Working Dog Food Company Hypoallergenic Chicken & Rice
Dry Extruded · completeHigh meat
Our verdict
Is Working Dog Food Company Hypoallergenic Chicken & Rice a good dog food?
We score it 62/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete extruded dry food for adult dogs, with dehydrated poultry proteins, rice and maize as the main ingredients.
62% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Doesn't list beef, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists dehydrated poultry proteins
- Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists dehydrated poultry proteins
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists fish meal
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - white
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 30% · Fat 18%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 30% |
| Fat | 18% |
| Fibre | 2% |
| Ash | 7.50% |
| Moisture | 7% |
| Carbohydrates | 35.50% |
| Omega-3 fatty acids | 0.78% |
| Omega-6 fatty acids | 3.54% |
| Calcium | 1.80% |
| Phosphorus | 1.10% |
Energy: 380 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
Weight of Cat (kg) Under 2.5: 25-45g per Day, 2.5-3.5: 45-55g per Day, 3.5-5: 55-70g per Day, 5+: 70+g per Day
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A (as retinyl acetate) 19,656 IU/kg; Vitamin D3 (as cholecalciferol) 1,367 IU/kg; Biotin 260 mcg/kg; Zinc Chelate of Amino Acids Hydrate 356 mg/kg; Zinc Sulphate Monohydrate 296 mg/kg; Ferrous Sulphate Monohydrate 321 mg/kg; Ferrous Chelate of Amino Acids Hydrate 21 mg/kg; Manganous Sulphate Monohydrate 117 mg/kg; Cupric Chelate of Amino Acids Hydrate 53 mg/kg; Cupric Sulphate Pentahydrate 42 mg/kg; Calcium Iodate Anhydrous 1.64 mg/kg; Sodium Selenite 0.53 mg/kg; Taurine 700 mg/kg
Ingredients (10)62% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 57.2%
- carb 17.2%
- oil 12.8%
- fibre 7.4%
- supplement 5.4%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Poultry Meal (38%) | Dehydrated Poultry Proteins | meat · good | 38 | 38.0 |
| 2 | Rice | Rice - white | carb · medium | - | 8.9 |
| 3 | Maize | Maize / Corn | carb · medium | - | 8.4 |
| 4 | Poultry Fat | Poultry Fat | oil · medium | - | 7.9 |
| 5 | Sugar Beet Pulp | Beet Pulp | fibre · medium | - | 7.4 |
| 6 | Chicken Stock | Chicken Broth | meat · medium | - | 6.9 |
| 7 | Egg Powder | Dried Whole Egg | meat · good | - | 6.4 |
| 8 | Fish Meal | Fish Meal | meat · medium | - | 5.9 |
| 9 | Brewers Yeast | Brewer's Yeast | supplement · good | - | 5.4 |
| 10 | Salmon Oil | Salmon Oil | oil · good | - | 4.9 |
- 1. Poultry Meal (38%)38% declared38.0% estimated
- 2. Rice8.9% estimated
- 3. Maize8.4% estimated
- 4. Poultry Fat7.9% estimated
- 5. Sugar Beet Pulp7.4% estimated
- 6. Chicken Stock6.9% estimated
- 7. Egg Powder6.4% estimated
- 8. Fish Meal5.9% estimated
- 9. Brewers Yeast5.4% estimated
- 10. Salmon Oil4.9% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-02
Brand and contact: Working Dog Food Company
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-02
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.workingdogfoodcompany.co.uk
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 4.3/5 · 36 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves a total score of 62 out of 100 based on several key factors. The meat content contributed +3.9 points, while the overall quality of the ingredient list added +6.4 points. Conversely, the processing format subtracted -6.7 points, and ingredients without printed percentages reduced the score by -6.5 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.7 | 9.191 | +6.43 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 40.5% | 0.096 | +3.89 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 17.6% | -0.115 | -2.02 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 14.7% | -0.092 | -1.35 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 5.8% | -0.012 | -0.07 |
| Undeclared quantities | 62.0% | -0.106 | -6.55 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.7 | 9.191 | +6.43 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 40.5% | 0.096 | +3.89 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 17.6% | -0.115 | -2.02 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 14.7% | -0.092 | -1.35 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.005 | +0.00 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 5.8% | -0.012 | -0.07 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 62.0% | -0.106 | -6.55 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 61.7
- Final score
- 62/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 30 | 32.3 (band 18.387096774193548 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 18 | 19.4 (band 5.618279569892473 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 2 | 2.2 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 92 |
| Calcium | 1.8 | 1.9 (band 0.510752688172043 to 2.5%) | 100 |
| Phosphorus | 1.1 | 1.2 (band 0.40860215053763443 to 1.6%) | 100 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.6 | 1.6 (band 1 to 2%) | 100 |
| Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3) | - | - | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 380 | 408.6 | 100 |
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.
Scored over 8 declared nutrients (combined weight 100); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 13 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin A (as retinyl acetate) 19,656 IU/kg
- Vitamin D3 (as cholecalciferol) 1,367 IU/kg
- Biotin 260 mcg/kg
- Zinc Chelate of Amino Acids Hydrate 356 mg/kg
- Zinc Sulphate Monohydrate 296 mg/kg
- Ferrous Sulphate Monohydrate 321 mg/kg
- Ferrous Chelate of Amino Acids Hydrate 21 mg/kg
- Manganous Sulphate Monohydrate 117 mg/kg
- Cupric Chelate of Amino Acids Hydrate 53 mg/kg
- Cupric Sulphate Pentahydrate 42 mg/kg
- Calcium Iodate Anhydrous 1.64 mg/kg
- Sodium Selenite 0.53 mg/kg
- Taurine 700 mg/kg
High confidence: full analysis plus minerals or omegas and declared energy.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (38% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 7.6/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beet Pulp – A good source of soluble and insoluble dietary fibre which are important for maintaining normal intestinal transit time and motility (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Pre-biotics MOS (Mannan- oligosaccharides) & FOS (Fructo- oligosaccharides) which may help to promote the growth of healthy gut bacteria and thus aid digestion (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Contains Omega 3 & 6 essential fatty acids, Zinc and Biotin to help maintain a healthy skin & coat (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| With added Taurine to maintain a healthy heart and vision (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Hypoallergenic Chicken & Rice
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.