Wonderdog High Gold

Dry Extruded · complete

High Gold
Poor
our rating

Our verdict

Is Wonderdog High Gold a good dog food?

We score it 17/100 (Poor). The main reasons are set out in "Why you might not" below, and every step of the calculation is shown under "How we calculated this score".

Complete extruded dry food for adult dogs, with cereals, meat and animal derivatives and vegetable by as the main ingredients.

How we score

Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.

100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

Why you might choose it

  • Low in fat for its format: 7% fat on a dry-matter basis.
  • Nutritionally complete: formulated to be fed as the whole diet.

Why you might not

  • 6 poor-graded ingredients make up about 81% of the recipe.
  • Meat makes up an estimated 6% of the dry matter (15% as fed); carbohydrates dominate.
  • 100% of the recipe mass has no printed percentage, so the exact split cannot be verified.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
  • Doesn't list turkey, venison, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids chicken: it is listed as an ingredient
  • Your dog avoids beef: it is listed as an ingredient
  • Your dog avoids lamb: it is listed as an ingredient
  • Your dog avoids fish: the label lists fish oil
  • Your dog avoids pork: it is listed as an ingredient
  • Your dog avoids grain: the label lists cereals
  • You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 21% · Fat 7%

Typical analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fed
Protein21%
Fat7%
Fibre3%
Ash7%

Additives & feeding info

Feeding and storage

Storage

Store in a cool dry place.

Feeding guide

Feed as a guide: Small (5-10kg) 30-175g, Medium (11-20kg) 175-240g, Large (21-30kg) 240-350g, Giant (31kg+) 350-450g daily, split into two equal meals. Adjust according to age, condition, weight and exercise. Introduce gradually over 4-7 days when feeding for the first time.

Additives declared on the label

Nutritional additives

Vitamin A 12,000IU/Kg; Vitamin D3 800IU/Kg; Vitamin E 60mg/kg; Iron (Iron (II) Sulphate Monohydrate) 80mg/kg; Zinc (Zinc Sulphate Monohydrate) 40mg; Manganese (Manganese Sulphate Monohydrate) 25mg/kg; Copper (Copper (II) Pentahydrate) 13mg/kg; Iodine (Calcium Iodate Anhydrous) 1.4mg/kg; Selenium (Sodium Selenite) 0.15mg/kg

Ingredients (9)100% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

  • carb 26.9%
  • meat 15.0%
  • other 14.0%
  • oil 13.2%
  • additive 12.0%
  • supplement 10.0%
  • unknown 9.0%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
1CerealsCerealscarb · poor-16.0
2Meat and Animal Derivatives (Beef, Chicken, Lamb & Pork)Meat and Animal Derivativesmeat · poor-15.0
3Derivatives of Vegetable OriginVegetable By-Productsother · poor-14.0
4Oils and FatsOils and Fatsoil · poor-13.0
50.25% fish oilFish Oiloil · good0.250.3
6Various SugarsSugarsadditive · poor-12.0
7Vegetable Protein ExtractsVegetable protein extractscarb · poor-11.0
8MineralsVitamins and mineralssupplement · medium-10.0
9Sweetcorn.unmatched--9.0
  1. 1. Cereals16.0% estimated
    Cereals · carb · poor
  2. 2. Meat and Animal Derivatives (Beef, Chicken, Lamb & Pork)15.0% estimated
  3. 3. Derivatives of Vegetable Origin14.0% estimated
    Vegetable By-Products · other · poor
  4. 4. Oils and Fats13.0% estimated
    Oils and Fats · oil · poor
  5. 5. 0.25% fish oil0.25% declared0.3% estimated
    Fish Oil · oil · good
  6. 6. Various Sugars12.0% estimated
    Sugars · additive · poor
  7. 7. Vegetable Protein Extracts11.0% estimated
  8. 8. Minerals10.0% estimated
    Vitamins and minerals · supplement · medium
  9. 9. Sweetcorn.9.0% estimated
    unmatched

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-14

Brand and contact: Wonderdog

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-14
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)
Product page
wonderdog.co.uk

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Why this score?

This recipe achieves a final score of 17 out of 100 based on several key factors. Ingredients without printed percentages reduced the score by -10.5. Furthermore, the overall quality of the ingredient list reduced the score by -6.8. The processing format also impacted the rating by -6.7, while lower-quality ingredients brought a deduction of -5.3.

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality-0.79.191-6.81
Carb share of dry matter32.7%-0.115-3.77
Oil share of dry matter18.1%-0.092-1.66
Additive share of dry matter14.9%0.163+2.42
Supplement share of dry matter12.7%-0.012-0.15
Other share of dry matter9.6%-0.375-3.61
Unrecognised share of dry matter6.2%-0.027-0.16
Recipe graded poor80.8%-0.065-5.25
Poor-quality meat in recipe15.0%-0.179-2.67
Number of poor ingredients6-0.876-5.26
Largest single poor ingredient16.0%0.060+0.96
Undeclared quantities99.8%-0.106-10.53
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
Additive penalty-16.700.222-3.71
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality-0.79.191-6.81
Meat share of dry matter0.0%0.096+0.00
Carb share of dry matter32.7%-0.115-3.77
Oil share of dry matter18.1%-0.092-1.66
Vegetable share of dry matter0.0%-0.005+0.00
Additive share of dry matter14.9%0.163+2.42
Supplement share of dry matter12.7%-0.012-0.15
Other share of dry matter9.6%-0.375-3.61
Unrecognised share of dry matter6.2%-0.027-0.16
Recipe graded poor80.8%-0.065-5.25
Poor-quality meat in recipe15.0%-0.179-2.67
Number of poor ingredients6-0.876-5.26
Largest single poor ingredient16.0%0.060+0.96
Undeclared quantities99.8%-0.106-10.53
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)no0.707+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty-16.700.222-3.71
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
+0.02
Additives declared on label
+1 transparency bonus
Subtotal
17.2
Final score
17/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v317/100current
v218/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein2123.2 (band 18 to 40%)84.2
Fat77.7 (band 5.5 to 20%)79.2
Fibre33.3 (band 0.5 to 5%)100

Scored over 3 declared nutrients (combined weight 50); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.

Declared fortification: 9 nutritional additives on the label
  • Vitamin A 12,000IU/Kg
  • Vitamin D3 800IU/Kg
  • Vitamin E 60mg/kg
  • Iron (Iron (II) Sulphate Monohydrate) 80mg/kg
  • Zinc (Zinc Sulphate Monohydrate) 40mg
  • Manganese (Manganese Sulphate Monohydrate) 25mg/kg
  • Copper (Copper (II) Pentahydrate) 13mg/kg
  • Iodine (Calcium Iodate Anhydrous) 1.4mg/kg
  • Selenium (Sodium Selenite) 0.15mg/kg

Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (0.3% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)0.1/20
✗ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file0/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)5/10
✗ Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file0/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✓ Feeding guidance given (mandatory)10/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.

Consistent with the label

  • "A complete, balanced recipe (21% protein / 7% fat) designed to support condition, energy, and overall health in active and working dogs." — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.

5 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.

Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
Supports muscle maintenance with quality protein sources (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Provides steady energy for active and working dogs (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Supports skin & coat with omega 3 & 6 oils (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Complete and balanced to support daily health and performance (on page)Nutrientnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Elevate your dog's vitality with Wonderdog High Gold: 21% protein, 7% fat, enriched with essential fatty acids. (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
A complete, balanced recipe (21% protein / 7% fat) designed to support condition, energy, and overall health in active and working dogs. (on page)ContentconsistentManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Alternatives to High Gold

Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.

See all alternatives

See all products from Wonderdog

Community0 comments

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.