Morrisons Dry Worker Breed Dog Food With Beef & Veg

Wet Pate · completeClear label

Dry Worker Breed Dog Food With Beef & Veg
Poor
our rating

Our verdict

Is Morrisons Dry Worker Breed Dog Food With Beef & Veg a good dog food?

We score it 43/100 (Poor). The main reasons are set out in "Why you might not" below, and every step of the calculation is shown under "How we calculated this score".

Complete wet paté food for adult dogs, with cereals, meat and animal derivatives and beef as the main ingredients.

How we score

Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.

78% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

Why you might choose it

  • Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
  • Nutritionally complete: formulated to be fed as the whole diet.

Why you might not

  • 3 poor-graded ingredients make up about 42% of the recipe.
  • Low in protein: 20% protein on a dry-matter basis.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
  • Doesn't list chicken, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids beef: the label lists beef
  • Your dog avoids grain: the label lists cereals
  • You need more protein than this: 20.0% on a dry-matter basis is in the low band

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 20% · Fat 11%

Typical analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fed
Protein20%
Fat11%
Fibre3.50%
Ash7.50%
Omega-3 fatty acids0.30%
Omega-6 fatty acids2.50%
Calcium2%

Additives & feeding info

Feeding and storage

Storage

Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight. Fold bag once opened. For batch code and best before end see bottom of pack

Feeding guide

Up to 5kg: 30-115g/day; 5-10kg: 115-195g/day; 10-30kg: 195-445g/day; 30-50kg: 445-650g/day. Adjust to maintain healthy body condition based on activity.

Additives declared on the label

Nutritional additives

Vitamin A 17,000 IU/kg; Vitamin D3 1,500 IU/kg; Vitamin E 70 mg/kg; Iodine (calcium iodate anhydrous) 2.5 mg/kg; Selenium (sodium selenite) 0.1 mg/kg; Copper (copper (II) sulphate pentahydrate) 8 mg/kg; Iron (iron (II) sulphate monohydrate) 60 mg/kg; Manganese (manganese (II) oxide) 50 mg/kg; Zinc (zinc oxide) 100 mg/kg

Technological additives

Antioxidants

Ingredients (8)78% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

  • veg 26.3%
  • meat 22.0%
  • carb 16.3%
  • oil 15.0%
  • other 10.9%
  • supplement 9.5%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
1CerealsCerealscarb · poor-19.4
2Meat and Animal DerivativesMeat and Animal Derivativesmeat · poor-17.8
34% BeefBeefmeat · medium44.0
4Oils and FatsOils and Fatsoil · poor-16.1
5VegetablesVegetablesveg · medium-14.5
64% PeasPeasveg · good44.0
7Derivatives of Vegetable OriginVegetable By-Productsother · poor-12.9
8MineralsVitamins and mineralssupplement · medium-11.3
  1. 1. Cereals19.4% estimated
    Cereals · carb · poor
  2. 2. Meat and Animal Derivatives17.8% estimated
  3. 3. 4% Beef4% declared4.0% estimated
    Beef · meat · medium
  4. 4. Oils and Fats16.1% estimated
    Oils and Fats · oil · poor
  5. 5. Vegetables14.5% estimated
    Vegetables · veg · medium
  6. 6. 4% Peas4% declared4.0% estimated
    Peas · veg · good
  7. 7. Derivatives of Vegetable Origin12.9% estimated
    Vegetable By-Products · other · poor
  8. 8. Minerals11.3% estimated
    Vitamins and minerals · supplement · medium

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-12

Brand and contact: Morrisons

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-12
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.

5 reviews on this product · 3.4/5

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Why this score?

This recipe achieves an overall score of 43 out of 100 based on several key factors. Ingredients without printed percentages reduced the score by -8.2 points, and the overall quality of the ingredient list contributed -4.1 points. Additionally, the remaining ingredients accounted for a reduction of -3.8 points, while the carbohydrate content adjusted the score by -3.1 points.

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality-0.49.191-4.07
Meat share of dry matter11.4%0.096+1.10
Carb share of dry matter26.7%-0.115-3.07
Oil share of dry matter27.5%-0.092-2.53
Vegetable share of dry matter8.0%-0.005-0.04
Supplement share of dry matter16.3%-0.012-0.20
Other share of dry matter10.1%-0.375-3.78
Recipe graded poor42.1%-0.065-2.74
Number of poor ingredients3-0.876-2.63
Largest single poor ingredient16.3%0.060+0.98
Undeclared quantities77.5%-0.106-8.18
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Processing multiplier1.0033.786+33.79
Processing: Wet Pateyes-0.672-0.67
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality-0.49.191-4.07
Meat share of dry matter11.4%0.096+1.10
Carb share of dry matter26.7%-0.115-3.07
Oil share of dry matter27.5%-0.092-2.53
Vegetable share of dry matter8.0%-0.005-0.04
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.163+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter16.3%-0.012-0.20
Other share of dry matter10.1%-0.375-3.78
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.027+0.00
Recipe graded poor42.1%-0.065-2.74
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.179+0.00
Number of poor ingredients3-0.876-2.63
Largest single poor ingredient16.3%0.060+0.98
Undeclared quantities77.5%-0.106-8.18
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)no0.707+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)no-3.158+0.00
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty0.000.222+0.00
Processing multiplier1.0033.786+33.79
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateyes-0.672-0.67
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
-0.08
Additives declared on label
+2 transparency bonus
Subtotal
43.1
Final score
43/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v343/100current
v247/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein2090.9 (band 18 to 40%)100
Fat1150 (band 5.5 to 20%)100
Fibre3.515.9 (band 0.5 to 5%)1.1
Calcium29.1 (band 0.5 to 2.5%)0
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3)--100

Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.

Scored over 5 declared nutrients (combined weight 70); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 78% from the food type.

Declared fortification: 9 nutritional additives on the label
  • Vitamin A 17,000 IU/kg
  • Vitamin D3 1,500 IU/kg
  • Vitamin E 70 mg/kg
  • Iodine (calcium iodate anhydrous) 2.5 mg/kg
  • Selenium (sodium selenite) 0.1 mg/kg
  • Copper (copper (II) sulphate pentahydrate) 8 mg/kg
  • Iron (iron (II) sulphate monohydrate) 60 mg/kg
  • Manganese (manganese (II) oxide) 50 mg/kg
  • Zinc (zinc oxide) 100 mg/kg

Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (22.5% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)4.5/20
✗ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file0/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)10/10
✗ Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file0/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✓ Feeding guidance given (mandatory)10/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✓ Batch and date labelling (mandatory)5/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

100/100 · moderate — 2 checkable claims: 2 consistent, 0 contradicted.

Consistent with the label

  • "A complete feed for adult working dogs" — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.
  • "100% Complete and balanced" — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.

6 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.

Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
A complete feed for adult working dogs (on pack)ContentconsistentManufacturer assertion
Crafted with dog experts (on pack)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
No Added Artificial Colours or Flavours (on pack)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Omega 3 & 6 Promotes Healthy Skin & Coat (on pack)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Calcium Supports Strong Teeth & Bones (on pack)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
With antioxidants to support a healthy immune system (on pack)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
With fibre to support healthy digestion (on pack)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
100% Complete and balanced (on pack)ContentconsistentManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Alternatives to Dry Worker Breed Dog Food With Beef & Veg

Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.

See all alternatives

See all products from Morrisons

Community0 comments

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.