Nutriment Fresh Medallions - Beef
Fresh Frozen · completeHigh meatClear label
Our verdict
Is Nutriment Fresh Medallions - Beef a good dog food?
We score it 63/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete frozen fresh food for dogs of all life stages, with muscle meat, beef tripe and beef kidney as the main ingredients.
77% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list chicken, turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids beef: the label lists beef tripe
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists salmon oil
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
- You are limiting fat: 28.8% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 15.20% · Fat 10.60%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 15.20% |
| Fat | 10.60% |
| Fibre | 1.33% |
| Ash | 3.04% |
| Moisture | 63.20% |
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Sold out Frozen Tax included.
Feeding guide
, please refer to the product images. Our minimum order for shipping is 5kg to keep the products frozen in transit. Order 7 x 800g to reach our minimum order. Get free shipping on subscription orders over £50 - or visit one of our retailers to purchase locally. Fresh from our kitchen. Enjoyed in your home. Nutriment Gently Cooked medallions are packed with essential nutrients. High meat content. No grains or filler. Just like homecooked, only from us. Add some treats to your order Raw Chicken 500g
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vit A 4310 I.U; Vit D3 431 I.U; Vit E 143 mg; Iron 22 mg; Iodine 1.1 mg; Copper 2.2 mg; Manganese 0.72 mg; Zinc 37 mg; Selenium 0.09 mg
Ingredients (13)77% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 74.0%
- oil 15.8%
- veg 10.2%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17 % muscle | Muscle Meat | meat · good | 17 | 17.0 |
| 2 | tripe | Beef Tripe | meat · medium | - | 13.0 |
| 3 | kidneys | Beef Kidney | meat · good | - | 13.0 |
| 4 | lungs | Beef lung | meat · medium | - | 13.0 |
| 5 | liver | Beef Liver | meat · good | - | 5.0 |
| 6 | heart | Beef Heart | meat · good | - | 13.0 |
| 7 | fat | Crude Fat | oil · medium | - | 13.0 |
| 8 | 3.4 % chicory | Chicory | veg · good | 3.4 | 3.4 |
| 9 | 3.0 % broccoli | Broccoli | veg · good | 3 | 3.0 |
| 10 | carrot | Carrots | veg · good | - | 2.0 |
| 11 | apple | Apples | veg · good | - | 1.8 |
| 12 | salmon oil | Salmon Oil | oil · good | - | 1.5 |
| 13 | hemp oil | Hemp Oil | oil · good | - | 1.3 |
- 1. 17 % muscle17% declared17.0% estimated
- 2. tripe13.0% estimated
- 3. kidneys13.0% estimated
- 4. lungs13.0% estimated
- 5. liver5.0% estimated
- 6. heart13.0% estimated
- 7. fat13.0% estimated
- 8. 3.4 % chicory3.4% declared3.4% estimated
- 9. 3.0 % broccoli3% declared3.0% estimated
- 10. carrot2.0% estimated
- 11. apple1.8% estimated
- 12. salmon oil1.5% estimated
- 13. hemp oil1.3% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-08-22
Brand and contact: Nutriment
- Website
- https://www.nutriment.co.uk/
- [email protected]
- Phone
- 01276 63554
- Address
- Units 10-12, Trade City Frimley, Lyon Way, Frimley, Camberley, Surrey, GU16 7AL
- Contact page
- www.nutriment.co.uk
- Social
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-08-22
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.nutriment.co.uk
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The overall score is 63 out of 100. Ingredients without printed percentages dragged the score down by -8.1 points, which was the biggest single factor in this case. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +6.6 points to lift the score. The oil and fat content reduced the score by -3.8 points, and the processing format reduced it by -2.4 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.7 | 9.191 | +6.60 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 12.6% | 0.096 | +1.21 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 41.3% | -0.092 | -3.80 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 4.0% | -0.005 | -0.02 |
| Undeclared quantities | 76.6% | -0.106 | -8.09 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.10 | 33.786 | +37.16 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | yes | -2.354 | -2.35 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.7 | 9.191 | +6.60 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 12.6% | 0.096 | +1.21 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.115 | +0.00 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 41.3% | -0.092 | -3.80 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 4.0% | -0.005 | -0.02 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.012 | +0.00 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 76.6% | -0.106 | -8.09 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.10 | 33.786 | +37.16 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | yes | -2.354 | -2.35 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -1.74
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 63.2
- Final score
- 63/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 15.2 | 41.3 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 10.6 | 28.8 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 1.33 | 3.6 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
Scored over 3 declared nutrients (combined weight 50); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 9 nutritional additives on the label
- Vit A 4310 I.U
- Vit D3 431 I.U
- Vit E 143 mg
- Iron 22 mg
- Iodine 1.1 mg
- Copper 2.2 mg
- Manganese 0.72 mg
- Zinc 37 mg
- Selenium 0.09 mg
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (23.4% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 4.7/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 2 checkable claims: 2 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "No grains or filler" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
- "grain-free" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
4 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| easily digestible (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Complete & Balanced (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| No grains or filler (on page) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| grain-free (on page) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| made from juicy beef, crisp chicory, and tender broccoli (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| High meat content (on page) | High/low level | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Fresh Medallions - Beef
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.