Our verdict
Is Bubeck Perfekt a good dog food?
We score it 37/100 (Poor). The main reasons are set out in "Why you might not" below, and every step of the calculation is shown under "How we calculated this score".
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Doesn't list lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists dehydrated poultry proteins
- Your dog avoids beef: the label lists beef fat
- Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists dehydrated poultry proteins
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists fish meal
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists wheat
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 26% · Fat 16%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 26% |
| Fat | 16% |
| Fibre | 3% |
| Ash | 8% |
| Calcium | 1.60% |
| Phosphorus | 0.90% |
Energy: 358 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Kühl und trocken lagern.
Feeding guide
2-5 kg: 55-90 g/Tag; 6-10 kg: 125-180 g/Tag; 11-23 kg: 210-300 g/Tag; 24-40 kg: 345-500 g/Tag. Trocken füttern oder mit Wasser anfeuchten. Frisches Trinkwasser bereithalten.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A 12.000 i.E./kg; Vitamin D3 1.200 i.E./kg; Vitamin E (alpha Tocopherolacetat) 45 mg/kg; Kupfer (Kupfer(II)sulfat) 6 mg/kg
Ingredients (14)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- unknown 30.2%
- carb 26.6%
- oil 15.0%
- meat 12.3%
- supplement 11.0%
- additive 5.0%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wheat | Wheat | carb · poor | - | 9.3 |
| 2 | Wheat Flour | Wheat | carb · poor | - | 9.0 |
| 3 | Greaves | Greaves | meat · poor | - | 8.6 |
| 4 | Maize | Maize / Corn | carb · medium | - | 8.3 |
| 5 | Poultry Fat | Poultry Fat | oil · medium | - | 8.0 |
| 6 | Poultry Meal | Dehydrated Poultry Proteins | meat · good | - | 7.6 |
| 7 | Haemoglobin Powder | Hemoglobin | meat · medium | - | 7.3 |
| 8 | Beef Fat | Beef Fat | oil · medium | - | 7.0 |
| 9 | Sugar Beet Molasses Shreds | Sugar Beet | carb · medium | - | 6.6 |
| 10 | Fish Meal | Fish Meal | meat · medium | - | 6.3 |
| 11 | Liver Hydrolysate | Liver Hydrolysate | meat · medium | - | 6.0 |
| 12 | Dicalcium Phosphate | Dicalcium phosphate | supplement · medium | - | 5.6 |
| 13 | Calcium Carbonate | Calcium Carbonate | supplement · medium | - | 5.3 |
| 14 | Sodium Chloride | Salt | additive · poor | - | 5.0 |
- 1. Wheat9.3% estimated
- 2. Wheat Flour9.0% estimated
- 3. Greaves8.6% estimated
- 4. Maize8.3% estimated
- 5. Poultry Fat8.0% estimated
- 6. Poultry Meal7.6% estimated
- 7. Haemoglobin Powder7.3% estimated
- 8. Beef Fat7.0% estimated
- 9. Sugar Beet Molasses Shreds6.6% estimated
- 10. Fish Meal6.3% estimated
- 11. Liver Hydrolysate6.0% estimated
- 12. Dicalcium Phosphate5.6% estimated
- 13. Calcium Carbonate5.3% estimated
- 14. Sodium Chloride5.0% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-19
Brand and contact: Bubeck
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-19
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.bubeck-petfood.de
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 3.4/5 · 10 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves an overall score of 37 out of 100. Being labelled nutritionally complete adds +2.3 points to the total. However, ingredients without printed percentages deducts -10.6, the processing format takes away -6.7, and the carbohydrate content reduces the score by -3.6.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.0 | 9.191 | +0.01 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 31.0% | -0.115 | -3.57 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 19.6% | -0.092 | -1.81 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 6.0% | 0.163 | +0.97 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 13.4% | -0.012 | -0.16 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 20.1% | -0.027 | -0.53 |
| Recipe graded poor | 23.3% | -0.065 | -1.51 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 3 | -0.876 | -2.63 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 9.3% | 0.060 | +0.56 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -6.08 | 0.222 | -1.35 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.0 | 9.191 | +0.01 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 31.0% | -0.115 | -3.57 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 19.6% | -0.092 | -1.81 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.005 | +0.00 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 6.0% | 0.163 | +0.97 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 13.4% | -0.012 | -0.16 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 20.1% | -0.027 | -0.53 |
| Recipe graded poor | 23.3% | -0.065 | -1.51 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 3 | -0.876 | -2.63 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 9.3% | 0.060 | +0.56 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -6.08 | 0.222 | -1.35 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 36.9
- Final score
- 37/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 26 | 28.7 (band 18 to 40%) | 99.3 |
| Fat | 16 | 17.7 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 3 | 3.3 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Calcium | 1.6 | 1.8 (band 0.5 to 2.5%) | 100 |
| Phosphorus | 0.9 | 1 (band 0.4 to 1.6%) | 99.7 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.8 | 1.8 (band 1 to 2%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 358 | 395.6 | 100 |
Scored over 7 declared nutrients (combined weight 90); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.
Declared fortification: 4 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin A 12.000 i.E./kg
- Vitamin D3 1.200 i.E./kg
- Vitamin E (alpha Tocopherolacetat) 45 mg/kg
- Kupfer (Kupfer(II)sulfat) 6 mg/kg
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "Alleinfuttermittel für erwachsene Hunde aller Rassen" — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.
9 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mit Vitaminen und Mineralstoffen gegen Mangelerscheinungen. (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| die ideale Nahrung für alle Hunde mit erhöhtem Energie- und Proteinbedarf (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Unterstützt das Wachstum, Regeneration und den Erhalt von Muskeln und Zellen (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Wichtige Quelle für Energie, sorgt für eine gesunde Haut und glänzendes Fell (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Reguliert die Verdauung (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Essenziell für Knochen, Zähne und die Blutgerinnung (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Essenziell für Knochen, Zähne und Bewegung (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Alleinfuttermittel für erwachsene Hunde aller Rassen (on pack) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Wichtige Mineralstoffe (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Mit einem hohen Anteil an sehr gut verdaulichem tierischen Eiweiß aus Geflügel- und Rindfleisch, für den gesunden Aufbau und Erhalt der Körpersubstanzen. (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Perfekt
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.