Webstersdogfood Performance - High Energy Grain Free Beef
Dry Extruded · completeHigh meatClear label

Our verdict
Is Webstersdogfood Performance - High Energy Grain Free Beef a good dog food?
We score it 65/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete extruded dry food for adult dogs, with beef, sweet potatoes and beef fat as the main ingredients.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
55% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list chicken, turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids beef: the label lists beef
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists green-lipped mussel
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
- You are limiting fat: 20.0% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 33% · Fat 20%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 33% |
| Fat | 20% |
| Fibre | 3% |
| Ash | 9% |
| Carbohydrates | 23.30% |
| Calcium | 1.80% |
| Phosphorus | 0.90% |
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
Adult Dog 5-15kg: 90-155g, 15-20kg: 155-260g, 20-30kg: 260-355g, 30-40kg: 355-440g, 40kg-60kg: 440-595g, 60+kg: 595g+
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A 19000 IU; Vitamin D3 1900 IU; Vitamin E 110mg; Iron (Ferrous Sulphate Monohydrate): 40mg; Copper (Cupric Sulphate Pentahydrate): 7mg; Manganese (Manganous Sulphate Monohydrate): 30mg; Zinc (Zinc Sulphate Monohydrate): 100mg; Iodine (Calcium Iodate Anhydrous): 1mg; Selenium (Sodium Selenite): 0.25mg
Technological additives
Antioxidants (Natural Mixed Tocopherols)
Ingredients (24)55% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 45.0%
- veg 24.4%
- supplement 13.4%
- carb 9.2%
- oil 3.2%
- fibre 3.0%
- additive 1.8%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Beef Meal (25%) | Beef | meat · medium | 25 | 25.0 |
| 2 | Beef (20%) | Beef | meat · medium | 20 | 20.0 |
| 3 | Sweet Potato | Sweet Potatoes | carb · good | - | 3.3 |
| 4 | Beef Fat | Beef Fat | oil · medium | - | 3.2 |
| 5 | Peas | Peas | veg · good | - | 3.1 |
| 6 | Potato | Potatoes | carb · medium | - | 3.1 |
| 7 | Beet Pulp | Beet Pulp | fibre · medium | - | 3.0 |
| 8 | Linseed | Linseed | veg · good | - | 2.9 |
| 9 | Buckwheat | Buckwheat | carb · medium | - | 2.8 |
| 10 | Brewers Yeast | Brewer's Yeast | supplement · good | - | 2.8 |
| 11 | Minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 2.7 |
| 12 | Dried Apple | Apples | veg · good | - | 2.6 |
| 13 | Dried Nettle | Nettles | veg · good | - | 2.5 |
| 14 | Dried Cranberry | Cranberries | veg · good | - | 2.5 |
| 15 | Dried Courgette | Courgette | veg · good | - | 2.4 |
| 16 | Dried Fennel | Fennel | veg · good | - | 2.3 |
| 17 | Dried Dandelion | Dandelion Root | veg · good | - | 2.2 |
| 18 | Green Lipped Mussel | Green-Lipped Mussel | supplement · good | - | 2.2 |
| 19 | Dried Blueberry | Blueberries | veg · good | - | 2.1 |
| 20 | Prebiotic MOS | Mannanoligosaccharides | supplement · good | - | 2.0 |
| 21 | Prebiotic FOS | Prebiotics | supplement · good | - | 1.9 |
| 22 | Yucca Extract | Yucca Schidigera | supplement · good | - | 1.9 |
| 23 | Citrus Extract | Citric Acid | additive · medium | - | 1.8 |
| 24 | Rosemary Extract | Rosemary | veg · good | - | 1.7 |
- 1. Beef Meal (25%)25% declared25.0% estimated
- 2. Beef (20%)20% declared20.0% estimated
- 3. Sweet Potato3.3% estimated
- 4. Beef Fat3.2% estimated
- 5. Peas3.1% estimated
- 6. Potato3.1% estimated
- 7. Beet Pulp3.0% estimated
- 8. Linseed2.9% estimated
- 9. Buckwheat2.8% estimated
- 10. Brewers Yeast2.8% estimated
- 11. Minerals2.7% estimated
- 12. Dried Apple2.6% estimated
- 13. Dried Nettle2.5% estimated
- 14. Dried Cranberry2.5% estimated
- 15. Dried Courgette2.4% estimated
- 16. Dried Fennel2.3% estimated
- 17. Dried Dandelion2.2% estimated
- 18. Green Lipped Mussel2.2% estimated
- 19. Dried Blueberry2.1% estimated
- 20. Prebiotic MOS2.0% estimated
- 21. Prebiotic FOS1.9% estimated
- 22. Yucca Extract1.9% estimated
- 23. Citrus Extract1.8% estimated
- 24. Rosemary Extract1.7% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-03
Brand and contact: Webstersdogfood
- [email protected]
- Phone
- 07854 059738
- Address
- Morton Lincolnshire PE10 0NP
- Contact page
- www.webstersdogfood.co.uk
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-03
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.webstersdogfood.co.uk
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves an overall score of 65 out of 100 based on several key factors. The meat content contributed +3.9 points, while the overall quality of the ingredient list added +6.5 points. However, the processing format reduced the score by -6.7 points, and ingredients without printed percentages resulted in a deduction of -5.8 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.7 | 9.191 | +6.51 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 40.4% | 0.096 | +3.88 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 5.8% | -0.115 | -0.66 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 4.5% | -0.092 | -0.41 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 25.9% | -0.005 | -0.13 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 2.3% | 0.163 | +0.37 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 17.4% | -0.012 | -0.21 |
| Undeclared quantities | 55.0% | -0.106 | -5.81 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Additive penalty | -2.15 | 0.222 | -0.48 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.7 | 9.191 | +6.51 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 40.4% | 0.096 | +3.88 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 5.8% | -0.115 | -0.66 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 4.5% | -0.092 | -0.41 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 25.9% | -0.005 | -0.13 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 2.3% | 0.163 | +0.37 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 17.4% | -0.012 | -0.21 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 55.0% | -0.106 | -5.81 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -2.15 | 0.222 | -0.48 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 65.4
- Final score
- 65/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 33 | 36.5 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 20 | 22.1 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 3 | 3.3 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Calcium | 1.8 | 2 (band 0.5 to 2.5%) | 100 |
| Phosphorus | 0.9 | 1 (band 0.4 to 1.6%) | 99.7 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 2 | 2 (band 1 to 2%) | 100 |
Scored over 6 declared nutrients (combined weight 80); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.
Declared fortification: 9 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin A 19000 IU
- Vitamin D3 1900 IU
- Vitamin E 110mg
- Iron (Ferrous Sulphate Monohydrate): 40mg
- Copper (Cupric Sulphate Pentahydrate): 7mg
- Manganese (Manganous Sulphate Monohydrate): 30mg
- Zinc (Zinc Sulphate Monohydrate): 100mg
- Iodine (Calcium Iodate Anhydrous): 1mg
- Selenium (Sodium Selenite): 0.25mg
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (45% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 9/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
50/100 · limited — 2 checkable claims: 1 consistent, 1 contradicted.
Contradicted by the label
- "single source protein of Beef" — the declared label says otherwise on single protein.
Consistent with the label
- "grain free" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
7 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Limited: at least one claim contradicts the declared label, or a recent upheld ASA ruling applies.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 45% TOTAL BEEF A responsibly sourced and highly digestible protein source (on page) | provenance | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| great for sensitive tummies (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| added Green Lipped Mussel to help maintain those hard working joints! (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| contains a prebiotic which will help to keep the gut healthy (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Contains Green Lipped Mussel to help with joint health (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Contains prebiotic Mannan – Oligosaccharide to help maintain a healthy gut (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| single source protein of Beef (on page) | Content | contradicted | Manufacturer assertion |
| no added artificial colours, flavourings or preservatives! (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| grain free (on page) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Performance - High Energy Grain Free Beef
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.




