Wilsons Chicken Premium Cold Pressed Dog Food

Dry Cold Pressed complete High meat Clear label Full label

Chicken Premium Cold Pressed Dog Food
Good
our rating

Is Wilsons Chicken Premium Cold Pressed Dog Food a good dog food?

We score it 84/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.

How we score

Why this score?

This recipe achieves an overall score of 84 out of one hundred based on several key factors. The meat content contributed +7.4 points to the total, while the overall quality of the ingredient list added +6.5 points. Additionally, the processing format contributed +4.6 points, and printing percentages on the label provided another +3.2 points.

Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.

The Recipe score measures how attractive and transparent the declared ingredient list is. It is not, by itself, proof that the food is nutritionally appropriate for long-term feeding. The Nutritional and Evidence scores measure what we can verify towards that stronger claim.

Complete cold-pressed dry food for dogs of all life stages, with chicken, sweet potatoes and peas as the main ingredients.

Why you might choose it

  • Scores 84, in the top quarter of dry foods we track.
  • Meat makes up an estimated 64% of the dry matter (36% as fed).
  • Prints ingredient percentages on the label.

Why you might not

View the source page

Estimated composition

meat36.0%
carb28.5%
veg27.8%
oil3.0%
fibre2.5%
supplement2.1%
additive0.0%

Typical analysis (as fed)

Protein
26%
Fat
14%
Fibre
2.50%
Ash
6.50%
Calcium
1.10%
Phosphorus
0.70%

Energy: 381 kcal/100g

Additives & feeding info

Nutritional additives

Vitamin A as retinyl acetate 18000 IU/kg; Vitamin D3 as cholecalciferol 1500 IU/kg; Vitamin E as all rac-alpha tocopherol acetate 350 mg/kg; Iron chelate of lysine and glutamic acid 80 mg/kg; Zinc chelate of lysine and glutamic acid 100 mg/kg; Manganese chelate of lysine and glutamic acid 10 mg/kg; Copper chelate of lysine and glutamic acid 8 mg/kg; Iodine - calcium iodate anhydrous 1.5 mg/kg

Technological additives

Natural antioxidants (tocopherol extracts and rosemary extract)

Storage

Store in a cool, dry place. If decanting use a breathable container.

Feeding guide

Use as a guide; consider breed, condition and activity level. Food is nutritionally dense so may require less than current food. Switch gradually: Days 1-3 25% new food, Days 4-6 50%, Days 7-9 75%, Day 9+ 100%. Ensure fresh water is always available.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
  • Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
  • Doesn't list beef, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken
  • Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists poultry hydrolysate
  • You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.

Ingredients (29)

#As declaredMatchedCategoryTierDeclared %Est. %
1Dried ground chicken (30%)Chickenmeatmedium3030.0
2sweet potato (28.5%)Sweet Potatoescarbgood28.528.5
3peas (25.5%)Peasveggood25.525.5
4chicken hydrolysate (6%)Poultry Hydrolysatemeatgood66.0
5chicken oil (3%)Chicken Oil and Fatoilgood33.0
6beet fibre (2%)Beet Fibrefibremedium22.0
7carrot (1%)Carrotsveggood11.0
8kale (0.5%)Kaleveggood0.50.5
9apple (0.5%)Applesveggood0.50.5
10seaweed (0.5%)Seaweedveggood0.50.5
11pea fibre (0.5%)Pea Fibrefibremedium0.50.5
12postbiotic - inactivated yeast saccharomyces cerevisiae (0.4%)Yeastsupplementgood0.40.4
13vitamins and minerals (1.8%)Vitamins and mineralssupplementmedium1.81.8
14chicoryChicoryveggood-0.0
15inulinInulinfibregood-0.0
16DL-methionineMethioninesupplementgood-0.0
17prebiotic - mannan-oligosaccharidesMannanoligosaccharidessupplementgood-0.0
18glucosamineGlucosaminesupplementgood-0.0
19chondroitin sulphateChondroitinsupplementgood-0.0
20yucca schidigeraYucca Schidigerasupplementgood-0.0
21natural antioxidants (tocopherol extracts and rosemary extract)Antioxidantsadditivepoor-0.0
22L-tryptophanL-Tryptophansupplementgood-0.0
23thymeThymeveggood-0.0
24carnitineCarnitinesupplementgood-0.0
25cranberryCranberriesveggood-0.0
26dandelion rootDandelion Rootveggood-0.0
27marigold yellowCalendulaveggood-0.0
28gingerGingerveggood-0.0
29turmeric.Turmericveggood-0.0

Brand

Trust and provenance

Label data last checked
2026-09-15
Scored with
Model v2 (methodology)

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Scored with model v2 on 2026-09-22. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-32.336+32.34
Average ingredient quality0.79.915+6.51
Meat share of dry matter64.0%0.116+7.42
Carb share of dry matter13.8%-0.113-1.55
Oil share of dry matter5.7%-0.088-0.51
Vegetable share of dry matter8.2%-0.002-0.01
Additive share of dry matter0.1%0.177+0.01
Supplement share of dry matter3.8%-0.009-0.03
Number of poor ingredients1-0.868-0.87
Undeclared quantities0.7%-0.131-0.09
Prints ingredient percentagesyes3.194+3.19
Complete dietyes1.703+1.70
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes-0.506-0.51
Meat share × printed percentages64.0-0.073-4.69
Additive penalty-0.050.236-0.01
Processing multiplier1.0032.336+32.34
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedyes4.569+4.57
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-32.336+32.34
Average ingredient quality0.79.915+6.51
Meat share of dry matter64.0%0.116+7.42
Carb share of dry matter13.8%-0.113-1.55
Oil share of dry matter5.7%-0.088-0.51
Vegetable share of dry matter8.2%-0.002-0.01
Additive share of dry matter0.1%0.177+0.01
Supplement share of dry matter3.8%-0.009-0.03
Other share of dry matter0.0%-0.371+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.022+0.00
Recipe graded poor0.0%-0.045-0.00
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.182+0.00
Number of poor ingredients1-0.868-0.87
Largest single poor ingredient0.0%0.056+0.00
Undeclared quantities0.7%-0.131-0.09
Prints ingredient percentagesyes3.194+3.19
Complete dietyes1.703+1.70
Frozen or chilled freshno11.440+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes-0.506-0.51
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)no-1.988+0.00
High carb and low meatno-1.250+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages64.0-0.073-4.69
Meat share × fresh0.0-0.339+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.016.475+0.00
Additive penalty-0.050.236-0.01
Processing multiplier1.0032.336+32.34
Processing: Rawno13.322+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno7.712+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno6.583+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno4.857+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno0.072+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno11.127+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno9.320+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedyes4.569+4.57
Processing: Dry Bakedno-2.321+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedno-6.996+0.00
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.833+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.711+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno2.935+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno2.292+0.00
Processing-type offset
-0.02
Additives declared on label
+2 transparency bonus
Nearly all quantities printed on label
+2 full-disclosure bonus
Subtotal
83.8
Final score
84/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v284/100current
v178/100
v1.979/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein2628.4 (band 18 to 40%)98.2
Fat1415.3 (band 5.5 to 20%)100
Fibre2.52.7 (band 0.5 to 5%)99.7
Calcium1.11.2 (band 0.5 to 2.5%)91
Phosphorus0.70.8 (band 0.4 to 1.6%)88.2
Calcium:phosphorus ratio1.61.6 (band 1 to 2%)100
Energy (kcal/100g)381415.5100

Scored over 7 declared nutrients (combined weight 90); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 8.3% from the food type.

Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
Printed percentages on the label (99.3% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)19.9/20
Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file0/15
Additives declared (mandatory)10/10
Energy value declared (voluntary)5/5
Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
Feeding guidance given (mandatory)10/10
Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

IncidentDeduction
Product recall: Wilsons recalls cold pressed dog food because of the presence of salmonella (2022-03-15, Resolved)
Reason: pathogen
30 points, decayed over 4.52 years: 30 x 0.5^(4.52/2) = 6.3
-6.25

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The marketing claims made on the pack and product page, and how much evidence sits behind them. We record the claims as stated; we do not assess whether they are true.

ClaimTypeSubstantiation
Suitable for 2 Months+ (on pack)FunctionalManufacturer assertion
Easier to digest than kibble (on page)FunctionalManufacturer assertion
Joint care (on page)FunctionalManufacturer assertion
Immune Support (on page)FunctionalManufacturer assertion
Improved Skin & Coat (on page)FunctionalManufacturer assertion
Firmer Poos (on page)FunctionalManufacturer assertion
Improved Digestion (on page)FunctionalManufacturer assertion
Reduced Gas and Bloating (on page)FunctionalManufacturer assertion
Nutritionally Complete (on pack)ContentManufacturer assertion
Minimally Processed (on page)ContentManufacturer assertion
Made in Britain (on pack)ContentManufacturer assertion
Grain Free (on pack)Free-fromManufacturer assertion
More nutritious than kibble (on page)High/low levelManufacturer assertion
Allergy Support (on page)FunctionalManufacturer assertion
Vision Support (on page)FunctionalManufacturer assertion
Heart Care (on page)FunctionalManufacturer assertion

Limited: at least one claim rests on manufacturer assertion alone.

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Other products from Wilsons

Alternatives to Chicken Premium Cold Pressed Dog Food

Foods in our database that are similar on ingredients, protein, format or price. Scores and figures are from the same deterministic model used everywhere on the site.

See all alternatives

Community

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.