Ruff's Recipes Hunters Stew with Duck, Venison and Spinach Adult Wet
Wet Pate · completeHigh meatClear label
Our verdict
Is Ruff's Recipes Hunters Stew with Duck, Venison and Spinach Adult Wet a good dog food?
We score it 76/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete wet paté food for adult dogs, with duck, turkey and pork as the main ingredients.
36% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, lamb, fish as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists turkey
- Your dog avoids venison: the label lists venison
- Your dog avoids pork: the label lists pork
- Your dog avoids duck: the label lists duck
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
- You are limiting fat: 27.8% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 9% · Fat 5%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 9% |
| Fat | 5% |
| Fibre | 1% |
| Ash | 2.50% |
| Moisture | 82% |
| Omega-3 fatty acids | 0.20% |
| Omega-6 fatty acids | 1.50% |
| Calcium | 0.40% |
| Phosphorus | 0.30% |
Energy: 84 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Always store in a cool dry place. Once opened, keep refridgerated and use within 2 days.
Feeding guide
Up to 5kg: 1-3 Trays; 3-5kg: 3-5 1/2 Trays; 5-12kg: 3-5 1/2 Trays; 12-25kg: 5 1/2-10 Trays; 25-45kg: 10-15 Trays daily
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Zinc (Zinc chelate of amino acids hydrate) 15.3mg; Manganese (Manganese chelate of amino acids hydrate) 3.2mg; Iodine (Calcium iodate, anhydrous) 0.5mg; Copper (Copper (II) Sulphate Pentahydrate) 2.4mg
Technological additives
None Stated
Ingredients (25)36% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 71.1%
- veg 24.6%
- supplement 4.3%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Duck | Duck | meat · medium | - | 5.7 |
| 2 | Turkey | Turkey | meat · medium | - | 5.4 |
| 3 | Duck 21% | Duck | meat · medium | 21 | 21.0 |
| 4 | Turkey 20% | Turkey | meat · medium | 20 | 20.0 |
| 5 | Pork 14% | Pork | meat · medium | 14 | 14.0 |
| 6 | Venison 5% | Venison | meat · good | 5 | 5.0 |
| 7 | Peas (4%) | Peas | veg · good | 4 | 4.0 |
| 8 | Dried Spinach | Spinach | veg · good | - | 5.0 |
| 9 | equivalent to 4% Spinach | Spinach | veg · good | - | 4.6 |
| 10 | Minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 4.3 |
| 11 | Linseed | Linseed | veg · good | - | 3.9 |
| 12 | 0.02% Seaweed | Seaweed | veg · good | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| 13 | 0.02% Nettle | Nettles | veg · good | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| 14 | 0.02% Rosemary | Rosemary | veg · good | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| 15 | 0.02% Bay | Bay Leaf | veg · medium | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| 16 | 0.02% Dill | Dill | veg · good | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| 17 | 0.02% Mint | Mint | veg · good | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| 18 | 0.02% Oregano | Oregano | veg · good | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| 19 | 0.02% Thyme | Thyme | veg · good | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| 20 | 0.02% Chamomile | Chamomile | veg · good | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| 21 | 0.02% Turmeric | Turmeric | veg · good | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| 22 | 0.02% Reishi Mushroom | Reishi Mushroom | supplement · good | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| 23 | 0.02% Valerian Root | Valerian Root | veg · medium | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| 24 | Chicory (a source of Inulin) | Chicory | veg · good | - | 3.6 |
| 25 | Dried Blueberry. | Blueberries | veg · good | - | 3.2 |
- 1. Duck5.7% estimated
- 2. Turkey5.4% estimated
- 3. Duck 21%21% declared21.0% estimated
- 4. Turkey 20%20% declared20.0% estimated
- 5. Pork 14%14% declared14.0% estimated
- 6. Venison 5%5% declared5.0% estimated
- 7. Peas (4%)4% declared4.0% estimated
- 8. Dried Spinach5.0% estimated
- 9. equivalent to 4% Spinach4.6% estimated
- 10. Minerals4.3% estimated
- 11. Linseed3.9% estimated
- 12. 0.02% Seaweed0.02% declared0.02% estimated
- 13. 0.02% Nettle0.02% declared0.02% estimated
- 14. 0.02% Rosemary0.02% declared0.02% estimated
- 15. 0.02% Bay0.02% declared0.02% estimated
- 16. 0.02% Dill0.02% declared0.02% estimated
- 17. 0.02% Mint0.02% declared0.02% estimated
- 18. 0.02% Oregano0.02% declared0.02% estimated
- 19. 0.02% Thyme0.02% declared0.02% estimated
- 20. 0.02% Chamomile0.02% declared0.02% estimated
- 21. 0.02% Turmeric0.02% declared0.02% estimated
- 22. 0.02% Reishi Mushroom0.02% declared0.02% estimated
- 23. 0.02% Valerian Root0.02% declared0.02% estimated
- 24. Chicory (a source of Inulin)3.6% estimated
- 25. Dried Blueberry.3.2% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-13
Brand and contact: Ruff's Recipes
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-13
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.petsathome.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
28 reviews on this product · 4.8/5
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The overall score is 76 out of 100. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +6.4 points, and the meat content contributed +4.4 points. Ingredients without printed percentages reduced the score by -3.8, while being labelled nutritionally complete added +2.3 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.7 | 9.191 | +6.38 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 45.8% | 0.096 | +4.39 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 35.0% | -0.005 | -0.18 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 10.8% | -0.012 | -0.13 |
| Undeclared quantities | 35.8% | -0.106 | -3.78 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.7 | 9.191 | +6.38 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 45.8% | 0.096 | +4.39 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.115 | +0.00 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.092 | +0.00 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 35.0% | -0.005 | -0.18 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 10.8% | -0.012 | -0.13 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 35.8% | -0.106 | -3.78 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 75.6
- Final score
- 76/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 9 | 50 (band 20.999999999999996 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 5 | 27.8 (band 6.416666666666666 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 1 | 5.6 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Calcium | 0.4 | 2.2 (band 0.5833333333333333 to 2.5%) | 100 |
| Phosphorus | 0.3 | 1.7 (band 0.4666666666666666 to 1.6%) | 95.8 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.3 | 1.3 (band 1 to 2%) | 90 |
| Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3) | - | - | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 84 | 466.7 | 100 |
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.
Scored over 8 declared nutrients (combined weight 100); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 4 nutritional additives on the label
- Zinc (Zinc chelate of amino acids hydrate) 15.3mg
- Manganese (Manganese chelate of amino acids hydrate) 3.2mg
- Iodine (Calcium iodate, anhydrous) 0.5mg
- Copper (Copper (II) Sulphate Pentahydrate) 2.4mg
High confidence: full analysis plus minerals or omegas and declared energy.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (64.2% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 12.8/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "Grain free" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
6 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| High meat content (on page) | High/low level | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Added vitamins & minerals (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Skin & coat care (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Gut health support (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Grain free - hypoallergenic (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Grain free (on page) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Includes omega-6 (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Hunters Stew with Duck, Venison and Spinach Adult Wet
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.