Asda Working Dog with Chicken Pâté
Wet Pate · completeHigh meatClear label
Our verdict
Is Asda Working Dog with Chicken Pâté a good dog food?
We score it 57/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete wet paté food for adult dogs, with meat and animal derivatives, vitamins and minerals and oils and fats as the main ingredients.
40% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: it is listed as an ingredient
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists fish oil
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
- You are limiting fat: 33.3% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 10.50% · Fat 7%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 10.50% |
| Fat | 7% |
| Fibre | 0.40% |
| Ash | 2% |
| Moisture | 79% |
Energy: 105 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Store in a cool, dry place. Once opened transfer contents to a lidded container, store in the fridge and use within 2 days. Storage Type: Ambient.
Feeding guide
Feed at room temperature. Dogs 5kg to 10kg: 1.5–3 trays per day; dogs 10kg to 20kg: 3–5 trays per day; dogs 20kg to 30kg: 5–6.5 trays per day. Adjust according to age, breed, activity level and body condition. Fresh drinking water should always be available. Allow a transition phase when switching diet.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin E 30 mg/kg; Vitamin D₃ 140 IU/kg; Copper (Copper (II) Sulphate Pentahydrate) 0.5 mg/kg; Zinc (Zinc Sulphate Monohydrate) 12 mg/kg; Manganese (Manganese (II) Oxide) 1.0 mg/kg; Iodine (Calcium Iodate Anhydrous) 0.3 mg/kg
Ingredients (6)40% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 60.0%
- supplement 15.9%
- oil 13.4%
- other 10.6%
- veg 0.1%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Meat and Animal Derivatives (60%) | Meat and Animal Derivatives | meat · poor | 60 | 60.0 |
| 2 | Minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 15.9 |
| 3 | Oils and Fats | Oils and Fats | oil · poor | - | 13.2 |
| 4 | 0.2% Fish Oil | Fish Oil | oil · good | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| 5 | Derivatives of Vegetable Origin | Vegetable By-Products | other · poor | - | 10.6 |
| 6 | 0.1% Chicory | Chicory | veg · good | 0.1 | 0.1 |
- 1. Meat and Animal Derivatives (60%)60% declared60.0% estimated
- 2. Minerals15.9% estimated
- 3. Oils and Fats13.2% estimated
- 4. 0.2% Fish Oil0.2% declared0.2% estimated
- 5. Derivatives of Vegetable Origin10.6% estimated
- 6. 0.1% Chicory0.1% declared0.1% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-12
Brand and contact: Asda
- Contact page
- groceries.asda.com
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-12
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- groceries.asda.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
5 reviews on this product · 4.8/5
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
We score products out of 100 based on how their declared ingredients add up. The meat content contributed +3.2 points, which helped lift the overall score. However, ingredients without printed percentages reduced the score by -4.2, the remaining ingredients by -4, and the oil and fat content by -2.4. Together these factors produced a final score of 57 out of 100.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | -0.0 | 9.191 | -0.46 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 33.6% | 0.096 | +3.22 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 26.6% | -0.092 | -2.45 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 29.2% | -0.012 | -0.36 |
| Other share of dry matter | 10.6% | -0.375 | -3.97 |
| Recipe graded poor | 23.8% | -0.065 | -1.55 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.876 | -1.75 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 13.2% | 0.060 | +0.79 |
| Undeclared quantities | 39.7% | -0.106 | -4.19 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | -0.0 | 9.191 | -0.46 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 33.6% | 0.096 | +3.22 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.115 | +0.00 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 26.6% | -0.092 | -2.45 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.005 | -0.00 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 29.2% | -0.012 | -0.36 |
| Other share of dry matter | 10.6% | -0.375 | -3.97 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 23.8% | -0.065 | -1.55 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.876 | -1.75 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 13.2% | 0.060 | +0.79 |
| Undeclared quantities | 39.7% | -0.106 | -4.19 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 57.2
- Final score
- 57/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 10.5 | 50 (band 22.5 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 7 | 33.3 (band 6.875 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 0.4 | 1.9 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 88.7 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 105 | 500 | 100 |
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 6 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin E 30 mg/kg
- Vitamin D₃ 140 IU/kg
- Copper (Copper (II) Sulphate Pentahydrate) 0.5 mg/kg
- Zinc (Zinc Sulphate Monohydrate) 12 mg/kg
- Manganese (Manganese (II) Oxide) 1.0 mg/kg
- Iodine (Calcium Iodate Anhydrous) 0.3 mg/kg
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (60.3% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 12.1/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) | 5/5 |
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "Complete & Balanced Nutrition" — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.
2 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Suitable for Up to 30kg (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| No Added Artificial Colours or Flavours (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Complete & Balanced Nutrition (on page) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Working Dog with Chicken Pâté
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.