Our verdict
Is Forza10 Puppy Condro a good dog food?
We score it 55/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete extruded dry food for puppies, with rice, meat meal and maize gluten as the main ingredients.
68% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for puppies
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists green-lipped mussel
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - white
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 32.50% · Fat 16%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 32.50% |
| Fat | 16% |
| Fibre | 2.50% |
| Ash | 7.60% |
| Moisture | 8% |
| Omega-3 fatty acids | 3.30% |
| Calcium | 1.20% |
| Phosphorus | 1.10% |
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Store in a cool, dry place.
Feeding guide
Recommended period of use: initially up to 3 months for support of joint metabolism, and from 3 to 8 weeks for reduction of intolerance to ingredients and nutrients. If intolerance symptoms disappear, the food can be initially used up to 1 year. It is recommended that a veterinarian's opinion be sought before use or before extending the period of use. Water should be available at all times. Feed only FORZA10 for best results; gradual introduction is not necessary.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
vitamin A 32000 IU; vitamin E/all-rac-alpha-tocopheryl acetate 530 mg; vitamin B1 6.64 mg; vitamin B2 17 mg; vitamin B6 13 mg; vitamin B12 0.11 mg; vitamin C 85 mg; vitamin PP 44 mg; calcium D-pantothenate 14.91 mg; folic acid 3.30 mg; choline chloride 700 mg; zinc sulphate monohydrate 135 mg (Zn 50 mg); copper(II) chelate of amino acids hydrate 39 mg (Cu 10 mg); DL-methionine 500 mg
Technological additives
clinoptilolite of sedimentary origin 580 mg; antioxidants; preservatives; tocopherol extract from vegetable oils 16.7 mg
Ingredients (20)68% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 34.1%
- supplement 26.0%
- carb 19.9%
- oil 16.4%
- fibre 3.7%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Milled rice | Rice - white | carb · medium | - | 6.3 |
| 2 | dehydrated fish 24.5% | Meat Meal | meat · medium | 24.5 | 24.5 |
| 3 | corn protein | Maize gluten | carb · poor | - | 6.1 |
| 4 | oils and fats | Oils and Fats | oil · poor | - | 5.9 |
| 5 | fish oil 7% | Fish Oil | oil · good | 7 | 7.0 |
| 6 | potato protein | Potato protein | carb · medium | - | 5.7 |
| 7 | minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 5.4 |
| 8 | hydrolysed animal protein | Hydrolysed Animal Protein | meat · medium | - | 5.2 |
| 9 | chondroitin sulphate 0.0811% | Chondroitin | supplement · good | 0.0811 | 0.08 |
| 10 | plant glucosamine 0.0810% | Glucosamine | supplement · good | 0.081 | 0.08 |
| 11 | Perna canaliculus 0.0635% | Green-Lipped Mussel | supplement · good | 0.0635 | 0.06 |
| 12 | chitosan | Chitosan | supplement · medium | - | 5.0 |
| 13 | anchovy oil 0.03% | Anchovy Oil | oil · good | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| 14 | rice middlings | Rice - white | carb · medium | - | 4.8 |
| 15 | brewers yeast | Brewer's Yeast | supplement · good | - | 4.5 |
| 16 | beet pulp | Beet Pulp | fibre · medium | - | 4.3 |
| 17 | minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 4.1 |
| 18 | mannan oligosaccharides (MOS) | Mannanoligosaccharides | supplement · good | - | 3.9 |
| 19 | fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS) | Fructo-oligosaccharides | supplement · good | - | 3.6 |
| 20 | Yucca schidigera. | Yucca Schidigera | supplement · good | - | 3.4 |
- 1. Milled rice6.3% estimated
- 2. dehydrated fish 24.5%24.5% declared24.5% estimated
- 3. corn protein6.1% estimated
- 4. oils and fats5.9% estimated
- 5. fish oil 7%7% declared7.0% estimated
- 6. potato protein5.7% estimated
- 7. minerals5.4% estimated
- 8. hydrolysed animal protein5.2% estimated
- 9. chondroitin sulphate 0.0811%0.0811% declared0.08% estimated
- 10. plant glucosamine 0.0810%0.081% declared0.08% estimated
- 11. Perna canaliculus 0.0635%0.0635% declared0.06% estimated
- 12. chitosan5.0% estimated
- 13. anchovy oil 0.03%0.03% declared0.03% estimated
- 14. rice middlings4.8% estimated
- 15. brewers yeast4.5% estimated
- 16. beet pulp4.3% estimated
- 17. minerals4.1% estimated
- 18. mannan oligosaccharides (MOS)3.9% estimated
- 19. fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS)3.6% estimated
- 20. Yucca schidigera.3.4% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-15
Brand and contact: Forza10
- Website
- https://forza10.com/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-15
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- forza10.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves an overall rating of 55 out of 100. The meat content contributed +2.5 points, while the overall quality of the ingredient list added +4.3 points to the total. However, the processing format reduced the score by -6.7 and ingredients without printed percentages decreased it by -7.2.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.33 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 26.2% | 0.096 | +2.52 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 16.7% | -0.115 | -1.93 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 18.9% | -0.092 | -1.74 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 27.8% | -0.012 | -0.34 |
| Recipe graded poor | 10.6% | -0.065 | -0.69 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.876 | -1.75 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 5.4% | 0.060 | +0.32 |
| Undeclared quantities | 68.3% | -0.106 | -7.21 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.33 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 26.2% | 0.096 | +2.52 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 16.7% | -0.115 | -1.93 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 18.9% | -0.092 | -1.74 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.005 | +0.00 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 27.8% | -0.012 | -0.34 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 10.6% | -0.065 | -0.69 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.876 | -1.75 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 5.4% | 0.060 | +0.32 |
| Undeclared quantities | 68.3% | -0.106 | -7.21 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 55.1
- Final score
- 55/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for puppies and growth. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Scored against FEDIAF growth minima; puppy scoring is under review.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 32.5 | 35.3 | 100 |
| Fat | 16 | 17.4 | 100 |
| Calcium | 1.2 | 1.3 | 100 |
| Phosphorus | 1.1 | 1.2 | 100 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.1 | 1.1 | 100 |
| Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3) | - | - | 100 |
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-3 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.
Scored over 6 declared nutrients (combined weight 80); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 14 nutritional additives on the label
- vitamin A 32000 IU
- vitamin E/all-rac-alpha-tocopheryl acetate 530 mg
- vitamin B1 6.64 mg
- vitamin B2 17 mg
- vitamin B6 13 mg
- vitamin B12 0.11 mg
- vitamin C 85 mg
- vitamin PP 44 mg
- calcium D-pantothenate 14.91 mg
- folic acid 3.30 mg
- choline chloride 700 mg
- zinc sulphate monohydrate 135 mg (Zn 50 mg)
- copper(II) chelate of amino acids hydrate 39 mg (Cu 10 mg)
- DL-methionine 500 mg
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (31.7% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 6.3/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
50/100 · limited — 2 checkable claims: 1 consistent, 1 contradicted.
Contradicted by the label
- "Monoprotein: formulated with an alternative single source of animal protein: fish protein high in biological value and bioavailability." — the declared label says otherwise on single protein.
Consistent with the label
- "Complete dietetic food for puppies and pregnant or lactating dogs." — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.
3 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Limited: at least one claim contradicts the declared label, or a recent upheld ASA ruling applies.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Omega3 & EPA: Optimum balance between Omega-3 and EPA fatty acids from fish oil to support joint functionality. (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Limited ingredients formula: made with only a few select and high quality ingredients to minimise the risk of food intolerance. (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Complete dietetic food for puppies and pregnant or lactating dogs. (on page) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Monoprotein: formulated with an alternative single source of animal protein: fish protein high in biological value and bioavailability. (on page) | Content | contradicted | Manufacturer assertion |
| Without added colours: any changes in colour are solely due to the ingredients in the formulation. (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Puppy Condro
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.