Kronch Optimal Puppy

Dry Extruded complete

Optimal Puppy
Poor
our rating

Is Kronch Optimal Puppy a good dog food?

We score it 44/100 (Poor). The main reasons are set out in "Why you might not" below, and every step of the calculation is shown under "How we calculated this score".

How we score

Why this score?

This recipe achieves an overall rating of 44 out of 100 based on several key factors. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +3.4 points to the total. However, the presence of ingredients without printed percentages reduced the score by -13.1. Furthermore, the processing format decreased the score by -7, and the carbohydrate content lowered the final result by -3.5.

Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.

100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

The Recipe score measures how attractive and transparent the declared ingredient list is. It is not, by itself, proof that the food is nutritionally appropriate for long-term feeding. The Nutritional and Evidence scores measure what we can verify towards that stronger claim.

Complete extruded dry food for puppies, with salmon, salmon protein and rice as the main ingredients.

Why you might choose it

  • Nutritionally complete: formulated to be fed as the whole diet.

Why you might not

  • 100% of the recipe mass has no printed percentage, so the exact split cannot be verified.

View the source page

Estimated composition

meat29.3%
carb28.4%
supplement20.3%
oil8.6%
fibre7.2%
veg6.3%

Typical analysis (as fed)

Protein
26%
Fat
17%
Fibre
3%
Ash
9%

Additives & feeding info

No additives recorded yet.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for puppies
  • Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, venison, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids fish: the label lists salmon
  • Your dog avoids pork: the label lists pork fat
  • Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - white
  • You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.

Ingredients (12)

#As declaredMatchedCategoryTierDeclared %Est. %
1Fresh SalmonSalmonmeatgood-10.8
2Salmon MealSalmon Proteinmeatgood-10.4
3RiceRice - whitecarbmedium-9.9
4MaizeMaize / Corncarbpoor-9.5
5BarleyBarleycarbmedium-9.0
6Pork FatPork Fatoilmedium-8.6
7Blood MealBlood Mealmeatpoor-8.1
8Brewer’s YeastBrewer's Yeastsupplementgood-7.7
9Beet PulpBeet Pulpfibremedium-7.2
10LecithinLecithinsupplementgood-6.8
11GarlicGarlicvegmedium-6.3
12Vitamins and MineralsVitamins and mineralssupplementmedium-5.9

Brand

Kronch logo
Phone
+44 (0) 1953 883701
Address
12 Ironside Way, Hingham, Norfolk. NR9 4LF
Contact page
www.kronch.co.uk

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-15
Scored with
Model v2 (methodology)
Product page
www.kronch.co.uk

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Scored with model v2 on 2026-09-22. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-32.336+32.34
Average ingredient quality0.39.915+3.38
Meat share of dry matter25.2%0.116+2.92
Carb share of dry matter31.4%-0.113-3.54
Oil share of dry matter10.7%-0.088-0.94
Supplement share of dry matter23.4%-0.009-0.21
Recipe graded poor17.6%-0.045-0.79
Poor-quality meat in recipe8.1%-0.182-1.48
Number of poor ingredients2-0.868-1.74
Largest single poor ingredient9.5%0.056+0.53
Undeclared quantities100.0%-0.131-13.09
Complete dietyes1.703+1.70
Processing multiplier1.0032.336+32.34
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.996-7.00
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-32.336+32.34
Average ingredient quality0.39.915+3.38
Meat share of dry matter25.2%0.116+2.92
Carb share of dry matter31.4%-0.113-3.54
Oil share of dry matter10.7%-0.088-0.94
Vegetable share of dry matter1.2%-0.002-0.00
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.177+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter23.4%-0.009-0.21
Other share of dry matter0.0%-0.371+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.022+0.00
Recipe graded poor17.6%-0.045-0.79
Poor-quality meat in recipe8.1%-0.182-1.48
Number of poor ingredients2-0.868-1.74
Largest single poor ingredient9.5%0.056+0.53
Undeclared quantities100.0%-0.131-13.09
Prints ingredient percentagesno3.194+0.00
Complete dietyes1.703+1.70
Frozen or chilled freshno11.440+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)no-0.506+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)no-1.988+0.00
High carb and low meatno-1.250+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.0-0.073+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.0-0.339+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.016.475+0.00
Additive penalty0.000.236+0.00
Processing multiplier1.0032.336+32.34
Processing: Rawno13.322+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno7.712+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno6.583+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno4.857+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno0.072+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno11.127+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno9.320+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno4.569+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-2.321+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.996-7.00
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.833+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.711+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno2.935+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno2.292+0.00
Processing-type offset
-0.01
Subtotal
44.4
Final score
44/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v244/100current
v144/100
v1.944/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for puppies and growth. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

Scored against FEDIAF growth minima; puppy scoring is under review.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein2628.3100
Fat1718.5100

Scored over 2 declared nutrients (combined weight 40); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 8% from the food type.

Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file0/20
Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file0/15
Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file0/10
Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file0/5
Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file0/10
Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)10/10
Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Additives declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The marketing claims made on the pack and product page, and how much evidence sits behind them. We record the claims as stated; we do not assess whether they are true.

ClaimTypeSubstantiation
promotes solid bone density, maximum muscle, eye, and coat development (on page)FunctionalManufacturer assertion
helping to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease, prevent allergies, hair loss, scratching, dull coat, dandruff, and dry skin (on page)FunctionalManufacturer assertion
hypoallergenic, lower protein puppy food made with easily digestible fresh salmon and rice (on page)ContentManufacturer assertion
free from preservatives or artificial colouring/flavouring (on page)Free-fromManufacturer assertion
high concentrate of rich Omega 3 and 6 fatty acids (on page)High/low levelManufacturer assertion

Limited: at least one claim rests on manufacturer assertion alone.

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Other products from Kronch

Alternatives to Optimal Puppy

Foods in our database that are similar on ingredients, protein, format or price. Scores and figures are from the same deterministic model used everywhere on the site.

See all alternatives

Community

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.