Specific Adult Large & Giant Breed

Dry Extruded · complete

Poor
our rating

Our verdict

Is Specific Adult Large & Giant Breed a good dog food?

We score it 43/100 (Poor). The main reasons are set out in "Why you might not" below, and every step of the calculation is shown under "How we calculated this score".

Complete extruded dry food for adult dogs, with wheat, maize gluten and fish meal as the main ingredients.

How we score

Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.

93% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

Why you might choose it

  • Declares energy content, which most labels omit.
  • Nutritionally complete: formulated to be fed as the whole diet.

Why you might not

  • 2 poor-graded ingredients make up about 23% of the recipe.
  • 93% of the recipe mass has no printed percentage, so the exact split cannot be verified.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
  • Labelling or feeding guide is aimed at giant dogs
  • Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, venison, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids fish: the label lists fish meal
  • Your dog avoids pork: the label lists pork fat
  • Your dog avoids grain: the label lists wheat
  • You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 23.60% · Fat 10.90%

Typical analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fed
Protein23.60%
Fat10.90%
Fibre2.90%
Moisture9.30%
Carbohydrates47.80%
Omega-3 fatty acids0.64%
Calcium0.70%
Phosphorus0.62%
Sodium0.21%

Energy: 361 kcal/100g

Additives & feeding info

Feeding and storage

Feeding guide

Feeding guide in grams per day. Adult weight 20-95 kg, thin/normal/overweight ranges from 210-1015 g/day depending on weight and condition. Adjust for breed, environment, season and activity level.

Additives declared on the label

Nutritional additives

vitamin D3 1044 IU; copper 10.1 mg (copper chelate of glycine hydrate); iron 108 mg (ferrous sulphate monohydrate); zinc 129 mg (zinc chelate of glycine hydrate); manganese 7.4 mg (manganese chelate of glycine hydrate); iodine 2.5 mg (calcium iodate anhydrous); taurine 0.5 g; L-carnitine 300 mg

Technological additives

natural antioxidants

Ingredients (11)93% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

  • carb 33.0%
  • meat 27.0%
  • oil 18.6%
  • fibre 13.6%
  • supplement 7.8%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
1WheatWheatcarb · poor-12.0
2maize proteinMaize glutencarb · poor-11.4
3fish mealFish Mealmeat · medium-10.8
4beet pulp (7%)Beet Pulpfibre · medium77.0
5pork fatPork Fatoil · medium-10.2
6maizeMaize / Corncarb · medium-9.6
7animal protein hydrolysateHydrolysed Animal Proteinmeat · medium-9.0
8fish oilFish Oiloil · good-8.4
9mineralsVitamins and mineralssupplement · medium-7.8
10egg powderDried Whole Eggmeat · good-7.2
11psyllium huskPsyllium fibrefibre · good-6.6
  1. 1. Wheat12.0% estimated
    Wheat · carb · poor
  2. 2. maize protein11.4% estimated
    Maize gluten · carb · poor
  3. 3. fish meal10.8% estimated
    Fish Meal · meat · medium
  4. 4. beet pulp (7%)7% declared7.0% estimated
    Beet Pulp · fibre · medium
  5. 5. pork fat10.2% estimated
    Pork Fat · oil · medium
  6. 6. maize9.6% estimated
    Maize / Corn · carb · medium
  7. 7. animal protein hydrolysate9.0% estimated
    Hydrolysed Animal Protein · meat · medium
  8. 8. fish oil8.4% estimated
    Fish Oil · oil · good
  9. 9. minerals7.8% estimated
    Vitamins and minerals · supplement · medium
  10. 10. egg powder7.2% estimated
    Dried Whole Egg · meat · good
  11. 11. psyllium husk6.6% estimated
    Psyllium fibre · fibre · good

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-14

Brand and contact: Specific

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-14
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Why this score?

This recipe achieves an overall rating of 43 out of 100 based on several key factors. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +2.3 points to the total. However, the presence of ingredients without printed percentages reduced the score by -9.8. Furthermore, the processing format decreased the score by -6.7, and the carbohydrate content lowered the final result by -3.6.

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.29.191+2.29
Carb share of dry matter31.7%-0.115-3.64
Oil share of dry matter20.1%-0.092-1.85
Supplement share of dry matter7.8%-0.012-0.10
Recipe graded poor23.4%-0.065-1.52
Number of poor ingredients2-0.876-1.75
Largest single poor ingredient12.0%0.060+0.72
Undeclared quantities93.0%-0.106-9.82
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.29.191+2.29
Meat share of dry matter0.0%0.096+0.00
Carb share of dry matter31.7%-0.115-3.64
Oil share of dry matter20.1%-0.092-1.85
Vegetable share of dry matter0.0%-0.005+0.00
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.163+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter7.8%-0.012-0.10
Other share of dry matter0.0%-0.375+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.027+0.00
Recipe graded poor23.4%-0.065-1.52
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.179+0.00
Number of poor ingredients2-0.876-1.75
Largest single poor ingredient12.0%0.060+0.72
Undeclared quantities93.0%-0.106-9.82
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)no0.707+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty0.000.222+0.00
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
+0.02
Additives declared on label
+2 transparency bonus
Subtotal
42.8
Final score
43/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v343/100current
v240/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein23.626 (band 18 to 40%)91.9
Fat10.912 (band 5.5 to 20%)97
Fibre2.93.2 (band 0.5 to 5%)100
Calcium0.70.8 (band 0.5 to 2.5%)78.2
Phosphorus0.620.7 (band 0.4 to 1.6%)84.2
Sodium0.210.2 (band 0.1+%)100
Calcium:phosphorus ratio1.11.1 (band 1 to 2%)77.7
Energy (kcal/100g)361398100

Scored over 8 declared nutrients (combined weight 95); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.

Declared fortification: 8 nutritional additives on the label
  • vitamin D3 1044 IU
  • copper 10.1 mg (copper chelate of glycine hydrate)
  • iron 108 mg (ferrous sulphate monohydrate)
  • zinc 129 mg (zinc chelate of glycine hydrate)
  • manganese 7.4 mg (manganese chelate of glycine hydrate)
  • iodine 2.5 mg (calcium iodate anhydrous)
  • taurine 0.5 g
  • L-carnitine 300 mg

Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (7% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)1.4/20
✗ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file0/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)10/10
✓ Energy value declared (voluntary)5/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✓ Feeding guidance given (mandatory)10/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.

Consistent with the label

  • "complete and nutritionally balanced food for adult dogs over 25 kg" — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.

8 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.

Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
High fibre levels and exceptionally digestible ingredients to help firm up the softer stools common amongst large and giant breeds (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
extra-large kibble to encourage chewing (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
high levels of Omega-3 from fish for healthy coat, skin and joints (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
moderate energy density and added L Carnitine – a fat burning amino acid that helps convert fat to energy (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Beet pulp as a source of fermentable fibres to support beneficial microflora and intestinal health (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
With added psyllium husk to absorb water so firming up stools and regulating the digestive tract (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
highly digestible ingredients to reduce faecal output (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
complete and nutritionally balanced food for adult dogs over 25 kg (on page)ContentconsistentManufacturer assertion
Contains no added artificial colours or flavourings (on page)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Alternatives to Adult Large & Giant Breed

Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.

See all alternatives

See all products from Specific

Community0 comments

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.