Wonderdog Original Classic with Real Beef & Complete Health Blend
Dry Extruded · complete
Our verdict
Is Wonderdog Original Classic with Real Beef & Complete Health Blend a good dog food?
We score it 39/100 (Poor). The main reasons are set out in "Why you might not" below, and every step of the calculation is shown under "How we calculated this score".
Complete extruded dry food for adult dogs, with cereals, meat and animal derivatives and vegetable by as the main ingredients.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Doesn't list turkey, venison, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: it is listed as an ingredient
- Your dog avoids beef: the label lists beef
- Your dog avoids lamb: it is listed as an ingredient
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists fish oil
- Your dog avoids pork: it is listed as an ingredient
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists cereals
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 24% · Fat 12%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 24% |
| Fat | 12% |
| Fibre | 3.50% |
| Ash | 11% |
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Store in a cool dry place.
Feeding guide
Split recommended feeding quantity into two equal meals (morning and afternoon). Can be fed dry or moistened by soaking with hot water and leaving to expand. Introduce gradually over 4 days. Adjust for age, condition, weight and exercise. Always ensure clean water is available. Add extra 90-120g per day for nursing dogs.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A 17,000 i.u./kg; Vitamin D 1,500 i.u./kg; Vitamin E 70 mg/kg; Calcium Iodate Anhydrous 4 mg/kg; Sodium Selenite 0.2 mg/kg; Cupric Sulphate Pentahydrate 32 mg/kg; Ferrous Sulphate Monohydrate 200 mg/kg; Manganous Oxide 81 mg/kg; Zinc Oxide 139 mg/kg
Technological additives
Colourants; Antioxidants; Preservatives
Ingredients (13)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- veg 35.8%
- meat 17.6%
- carb 12.7%
- supplement 9.2%
- additive 9.1%
- oil 4.5%
- other 4.4%
- mineral 3.4%
- fibre 3.3%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cereals | Cereals | carb · poor | - | 10.8 |
| 2 | Meat and Animal Derivatives (Beef, Chicken, Lamb & Pork) | Meat and Animal Derivatives | meat · poor | - | 10.3 |
| 3 | Derivatives of Vegetable Origin | Vegetable By-Products | other · poor | - | 9.9 |
| 4 | Oils and Fats | Oils and Fats | oil · poor | - | 9.4 |
| 5 | 0.25% fish oil | Fish Oil | oil · good | 0.25 | 0.3 |
| 6 | Various Sugars | Sugars | additive · poor | - | 9.0 |
| 7 | Vegetable Protein Extracts | Vegetable protein extracts | carb · poor | - | 8.5 |
| 8 | Minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 8.1 |
| 9 | Dried Beef Pieces | Beef | meat · medium | - | 7.6 |
| 10 | PNP Herb Blend (Seaweed Coarse, Ground Micronized Maize, Carrot Powder, Thyme, Fennel, Peppermint Powder, Limestone Granules, Glucosamine HCL, Carob Powder 5, Biopets Yucca Powder, Turmeric Powder, Dandelion Root Power Organic, Ginger Powder, Aniseed Fenugreek Extra, Oregano Herb, Chondroitin Sulphate Avian, Ecological Paprika) | Herbs | veg · medium | - | 7.2 |
| 11 | Additives: Colourants | Artificial colourings | additive · poor | - | 6.7 |
| 12 | Antioxidants | Antioxidants | additive · medium | - | 6.3 |
| 13 | Preservatives | Preservatives | additive · medium | - | 5.8 |
- 1. Cereals10.8% estimated
- 2. Meat and Animal Derivatives (Beef, Chicken, Lamb & Pork)10.3% estimated
- 3. Derivatives of Vegetable Origin9.9% estimated
- 4. Oils and Fats9.4% estimated
- 5. 0.25% fish oil0.25% declared0.3% estimated
- 6. Various Sugars9.0% estimated
- 7. Vegetable Protein Extracts8.5% estimated
- 8. Minerals8.1% estimated
- 9. Dried Beef Pieces7.6% estimated
- 10. PNP Herb Blend (Seaweed Coarse, Ground Micronized Maize, Carrot Powder, Thyme, Fennel, Peppermint Powder, Limestone Granules, Glucosamine HCL, Carob Powder 5, Biopets Yucca Powder, Turmeric Powder, Dandelion Root Power Organic, Ginger Powder, Aniseed Fenugreek Extra, Oregano Herb, Chondroitin Sulphate Avian, Ecological Paprika)7.2% estimated
- 11. Additives: Colourants6.7% estimated
- 12. Antioxidants6.3% estimated
- 13. Preservatives5.8% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-13
Brand and contact: Wonderdog
- Website
- https://www.wonderdog.co.uk/
- [email protected]
- Phone
- 01724 872 448
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-13
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- wonderdog.co.uk
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves an overall rating of 39 out of 100 based on several key factors. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +2.7 points to the total. However, ingredients without printed percentages reduced the score by -10.5, the processing format subtracted -6.7, and the additive load contributed -2.6 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.3 | 9.191 | +2.72 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 15.8% | -0.115 | -1.81 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 6.3% | -0.092 | -0.58 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 31.7% | -0.005 | -0.16 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 11.6% | 0.163 | +1.90 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 12.0% | -0.012 | -0.15 |
| Other share of dry matter | 3.1% | -0.375 | -1.16 |
| Recipe graded poor | 26.2% | -0.065 | -1.70 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 4.6% | -0.179 | -0.82 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 6 | -0.876 | -5.26 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 4.7% | 0.060 | +0.28 |
| Undeclared quantities | 99.8% | -0.106 | -10.53 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -11.80 | 0.222 | -2.62 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.3 | 9.191 | +2.72 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 15.8% | -0.115 | -1.81 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 6.3% | -0.092 | -0.58 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 31.7% | -0.005 | -0.16 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 11.6% | 0.163 | +1.90 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 12.0% | -0.012 | -0.15 |
| Other share of dry matter | 3.1% | -0.375 | -1.16 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 26.2% | -0.065 | -1.70 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 4.6% | -0.179 | -0.82 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 6 | -0.876 | -5.26 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 4.7% | 0.060 | +0.28 |
| Undeclared quantities | 99.8% | -0.106 | -10.53 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -11.80 | 0.222 | -2.62 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 38.6
- Final score
- 39/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 24 | 26.5 (band 18 to 40%) | 93.2 |
| Fat | 12 | 13.3 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 3.5 | 3.9 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
Scored over 3 declared nutrients (combined weight 50); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.
Declared fortification: 9 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin A 17,000 i.u./kg
- Vitamin D 1,500 i.u./kg
- Vitamin E 70 mg/kg
- Calcium Iodate Anhydrous 4 mg/kg
- Sodium Selenite 0.2 mg/kg
- Cupric Sulphate Pentahydrate 32 mg/kg
- Ferrous Sulphate Monohydrate 200 mg/kg
- Manganous Oxide 81 mg/kg
- Zinc Oxide 139 mg/kg
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (0.3% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 0.1/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
50/100 · limited — 2 checkable claims: 1 consistent, 1 contradicted.
Contradicted by the label
- "High energy formula — 12% fat provides a rich, sustained energy source" — the declared label says otherwise on high fat.
Consistent with the label
- "complete, energy-rich working dog food" — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.
7 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Limited: at least one claim contradicts the declared label, or a recent upheld ASA ruling applies.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supports muscle maintenance & stamina — 24% quality protein (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Joint support & mobility — Glucosamine and Chondroitin Sulphate to support healthy joints and cartilage, combined with Turmeric and Ginger as natural anti-inflammatories to help reduce stiffness (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Fresh breath & dental health — Peppermint, Thyme, Fennel and Seaweed (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Digestive & gut health — Dandelion Root as a natural prebiotic, alongside Yucca Extract, Fennel and Ginger (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Healthy skin & coat — Omega 3 & 6 fish oils combined with Seaweed and Carrot Powder (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Immune support — Oregano and Thyme provide natural antimicrobial and antioxidant properties (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 24% protein and 12% fat to fuel performance and maintain muscle condition (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| High energy formula — 12% fat provides a rich, sustained energy source (on page) | High/low level | contradicted | Manufacturer assertion |
| complete, energy-rich working dog food (on page) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Original Classic with Real Beef & Complete Health Blend
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.