Wolf of Wilderness Adult High Valley - Beef

Wet Pate · completeHigh meatClear label

Adult High Valley - Beef
Good
our rating

Our verdict

Is Wolf of Wilderness Adult High Valley - Beef a good dog food?

We score it 82/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.

How we score

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
  • Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
  • Doesn't list chicken, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids beef: the label lists beef heart
  • You are limiting fat: 35.4% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 10.80% · Fat 8.50%

Typical analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fed
Protein10.80%
Fat8.50%
Fibre0.50%
Ash2.20%
Moisture76%

Energy: 112 kcal/100g

Additives & feeding info

Feeding and storage

Storage

Feed at room temperature. Once opened store the food in a cool place.

Feeding guide

Complete food for adult dogs. Recommended daily amounts for High Valley - Beef: 5kg 285–390g; 10kg 480–655g; 20kg 805–1100g; 30kg 1090–1490g; 40kg 1355–1850g. Actual amounts depend on age, breed, activity levels and other circumstances. Monitor weight and adjust feeding amounts as required. Provide fresh water at all times.

Additives declared on the label

Nutritional additives

Vitamin D3 200 IU; vitamin E as all rac-alpha-tocopheryl acetate 20mg; zinc as zinc sulphate, monohydrate 25mg; manganese as manganous sulphate, monohydrate 1.4mg; iodine as calcium iodate 0.75mg

Ingredients (13)0% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

  • meat 66.0%
  • other 28.8%
  • veg 4.2%
  • supplement 1.0%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
166% beef heartBeef Heartmeat · good6666.0
2meatFresh Meatmeat · medium-0.00
3liverLivermeat · good-0.00
4rumenTripemeat · medium-0.00
5lungLungmeat · medium-0.00
628.8% meat stockCooking brothother · medium28.828.8
72% blueberriesBlueberriesveg · good22.0
82% raspberriesRaspberriesveg · good22.0
91% mineralsVitamins and mineralssupplement · medium11.0
100.05% dandelion rootDandelion Rootveg · good0.050.05
110.05% nettleNettlesveg · good0.050.05
120.05% ribwortRibwortveg · good0.050.05
130.05% common yarrowYarrowveg · good0.050.05
  1. 1. 66% beef heart66% declared66.0% estimated
    Beef Heart · meat · good
  2. 2. meat0.00% estimated
    Fresh Meat · meat · medium
  3. 3. liver0.00% estimated
    Liver · meat · good
  4. 4. rumen0.00% estimated
    Tripe · meat · medium
  5. 5. lung0.00% estimated
    Lung · meat · medium
  6. 6. 28.8% meat stock28.8% declared28.8% estimated
    Cooking broth · other · medium
  7. 7. 2% blueberries2% declared2.0% estimated
    Blueberries · veg · good
  8. 8. 2% raspberries2% declared2.0% estimated
    Raspberries · veg · good
  9. 9. 1% minerals1% declared1.0% estimated
    Vitamins and minerals · supplement · medium
  10. 10. 0.05% dandelion root0.05% declared0.05% estimated
    Dandelion Root · veg · good
  11. 11. 0.05% nettle0.05% declared0.05% estimated
    Nettles · veg · good
  12. 12. 0.05% ribwort0.05% declared0.05% estimated
    Ribwort · veg · good
  13. 13. 0.05% common yarrow0.05% declared0.05% estimated
    Yarrow · veg · good

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-15

Brand and contact: Wolf of Wilderness

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-15
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)
Product page
www.zooplus.co.uk

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.

34 reviews on this product · 4.2/5

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Why this score?

The product scored 82 out of 100. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +8.6 points, while the meat content added +8.3 points. The remaining ingredients reduced the score by -2.5, and being labelled nutritionally complete added +2.3 points.

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.99.191+8.62
Meat share of dry matter86.1%0.096+8.26
Vegetable share of dry matter2.9%-0.005-0.02
Supplement share of dry matter4.3%-0.012-0.05
Other share of dry matter6.7%-0.375-2.51
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes0.707+0.71
Processing multiplier1.0033.786+33.79
Processing: Wet Pateyes-0.672-0.67
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.99.191+8.62
Meat share of dry matter86.1%0.096+8.26
Carb share of dry matter0.0%-0.115+0.00
Oil share of dry matter0.0%-0.092+0.00
Vegetable share of dry matter2.9%-0.005-0.02
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.163+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter4.3%-0.012-0.05
Other share of dry matter6.7%-0.375-2.51
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.027+0.00
Recipe graded poor0.0%-0.065+0.00
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.179+0.00
Number of poor ingredients0-0.876+0.00
Largest single poor ingredient0.0%0.060+0.00
Undeclared quantities0.0%-0.106+0.00
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes0.707+0.71
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)no-3.158+0.00
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty0.000.222+0.00
Processing multiplier1.0033.786+33.79
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateyes-0.672-0.67
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
-0.08
Additives declared on label
+1 transparency bonus
Subtotal
82.3
Final score
82/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v382/100current
v285/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein10.845 (band 21 to 40%)100
Fat8.535.4 (band 6.416666666666667 to 20%)100
Fibre0.52.1 (band 0.5 to 5%)91.1
Energy (kcal/100g)112466.7100

Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.

Declared fortification: 5 nutritional additives on the label
  • Vitamin D3 200 IU
  • vitamin E as all rac-alpha-tocopheryl acetate 20mg
  • zinc as zinc sulphate, monohydrate 25mg
  • manganese as manganous sulphate, monohydrate 1.4mg
  • iodine as calcium iodate 0.75mg

Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (100% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)20/20
✓ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory)15/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)5/10
✓ Energy value declared (voluntary)5/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✓ Feeding guidance given (mandatory)10/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

50/100 · limited — 2 checkable claims: 1 consistent, 1 contradicted.

Contradicted by the label

  • "Mono protein" — the declared label says otherwise on single protein.

Consistent with the label

  • "100 % grain-free recipe" — supported by the declared grain-free data.

6 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.

Limited: at least one claim contradicts the declared label, or a recent upheld ASA ruling applies.

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
Suitable for dogs with grain allergies (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion source
No artificial preservatives, colours or aromas (on page)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion source
High meat content, min. 66% (on page)High/low levelnot checkableManufacturer assertion source
Mono protein (on page)ContentcontradictedManufacturer assertion source
100 % grain-free recipe (on page)Free-fromconsistentManufacturer assertion source
with 1 source of animal protein (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion source
at least 66% pure meat (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion source
Premium grain-free wet dog food inspired by the wolf's natural diet (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion source

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Alternatives to Adult High Valley - Beef

Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.

See all alternatives

See all products from Wolf of Wilderness

Community0 comments

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.