Our verdict
Is Tuggs Pork Power a good dog food?
We score it 89/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete frozen fresh food for dogs of all life stages, with pork, meat trimming and pork liver as the main ingredients.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, venison, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists salmon oil
- Your dog avoids pork: the label lists pork
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
- You are limiting fat: 36.2% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 12.50% · Fat 10.60%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 12.50% |
| Fat | 10.60% |
| Fibre | 1.30% |
| Ash | 1% |
| Moisture | 70.70% |
Energy: 144 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
Recommended daily amounts for an average adult dog: 1–5kg: 80–180g; 6–10kg: 180–250g; 11–18kg: 330–420g; 19–27kg: 500–660g; 28–40kg: 660–840g; 40kg+: 840–980g. Active or working dogs may need more, less-active dogs less. Same guidelines apply across every recipe.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A 2500 IU/kg; Vitamin D3 250 IU/kg; Vitamin E 20 mg/kg; Zinc (3b607) 20 mg/kg; Iron (3b108) 19 mg/kg; Manganese (3b502) 3 mg/kg; Copper (3b413) 2.5 mg/kg; Iodine (3b201) 0.6 mg/kg; Selenium 0.04 mg/kg
Ingredients (14)14 of 14 percentages printed
Estimated composition
- meat 62.5%
- veg 17.8%
- carb 16.0%
- supplement 2.0%
- oil 1.8%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Heart 20% | Pork (heart) | meat · good | 20 | 20.0 |
| 2 | Trimming 15% | Meat Trimming | meat · medium | 15 | 15.0 |
| 3 | Liver 7.5% | Pork Liver | meat · good | 7.5 | 7.5 |
| 4 | Fresh Insect (20%) | Insects | meat · good | 20 | 20.0 |
| 5 | Sweet Potato (12%) | Sweet Potatoes | carb · good | 12 | 12.0 |
| 6 | Carrot (8.75%) | Carrots | veg · good | 8.75 | 8.8 |
| 7 | Broccoli (8%) | Broccoli | veg · good | 8 | 8.0 |
| 8 | Quinoa (4%) | Quinoa | carb · good | 4 | 4.0 |
| 9 | Sunflower Oil (1.5%) | Sunflower oil | oil · good | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| 10 | Minerals (1%) | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | 1 | 1.0 |
| 11 | Brewer’s Yeast (1%) | Yeast | supplement · good | 1 | 1.0 |
| 12 | Salmon Oil (0.25%) | Salmon Oil | oil · good | 0.25 | 0.3 |
| 13 | Kelp Powder (0.5%) | Kelp | veg · good | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| 14 | Chia Seeds (0.5%) | Chia Seeds | veg · good | 0.5 | 0.5 |
- 1. Heart 20%20% declared20.0% estimated
- 2. Trimming 15%15% declared15.0% estimated
- 3. Liver 7.5%7.5% declared7.5% estimated
- 4. Fresh Insect (20%)20% declared20.0% estimated
- 5. Sweet Potato (12%)12% declared12.0% estimated
- 6. Carrot (8.75%)8.75% declared8.8% estimated
- 7. Broccoli (8%)8% declared8.0% estimated
- 8. Quinoa (4%)4% declared4.0% estimated
- 9. Sunflower Oil (1.5%)1.5% declared1.5% estimated
- 10. Minerals (1%)1% declared1.0% estimated
- 11. Brewer’s Yeast (1%)1% declared1.0% estimated
- 12. Salmon Oil (0.25%)0.25% declared0.3% estimated
- 13. Kelp Powder (0.5%)0.5% declared0.5% estimated
- 14. Chia Seeds (0.5%)0.5% declared0.5% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-15
Brand and contact: Tuggs
- Website
- https://www.tuggs.uk/
- Contact page
- tuggs.co.uk
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-15
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.tuggs.uk
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 4.7/5 · 617 reviews
93 reviews on this product · 4.7/5
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The score on our scale comes to 89 out of 100. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +8 points, and the meat content contributed +5.4 points to lift the rating. The carbohydrate content deducted -2.4 points, while the processing format deducted -2.4 points, pulling the final tally back down.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.9 | 9.191 | +8.04 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 56.4% | 0.096 | +5.42 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 21.0% | -0.115 | -2.42 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 5.6% | -0.092 | -0.51 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 11.0% | -0.005 | -0.06 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 5.9% | -0.012 | -0.07 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Fresh × high meat | 1.0 | 11.084 | +11.08 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.10 | 33.786 | +37.16 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | yes | -2.354 | -2.35 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.9 | 9.191 | +8.04 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 56.4% | 0.096 | +5.42 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 21.0% | -0.115 | -2.42 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 5.6% | -0.092 | -0.51 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 11.0% | -0.005 | -0.06 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 5.9% | -0.012 | -0.07 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 0.0% | -0.106 | +0.00 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 1.0 | 11.084 | +11.08 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.10 | 33.786 | +37.16 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | yes | -2.354 | -2.35 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -1.74
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 89.5
- Final score
- 89/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 12.5 | 42.7 (band 22.1160409556314 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 10.6 | 36.2 (band 6.757679180887372 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 1.3 | 4.4 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 144 | 491.5 | 100 |
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 9 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin A 2500 IU/kg
- Vitamin D3 250 IU/kg
- Vitamin E 20 mg/kg
- Zinc (3b607) 20 mg/kg
- Iron (3b108) 19 mg/kg
- Manganese (3b502) 3 mg/kg
- Copper (3b413) 2.5 mg/kg
- Iodine (3b201) 0.6 mg/kg
- Selenium 0.04 mg/kg
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (100% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 20/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "high in protein" — supported by the declared high protein data.
9 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supports Active Lifestyles (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Great for sensitive pups (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Antioxidants for general health and wellbeing (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Human-grade ingredients (on page) | provenance | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Healthy fats provide essential nutrients for muscle repair (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Rich in B vitamins to boost metabolism (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| complete and balanced as per FEDIAF guidelines for dogs of all life-stages (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| high in protein (on page) | High/low level | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| free from grains, legumes, and any type of filler or artificial preservative (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| free from legumes and any type of cheap filler or artificial preservative (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Pork Power
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.