  6. 6. derivatives of vegetable origin.13.8% estimated
    Vegetable By-Products · other · poor

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-15

Brand and contact: Hill's
Hill's logo
Address
Hill’s Pet Nutrition, Inc. Goldsworth Place 1 Forge End Woking GU21 6DB
Contact page
www.hillspet.co.uk

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-15
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)
Product page
www.hillspet.co.uk

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Why this score?

The product reached a score of 29 out of 100. Ingredients without printed percentages cost -9.7 points. The overall quality of the ingredient list led to a deduction of -5.2 points. Lower-quality ingredients reduced the score by -4.8, and lower-quality meat ingredients took off another -4.1 points.

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality-0.69.191-5.23
Meat share of dry matter3.4%0.096+0.32
Carb share of dry matter27.3%-0.115-3.14
Oil share of dry matter23.9%-0.092-2.20
Supplement share of dry matter25.4%-0.012-0.31
Other share of dry matter10.4%-0.375-3.88
Recipe graded poor73.6%-0.065-4.78
Poor-quality meat in recipe23.0%-0.179-4.11
Number of poor ingredients4-0.876-3.50
Largest single poor ingredient23.0%0.060+1.38
Undeclared quantities92.0%-0.106-9.71
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
Additive penalty-1.840.222-0.41
Processing multiplier1.0033.786+33.79
Processing: Wet Pateyes-0.672-0.67
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality-0.69.191-5.23
Meat share of dry matter3.4%0.096+0.32
Carb share of dry matter27.3%-0.115-3.14
Oil share of dry matter23.9%-0.092-2.20
Vegetable share of dry matter0.0%-0.005+0.00
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.163+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter25.4%-0.012-0.31
Other share of dry matter10.4%-0.375-3.88
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.027+0.00
Recipe graded poor73.6%-0.065-4.78
Poor-quality meat in recipe23.0%-0.179-4.11
Number of poor ingredients4-0.876-3.50
Largest single poor ingredient23.0%0.060+1.38
Undeclared quantities92.0%-0.106-9.71
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)no0.707+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty-1.840.222-0.41
Processing multiplier1.0033.786+33.79
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateyes-0.672-0.67
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
-0.08
Additives declared on label
+1 transparency bonus
Subtotal
28.5
Final score
29/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v329/100current
v235/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein5.527.5 (band 18.135 to 40%)95.7
Fat3.216 (band 5.541250000000001 to 20%)100
Fibre0.261.3 (band 0.5 to 5%)80.7
Calcium0.21 (band 0.50375 to 2.5%)84.9
Phosphorus0.130.7 (band 0.403 to 1.6%)82.4
Sodium0.060.3 (band 0.10075+%)100
Calcium:phosphorus ratio1.51.5 (band 1 to 2%)100
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3)--100
Energy (kcal/100g)80.6403100

Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.

Scored over 9 declared nutrients (combined weight 105); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.

Declared fortification: 9 nutritional additives on the label
  • 3b103 (Iron) 10.0mg
  • 3b202 (Iodine) 0.3mg
  • 3b405 (Copper) 1.6mg
  • 3b502 (Manganese) 2.2mg
  • 3b603 (Zinc) 25.6mg
  • Vitamin A 30,073 IU/kg
  • Vitamin D3 265 IU/kg
  • Vitamin C 40 ppm
  • Vitamin E 149 IU/kg

High confidence: full analysis plus minerals or omegas and declared energy.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (8% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)1.6/20
✓ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory)15/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)5/10
✓ Energy value declared (voluntary)5/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✓ Feeding guidance given (mandatory)10/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)10/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.

Consistent with the label

  • "complete premium pet food for small breed adult dogs aged 1–6 years" — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.

8 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.

Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
Powerful blend of antioxidants to support their immune system (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Easy-to-digest ingredients for healthy digestion (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Soft mousse texture with the right combination of protein, fats, and carbs to give them the energy they need (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
VETERINARIAN RECOMMENDED (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
100% SATISFACTION GUARANTEE for quality, consistency & taste, or your money back (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
complete premium pet food for small breed adult dogs aged 1–6 years (on page)ContentconsistentManufacturer assertion
deliciously smooth mousse (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
with Chicken (on pack)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Proud to have helped 15 MILLION SHELTER PETS find a forever home (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Alternatives to Adult Small & Mini Dog Food with Chicken

Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.

See all alternatives

See all products from Hill's

Community0 comments

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.