Our verdict
Is Dibo Rind PUR a good dog food?
We score it 60/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete wet food in chunks for dogs of all life stages, with beef heart, beef and beef liver as the main ingredients.
70% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Single named protein: beef
- Doesn't list chicken, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- You are limiting fat: 28.0% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 12% · Fat 7%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 12% |
| Fat | 7% |
| Fibre | 0.40% |
| Ash | 2% |
| Moisture | 75% |
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Bitte bewahren Sie unsere DIBO Nassfutterdosen an einem kühlen Ort auf, an dem sie vor direkter Sonneneinstrahlung geschützt sind.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin D3 200 I.E./kg; Vitamin E all rac-alfa-Tocopherolacetat 30 I.E./kg; Zink als Zinksulfat; Monohydrat 15 mg/kg; Mangan als Mangan-II-sulfat; Monohydrat 3 mg/kg; Jod als Calcium-jodat; wasserfrei 0; 75 mg/kg
Ingredients (8)70% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 70.0%
- other 28.8%
- supplement 1.0%
- oil 0.2%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 70% beef heart | Beef Heart | meat · good | 70 | 70.0 |
| 2 | beef | Beef | meat · medium | - | 0.0 |
| 3 | beef liver | Beef Liver | meat · good | - | 0.0 |
| 4 | beef lung | Beef lung | meat · medium | - | 0.0 |
| 5 | beef tripe | Beef Tripe | meat · medium | - | 0.0 |
| 6 | 28.8% broth | Cooking broth | other · medium | 28.8 | 28.8 |
| 7 | 1% minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | 1 | 1.0 |
| 8 | 0.2% safflower oil | Safflower Oil | oil · good | 0.2 | 0.2 |
- 1. 70% beef heart70% declared70.0% estimated
- 2. beef0.0% estimated
- 3. beef liver0.0% estimated
- 4. beef lung0.0% estimated
- 5. beef tripe0.0% estimated
- 6. 28.8% broth28.8% declared28.8% estimated
- 7. 1% minerals1% declared1.0% estimated
- 8. 0.2% safflower oil0.2% declared0.2% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-08-22
Brand and contact: Dibo
- Website
- https://www.dibo.de/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-08-22
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.dibo.de
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The overall score is 60 out of 100. Ingredients without printed percentages dragged the score down by -7.4. The overall quality of the ingredient list added +6 points, while the remaining ingredients cost -2.4. Being labelled nutritionally complete contributed a further +2.3 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.7 | 9.191 | +6.02 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.9% | -0.092 | -0.08 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 4.2% | -0.012 | -0.05 |
| Other share of dry matter | 6.5% | -0.375 | -2.44 |
| Undeclared quantities | 70.0% | -0.106 | -7.39 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.7 | 9.191 | +6.02 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.115 | +0.00 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.9% | -0.092 | -0.08 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.005 | +0.00 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 4.2% | -0.012 | -0.05 |
| Other share of dry matter | 6.5% | -0.375 | -2.44 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 70.0% | -0.106 | -7.39 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 60.1
- Final score
- 60/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 12 | 48 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 7 | 28 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 0.4 | 1.6 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 84.7 |
Scored over 3 declared nutrients (combined weight 50); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 9 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin D3 200 I.E./kg
- Vitamin E all rac-alfa-Tocopherolacetat 30 I.E./kg
- Zink als Zinksulfat
- Monohydrat 15 mg/kg
- Mangan als Mangan-II-sulfat
- Monohydrat 3 mg/kg
- Jod als Calcium-jodat
- wasserfrei 0
- 75 mg/kg
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (30% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 6/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "Rindfleisch ist reich an Proteinen" — supported by the declared high protein data.
15 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| fördert durch den höheren Wassergehalt die Verdauung (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| unterstützt einen trägen Darm (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| beugt einer Verstopfung ihres Vierbeiners vor (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Rindfleisch ist reich an Proteinen und essentiellen Aminosäuren, die zur Aufrechterhaltung einer optimalen Gesundheit beitragen (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| wichtige Vitamine wie Vitamin B12, das für eine gesunde Nervenfunktion von Bedeutung ist (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Vitamin A, das die Gesundheit von Haut und Augen unterstützt (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| gesunde und ausgewogene Ernährung (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| ohne Konservierungsmittel (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Rindfleisch ist reich an Proteinen (on page) | High/low level | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| hochwertigem Rindfleisch als Hauptzutat (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| das Beste vom Rind (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| mit wertvollen Vitaminen und Nährstoffen (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| gute Alternative zum BARF Futter (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| schlachtfrische Zutaten (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| nur ausgewähltes Fleisch und Innereien vom Rind in höchster Qualität (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Rindfleisch ist reich an essentiellen Aminosäuren (on page) | High/low level | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Rind PUR
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.