Almo Nature Daily with Tuna and Cod

Wet Chunks · completeClear label

55out of 100

Average

our rating

Our verdict

Is Almo Nature Daily with Tuna and Cod a good dog food?

We score it 55/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.

Complete wet food in chunks for adult dogs, with meat and animal derivatives, fish and fish derivatives and tuna as the main ingredients.

How we score

48% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

Why you might choose it

Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
Doesn't list grain ingredients.
High in protein: 50% protein on a dry-matter basis.

Why you might not

2 poor-graded ingredients make up about 44% of the recipe.
High in fat: 29% fat on a dry-matter basis.

Who is this food for?

Suits

Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

Your dog avoids fish: the label lists fish and fish derivatives
You are limiting fat: 29.4% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 8.50% · Fat 5%

Typical analysis (as fed)

Nutrient	As fed
Protein	8.50%
Fat	5%
Fibre	0.50%
Ash	2%
Moisture	83%

Energy: 80.1 kcal/100g

Additives & feeding info

Additives declared on the label

Nutritional additives

iodine 0.4 µg (3b203); manganese 0.8 mg (3b503); zinc 19 mg (3b605); copper 1.3 mg (3b405); taurine 519 mg (3a370)

Ingredients (5)48% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

meat 52.0%
supplement 48.0%

#	As declared	Matched	Label reading	Declared %	Est. %
1	Meat and animal derivatives 43%	Meat and Animal Derivatives	meat · poor	43	43.0
2	1% fish and fish derivatives	Fish and fish derivatives	meat · poor	1	1.0
3	tuna 4%	Tuna	meat · good	4	4.0
4	cod 4%	Cod	meat · good	4	4.0
5	minerals	Vitamins and minerals	supplement · medium	-	48.0

1. Meat and animal derivatives 43%43% declared43.0% estimated
Meat and Animal Derivatives · meat · poor
2. 1% fish and fish derivatives1% declared1.0% estimated
Fish and fish derivatives · meat · poor
3. tuna 4%4% declared4.0% estimated
Tuna · meat · good
4. cod 4%4% declared4.0% estimated
Cod · meat · good
5. minerals48.0% estimated
Vitamins and minerals · supplement · medium

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-12

Brand and contact: Almo Nature

Website: https://www.almonature.com/en/
Phone: +39 010 25 35 400
Address: Piazza dei Giustiniani, 6, 16123 Genova, Italy

Trust and provenance

Recall history: No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked: 2026-09-12
Scored with: Model v3 (methodology)
Product page: www.almonature.com

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Brand and retailer reviews

External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.

Trustpilot: 2.9/5 · 4 reviews

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Why this score?

The overall score is 55 out of 100. The meat content contributed +2.4 points, helping to lift the rating. Lower-quality meat ingredients reduced the score by -7.9, and ingredients without printed percentages took off another -5.1. Lower-quality ingredients also had an impact, subtracting -2.9 points.

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

Component	Input	Coefficient	Contribution
Base score	-	30.909	+30.91
Average ingredient quality	0.2	9.191	+1.88
Meat share of dry matter	24.8%	0.096	+2.38
Supplement share of dry matter	75.2%	-0.012	-0.92
Recipe graded poor	44.0%	-0.065	-2.86
Poor-quality meat in recipe	44.0%	-0.179	-7.86
Number of poor ingredients	2	-0.876	-1.75
Largest single poor ingredient	43.0%	0.060	+2.58
Undeclared quantities	48.0%	-0.106	-5.07
Complete diet	yes	2.294	+2.29
Additive penalty	-3.44	0.222	-0.76
Processing multiplier	1.00	33.786	+33.79
Processing: Wet Chunks	yes	-0.672	-0.67

Show all 40 components

Component	Input	Coefficient	Contribution
Base score	-	30.909	+30.91
Average ingredient quality	0.2	9.191	+1.88
Meat share of dry matter	24.8%	0.096	+2.38
Carb share of dry matter	0.0%	-0.115	+0.00
Oil share of dry matter	0.0%	-0.092	+0.00
Vegetable share of dry matter	0.0%	-0.005	+0.00
Additive share of dry matter	0.0%	0.163	+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter	75.2%	-0.012	-0.92
Other share of dry matter	0.0%	-0.375	+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter	0.0%	-0.027	+0.00
Recipe graded poor	44.0%	-0.065	-2.86
Poor-quality meat in recipe	44.0%	-0.179	-7.86
Number of poor ingredients	2	-0.876	-1.75
Largest single poor ingredient	43.0%	0.060	+2.58
Undeclared quantities	48.0%	-0.106	-5.07
Prints ingredient percentages	no	0.000	+0.00
Complete diet	yes	2.294	+2.29
Frozen or chilled fresh	no	0.000	+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)	no	0.707	+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)	no	-3.158	+0.00
High carb and low meat	no	-1.180	+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages	0.0	0.000	+0.00
Meat share × fresh	0.0	0.000	+0.00
Fresh × high meat	0.0	11.084	+0.00
Additive penalty	-3.44	0.222	-0.76
Processing multiplier	1.00	33.786	+33.79
Processing: Raw	no	-0.054	+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilled	no	-2.354	+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozen	no	-2.354	+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigerated	no	0.000	+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelf	no	-0.672	+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Dried	no	6.629	+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Dried	no	6.331	+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressed	no	-6.713	+0.00
Processing: Dry Baked	no	-6.713	+0.00
Processing: Dry Extruded	no	-6.713	+0.00
Processing: Dry Semi Moist	no	-6.174	+0.00
Processing: Dry Muesli	no	-10.146	+0.00
Processing: Wet Pate	no	-0.672	+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunks	yes	-0.672	-0.67

Processing-type offset: -0.08
Additives declared on label: +1 transparency bonus
Subtotal: 54.9
Final score: 55/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

Model	Score
v3	55/100	current
v2	59/100

Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

Nutrient	As fed (label)	Dry matter (scored)	Score
Protein	8.5	50 (band 21.20294117647059 to 40%)	100
Fat	5	29.4 (band 6.478676470588235 to 20%)	100
Fibre	0.5	2.9 (band 0.5 to 5%)	100
Energy (kcal/100g)	80.1	471.2	100

Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.

Declared fortification: 5 nutritional additives on the label

iodine 0.4 µg (3b203)
manganese 0.8 mg (3b503)
zinc 19 mg (3b605)
copper 1.3 mg (3b405)
taurine 519 mg (3a370)

Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

Item	Points
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)	10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (52% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)	10.4/20
✓ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory)	15/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)	5/10
✓ Energy value declared (voluntary)	5/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)	5/5
✗ Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file	0/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)	10/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)	10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file	0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.

Consistent with the label

"Grain Free Recipes with no added grain. Ideal for those who choose a product without added cereals" — supported by the declared grain-free data.

Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.

Claim	Type	Check	Substantiation
Grain Free Recipes with no added grain. Ideal for those who choose a product without added cereals (on page)	Free-from	consistent	Manufacturer assertion source

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.