Wolf of Wilderness Soft "Green Fields" - Lamb
Dry Extruded · completeClear label
Our verdict
Is Wolf of Wilderness Soft "Green Fields" - Lamb a good dog food?
We score it 60/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
39% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list beef, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken
- Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists dehydrated poultry proteins
- Your dog avoids lamb: the label lists lamb
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists fish oil
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
- You are limiting fat: 20.1% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 26% · Fat 16.50%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 26% |
| Fat | 16.50% |
| Fibre | 2% |
| Ash | 6.90% |
| Moisture | 18% |
| Calcium | 1% |
| Phosphorus | 0.65% |
Energy: 359.1 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
Complete food for adult dogs. Daily amount (g): 3kg: 60-85; 5kg: 90-120; 10kg: 150-205; 20kg: 250-340; 30kg: 340-465; 40kg: 420-575; 50kg: 495-680; 60kg: 570-780; 80kg: 710-970. Feed as dry food; fresh water available at all times. Adjust to age, breed, activity and condition. Divide into two meals if possible.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A 15,000 IU; vitamin D3 1200 IU; vitamin E (all-rac-alpha-tocopheryl acetate) 150mg; vitamin C 100mg; vitamin B1 13mg; vitamin B2 (riboflavin) 12.5mg; vitamin B6 (pyridoxine hydrochloride) 8.5mg; vitamin B12 160mcg; niacin 53mg; calcium-D-pantothenate 31mg; biotin 690mcg; choline chloride 2300mg; copper (as cupric-(II)-sulphate, pentahydrate) 10mg; zinc (as zinc oxide) 90mg; zinc (as zinc chelate of amino acids hydrate) 45mg; iodine (as calcium iodate anhydrous) 2mg; selenium (as sodium selenite) 0.2mg
Technological additives
Antioxidants (tocopherol extracts from vegetable oils)
Ingredients (30)39% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 45.3%
- veg 24.6%
- carb 21.2%
- oil 5.2%
- other 2.1%
- supplement 1.6%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fresh Lamb (21%) | Lamb | meat · medium | 21 | 21.0 |
| 2 | Chicken (20%) | Chicken | meat · medium | 20 | 20.0 |
| 3 | Sweet Potato (19%) | Sweet Potatoes | carb · good | 19 | 19.0 |
| 4 | Dried Poultry Protein | Dehydrated Poultry Proteins | meat · good | - | 2.2 |
| 5 | Dried Potato | Potatoes | carb · medium | - | 2.2 |
| 6 | Protein Hydrolysate | Protein Hydrolysate | other · poor | - | 2.1 |
| 7 | Peas | Peas | veg · good | - | 2.1 |
| 8 | Chicken Liver | Chicken Liver | meat · good | - | 2.1 |
| 9 | Dried Forest Berries | Wild Berry | veg · good | - | 2.0 |
| 10 | 0.3% Lingonberries | Lingonberries | veg · good | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| 11 | Blueberries | Blueberries | veg · good | - | 2.0 |
| 12 | Elderberries | Dried Elderberries | veg · good | - | 1.9 |
| 13 | Dried Herbs | Herbs | veg · medium | - | 1.9 |
| 14 | 0.2% Stinging Nettle | Nettles | veg · good | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| 15 | Blackberry Leaves | Blackberry Leaves | veg · good | - | 1.8 |
| 16 | Common Yarrow | Yarrow | veg · good | - | 1.8 |
| 17 | Fennel | Fennel | veg · good | - | 1.7 |
| 18 | Caraway | Caraway | veg · good | - | 1.7 |
| 19 | Chamomile | Chamomile | veg · good | - | 1.6 |
| 20 | Mistletoe Leaves | Mistletoe | veg · medium | - | 1.6 |
| 21 | Gentian Root | Dried Gentian Root | veg · good | - | 1.5 |
| 22 | Centaury | Dried Centaury | veg · good | - | 1.5 |
| 23 | Yeast | Yeast | supplement · good | - | 1.4 |
| 24 | 0.15% Mannan Oligosaccharides | Mannanoligosaccharides | supplement · good | 0.15 | 0.1 |
| 25 | 0.05% Beta-Glucans | Beta-Glucans | supplement · good | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| 26 | Fish Oil | Fish Oil | oil · good | - | 1.4 |
| 27 | Poultry Fat | Poultry Fat | oil · medium | - | 1.3 |
| 28 | Sunflower Oil | Sunflower oil | oil · good | - | 1.3 |
| 29 | Safflower Oil | Safflower Oil | oil · good | - | 1.2 |
| 30 | Dried Chicory (source of inulin) | Chicory | veg · good | - | 1.2 |
- 1. Fresh Lamb (21%)21% declared21.0% estimated
- 2. Chicken (20%)20% declared20.0% estimated
- 3. Sweet Potato (19%)19% declared19.0% estimated
- 4. Dried Poultry Protein2.2% estimated
- 5. Dried Potato2.2% estimated
- 6. Protein Hydrolysate2.1% estimated
- 7. Peas2.1% estimated
- 8. Chicken Liver2.1% estimated
- 9. Dried Forest Berries2.0% estimated
- 10. 0.3% Lingonberries0.3% declared0.3% estimated
- 11. Blueberries2.0% estimated
- 12. Elderberries1.9% estimated
- 13. Dried Herbs1.9% estimated
- 14. 0.2% Stinging Nettle0.2% declared0.2% estimated
- 15. Blackberry Leaves1.8% estimated
- 16. Common Yarrow1.8% estimated
- 17. Fennel1.7% estimated
- 18. Caraway1.7% estimated
- 19. Chamomile1.6% estimated
- 20. Mistletoe Leaves1.6% estimated
- 21. Gentian Root1.5% estimated
- 22. Centaury1.5% estimated
- 23. Yeast1.4% estimated
- 24. 0.15% Mannan Oligosaccharides0.15% declared0.1% estimated
- 25. 0.05% Beta-Glucans0.05% declared0.05% estimated
- 26. Fish Oil1.4% estimated
- 27. Poultry Fat1.3% estimated
- 28. Sunflower Oil1.3% estimated
- 29. Safflower Oil1.2% estimated
- 30. Dried Chicory (source of inulin)1.2% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-13
Brand and contact: Wolf of Wilderness
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-13
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.zooplus.co.uk
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
258 reviews on this product · 4.4/5
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves an overall score of 60 out of 100 based on several key factors. The overall quality of the ingredient list positively influences the result by contributing +7.3 points. However, the processing format detracts from the total with a change of -6.7. Similarly, the carbohydrate content impacts the score by -4.3, and ingredients without printed percentages further adjust the final result by -4.1.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.34 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 24.1% | 0.096 | +2.31 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 37.0% | -0.115 | -4.26 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 10.7% | -0.092 | -0.99 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 17.3% | -0.005 | -0.09 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 3.1% | -0.012 | -0.04 |
| Other share of dry matter | 2.3% | -0.375 | -0.84 |
| Recipe graded poor | 2.1% | -0.065 | -0.14 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 2.1% | 0.060 | +0.13 |
| Undeclared quantities | 39.3% | -0.106 | -4.15 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.34 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 24.1% | 0.096 | +2.31 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 37.0% | -0.115 | -4.26 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 10.7% | -0.092 | -0.99 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 17.3% | -0.005 | -0.09 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 3.1% | -0.012 | -0.04 |
| Other share of dry matter | 2.3% | -0.375 | -0.84 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 2.1% | -0.065 | -0.14 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 2.1% | 0.060 | +0.13 |
| Undeclared quantities | 39.3% | -0.106 | -4.15 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 60.0
- Final score
- 60/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 26 | 31.7 (band 19.706707317073167 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 16.5 | 20.1 (band 6.021493902439024 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 2 | 2.4 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 95.9 |
| Calcium | 1 | 1.2 (band 0.5474085365853658 to 2.5%) | 90.7 |
| Phosphorus | 0.65 | 0.8 (band 0.4379268292682927 to 1.6%) | 88.3 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.5 | 1.5 (band 1 to 2%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 359.1 | 437.9 | 100 |
Scored over 7 declared nutrients (combined weight 90); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 17 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin A 15,000 IU
- vitamin D3 1200 IU
- vitamin E (all-rac-alpha-tocopheryl acetate) 150mg
- vitamin C 100mg
- vitamin B1 13mg
- vitamin B2 (riboflavin) 12.5mg
- vitamin B6 (pyridoxine hydrochloride) 8.5mg
- vitamin B12 160mcg
- niacin 53mg
- calcium-D-pantothenate 31mg
- biotin 690mcg
- choline chloride 2300mg
- copper (as cupric-(II)-sulphate, pentahydrate) 10mg
- zinc (as zinc oxide) 90mg
- zinc (as zinc chelate of amino acids hydrate) 45mg
- iodine (as calcium iodate anhydrous) 2mg
- selenium (as sodium selenite) 0.2mg
High confidence: full analysis plus minerals or omegas and declared energy.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (60.7% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 12.1/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "100% grain-free recipe: also suitable for dogs suffering from a grain intolerance" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
6 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sustainable premium quality: this pet food is made at a family-run business in Germany (CO2 neutral) (on page) | provenance | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Based on the natural diet of wolves living in the wild: for dogs of all breeds and sizes (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Semi-moist dry dog food with high moisture content for softer kibble pieces (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Refined with wild berries, roots and wild herbs (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Species-appropriate and natural: without added artificial preservatives, colourants or flavourings (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 100% grain-free recipe: also suitable for dogs suffering from a grain intolerance (on page) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| High-quality protein: at least 40% fresh chicken muscle meat and high-quality lamb protein (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Soft "Green Fields" - Lamb
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.