Pedigree COMPLETE™ Junior/Puppy Dry Chicken and Rice
Dry Extruded · completeClear label
Our verdict
Is Pedigree COMPLETE™ Junior/Puppy Dry Chicken and Rice a good dog food?
We score it 34/100 (Poor). The main reasons are set out in "Why you might not" below, and every step of the calculation is shown under "How we calculated this score".
Complete extruded dry food for puppies, with cereals, rice and meat and animal derivatives as the main ingredients.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
66% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for puppies
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists cereals
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 27.30% · Fat 13.90%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 27.30% |
| Fat | 13.90% |
| Fibre | 2.60% |
| Ash | 7.20% |
| Calcium | 1.30% |
| Phosphorus | 1.10% |
Energy: 377 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
Daily feeding recommendation by age (2–12 months) and expected adult weight: e.g. 2 months 85–300g in 4 meals, 4 months 120–435g in 3 meals, 6–9 months 125–460g in 2 meals, 12 months 410–450g in 2 meals. 115g dry food can be swapped for one 400g can of Pedigree® wet food. Switch to adult food at 15 months; soften dry food with water for young puppies.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin D₃: 1500 IU; Vitamin E: 100 IU; Copper (Copper(II) sulphate pentahydrate): 9.0 mg; Iodine (Potassium iodide): 2.3 mg; Manganese (Manganous sulphate, monohydrate): 31.5 mg; Selenium (Sodium selenite): 0.20 mg; Zinc (Zinc sulphate, monohydrate): 89.0 mg
Technological additives
Antioxidants; Colourants
Ingredients (9)66% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- carb 31.9%
- meat 30.0%
- oil 15.2%
- other 13.1%
- supplement 9.8%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cereals | Cereals | carb · poor | - | 19.3 |
| 2 | 4% Rice | Rice - white | carb · medium | 4 | 4.0 |
| 3 | Meat and Animal Derivatives | Meat and Animal Derivatives | meat · poor | - | 17.7 |
| 4 | 4% Chicken | Chicken | meat · medium | 4 | 4.0 |
| 5 | Oils and Fats | Oils and Fats | oil · poor | - | 16.1 |
| 6 | 0.4% Sunflower Oil | Sunflower oil | oil · good | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| 7 | Derivatives of Vegetable Origin | Vegetable By-Products | other · poor | - | 14.5 |
| 8 | Vegetable Protein Extracts | Vegetable protein extracts | carb · poor | - | 12.9 |
| 9 | Minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 11.2 |
- 1. Cereals19.3% estimated
- 2. 4% Rice4% declared4.0% estimated
- 3. Meat and Animal Derivatives17.7% estimated
- 4. 4% Chicken4% declared4.0% estimated
- 5. Oils and Fats16.1% estimated
- 6. 0.4% Sunflower Oil0.4% declared0.4% estimated
- 7. Derivatives of Vegetable Origin14.5% estimated
- 8. Vegetable Protein Extracts12.9% estimated
- 9. Minerals11.2% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-08-29
Brand and contact: Pedigree
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-08-29
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.uk.pedigree.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: - · 3 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This food achieves an overall score of 34 out of 100 based on several key factors. Ingredients without printed percentages contributed -6.9, while the processing format adjusted the score by -6.7. Furthermore, the overall quality of the ingredient list added -4.8, and the carbohydrate content contributed -4.8 to the final calculation.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | -0.5 | 9.191 | -4.77 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 12.5% | 0.096 | +1.20 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 41.8% | -0.115 | -4.81 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 22.4% | -0.092 | -2.06 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 13.5% | -0.012 | -0.16 |
| Other share of dry matter | 9.8% | -0.375 | -3.66 |
| Recipe graded poor | 55.8% | -0.065 | -3.62 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 4 | -0.876 | -3.50 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 16.4% | 0.060 | +0.98 |
| Undeclared quantities | 65.6% | -0.106 | -6.93 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Additive penalty | -0.69 | 0.222 | -0.15 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | -0.5 | 9.191 | -4.77 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 12.5% | 0.096 | +1.20 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 41.8% | -0.115 | -4.81 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 22.4% | -0.092 | -2.06 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.005 | +0.00 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 13.5% | -0.012 | -0.16 |
| Other share of dry matter | 9.8% | -0.375 | -3.66 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 55.8% | -0.065 | -3.62 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 4 | -0.876 | -3.50 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 16.4% | 0.060 | +0.98 |
| Undeclared quantities | 65.6% | -0.106 | -6.93 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -0.69 | 0.222 | -0.15 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 34.1
- Final score
- 34/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for puppies and growth. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Scored against FEDIAF growth minima; puppy scoring is under review.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 27.3 | 30.2 | 100 |
| Fat | 13.9 | 15.4 | 100 |
| Calcium | 1.3 | 1.4 | 100 |
| Phosphorus | 1.1 | 1.2 | 100 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.2 | 1.2 | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 377 | 416.6 | 100 |
Scored over 6 declared nutrients (combined weight 80); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.
Declared fortification: 7 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin D₃: 1500 IU
- Vitamin E: 100 IU
- Copper (Copper(II) sulphate pentahydrate): 9.0 mg
- Iodine (Potassium iodide): 2.3 mg
- Manganese (Manganous sulphate, monohydrate): 31.5 mg
- Selenium (Sodium selenite): 0.20 mg
- Zinc (Zinc sulphate, monohydrate): 89.0 mg
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (34.4% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 6.9/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "100% complete and balanced" — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.
7 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| contains the right amount of calcium to support healthy teeth development (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| contain vitamin E to support natural defences (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| contain natural fibres and high quality protein, which supports a healthy digestion (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| formulated with zinc and sunflower oil, a natural source of omega 6 fatty acids, that will help nourish their skin and coat (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| made with selected natural ingredients, plus vitamins and minerals (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 100% complete and balanced (on page) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| made with NO palm oil (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| contains no added artificial flavours (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to COMPLETE™ Junior/Puppy Dry Chicken and Rice
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.