Celtic Connection Met Eend & Gans – Natvoer

Wet Pate complete Clear label

Met Eend & Gans – Natvoer
Average
our rating

Is Celtic Connection Met Eend & Gans – Natvoer a good dog food?

We score it 68/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.

How we score

Why this score?

The overall score is 68 out of 100. Printing percentages on the label contributed +3.2 points, and the processing format added +2.9. Ingredients we could not classify reduced the score by -1.9, while being labelled nutritionally complete contributed +1.7.

The Recipe score measures how attractive and transparent the declared ingredient list is. It is not, by itself, proof that the food is nutritionally appropriate for long-term feeding. The Nutritional and Evidence scores measure what we can verify towards that stronger claim.

Complete wet paté food for adult dogs, with duck, turkey and goose as the main ingredients.

Why you might choose it

  • Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
  • Doesn't list grain ingredients.
  • High in protein: 51% protein on a dry-matter basis.

Why you might not

  • Around 85% of the recipe is generic or unspecified ingredients.
  • High in fat: 25% fat on a dry-matter basis.
  • Meat makes up an estimated 9% of the dry matter (11% as fed); carbohydrates dominate.

View the source page

Estimated composition

unknown58.8%
other29.5%
meat10.8%
supplement0.9%

Typical analysis (as fed)

Protein
10.10%
Fat
5%
Fibre
0.40%
Ash
2.50%
Moisture
80%

Energy: 114 kcal/100g

Additives & feeding info

Nutritional additives

Vitamine D3 200 IE; Zink (zinkchelaat van glycinehydraat) 25 mg; Mangaan (mangaanchelaat van glycinehydraat) 1,4 mg; Koper (koper(II)chelaat van glycinehydraat) 1 mg; Jodium (calciumjodaat, watervrij) 0,75 mg

Storage

Na openen gekoeld bewaren en binnen 24 uur gebruiken.

Feeding guide

Verdeel de voeding over ten minste twee maaltijden. Op kamertemperatuur serveren. Zorg altijd voor vers drinkwater.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
  • Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
  • Doesn't list chicken, beef, lamb, fish, venison, pork as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists turkey
  • Your dog avoids duck: the label lists duck
  • You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
  • You are limiting fat: 25.0% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.

Ingredients (15)

#As declaredMatchedCategoryTierDeclared %Est. %
1DuckDuckmeatmedium-0.8
245% turkeyTurkeymeatmedium4545.0
310% duckDuckmeatmedium1010.0
410% gooseGoosemeatgood1010.0
529.48% stockCooking brothothermedium29.4829.5
6sweet potatoSweet Potatoescarbgood-0.8
7pumpkinPumpkinveggood-0.7
8mineralsVitamins and mineralssupplementmedium-0.7
9cranberriesCranberriesveggood-0.6
10artichokeArtichokeveggood-0.6
11mintMintveggood-0.5
12Schizochytrium microalgaeMicroalgaeveggood-0.5
13MSM (0.1%)MSMsupplementgood0.10.1
14glucosamine (0.09%)Glucosaminesupplementgood0.090.09
15chondroitin (0.03%)Chondroitinsupplementgood0.030.03

Brand

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-14
Scored with
Model v2 (methodology)

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Scored with model v2 on 2026-09-22. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-32.336+32.34
Average ingredient quality0.19.915+0.74
Meat share of dry matter8.7%0.116+1.01
Supplement share of dry matter2.3%-0.009-0.02
Other share of dry matter4.2%-0.371-1.58
Unrecognised share of dry matter84.7%-0.022-1.90
Undeclared quantities5.3%-0.131-0.69
Prints ingredient percentagesyes3.194+3.19
Complete dietyes1.703+1.70
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-1.988-1.99
Meat share × printed percentages8.7-0.073-0.64
Processing multiplier1.0032.336+32.34
Processing: Wet Pateyes2.935+2.94
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-32.336+32.34
Average ingredient quality0.19.915+0.74
Meat share of dry matter8.7%0.116+1.01
Carb share of dry matter0.0%-0.113+0.00
Oil share of dry matter0.0%-0.088+0.00
Vegetable share of dry matter0.0%-0.002+0.00
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.177+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter2.3%-0.009-0.02
Other share of dry matter4.2%-0.371-1.58
Unrecognised share of dry matter84.7%-0.022-1.90
Recipe graded poor0.0%-0.045+0.00
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.182+0.00
Number of poor ingredients0-0.868+0.00
Largest single poor ingredient0.0%0.056+0.00
Undeclared quantities5.3%-0.131-0.69
Prints ingredient percentagesyes3.194+3.19
Complete dietyes1.703+1.70
Frozen or chilled freshno11.440+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)no-0.506+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-1.988-1.99
High carb and low meatno-1.250+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages8.7-0.073-0.64
Meat share × fresh0.0-0.339+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.016.475+0.00
Additive penalty0.000.236+0.00
Processing multiplier1.0032.336+32.34
Processing: Rawno13.322+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno7.712+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno6.583+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno4.857+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno0.072+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno11.127+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno9.320+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno4.569+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-2.321+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedno-6.996+0.00
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.833+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.711+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateyes2.935+2.94
Processing: Wet Chunksno2.292+0.00
Processing-type offset
-0.16
Additives declared on label
+1 transparency bonus
Subtotal
68.3
Final score
68/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein10.150.5 (band 18 to 40%)100
Fat525 (band 5.5 to 20%)100
Fibre0.42 (band 0.5 to 5%)90
Energy (kcal/100g)114570100

Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.

Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
Printed percentages on the label (94.7% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)18.9/20
Analytical constituents declared (mandatory)15/15
Additives declared (mandatory)5/10
Energy value declared (voluntary)5/5
Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
Feeding guidance given (mandatory)10/10
Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The marketing claims made on the pack and product page, and how much evidence sits behind them. We record the claims as stated; we do not assess whether they are true.

ClaimTypeSubstantiation
Volledig en uitgebalanceerd (on page)FunctionalManufacturer assertion
Elf ingrediënten. Niets anders. (on page)ContentManufacturer assertion
45% vlees en organen van humane kwaliteit (on page)ContentManufacturer assertion
Kalkoenbasis met eend en gans (on page)ContentManufacturer assertion
94% dierlijke ingrediënten (on page)ContentManufacturer assertion

Limited: at least one claim rests on manufacturer assertion alone.

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Other products from Celtic Connection

Alternatives to Met Eend & Gans – Natvoer

Foods in our database that are similar on ingredients, protein, format or price. Scores and figures are from the same deterministic model used everywhere on the site.

See all alternatives

Community

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.