Royal Canin Maxi Dermacomfort

Dry Extruded · complete

Maxi Dermacomfort
Poor
our rating

Our verdict

Is Royal Canin Maxi Dermacomfort a good dog food?

We score it 33/100 (Poor). The main reasons are set out in "Why you might not" below, and every step of the calculation is shown under "How we calculated this score".

Complete extruded dry food for adult dogs, with wheat, vegetable protein extracts and rice as the main ingredients.

How we score

Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.

100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

Why you might choose it

  • Nutritionally complete: formulated to be fed as the whole diet.

Why you might not

  • 6 poor-graded ingredients make up about 43% of the recipe.
  • Meat makes up an estimated 7% of the dry matter (6% as fed); carbohydrates dominate.
  • 100% of the recipe mass has no printed percentage, so the exact split cannot be verified.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
  • Labelling or feeding guide is aimed at large dogs
  • Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids fish: the label lists fish oil
  • Your dog avoids grain: the label lists wheat

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 25% · Fat 17%

Typical analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fed
Protein25%
Fat17%
Fibre1.60%
Ash5.90%
Omega-3 fatty acids11.40%
Omega-6 fatty acids36%

Additives & feeding info

Feeding and storage

Storage

To be stored in a cool, dry place.

Feeding guide

Feeding instruction: see table. Batch number, factory registration number and best before date: see information on packaging. To be stored in a cool, dry place. Daily Feeding Recommendations Dog's Weight Normal activity level Moderate activity level Moderate activity level 26 kg 276 g (2+6/8 cups) 319 g (3+1/8 cups) 363 g (3+5/8 cups) 32 kg 322 g (3+2/8 cups) 373 g (3+6/8 cups) 424 g (4+2/8 cups) 38 kg 366 g (3+5/8 cups) 424 g (4+2/8 cups) 482 g (4+6/8 cups) 44 kg 409 g (4 cups) 473 g (4+6/8 cups) 538 g (5+3/8 cups) DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS PRODUCT? Our advisors will be happy to support you Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, Friday from 9:00am to 4:00pm and Wednesday 9:00am to 1:30pm via phone* on 0330 678 1540. You

Additives declared on the label

Nutritional additives

Vitamin A: 29500 IU/kg; Vitamin D3: 800 IU/kg; E1 (Iron): 73 mg/kg; E2 (Iodine): 6.1 mg/kg; E4 (Copper): 15 mg/kg; E5 (Manganese): 75 mg/kg; E6 (Zinc): 148 mg/kg; E8 (Selenium): 0.19 mg/kg

Technological additives

Preservatives; Antioxidants

Ingredients (16)100% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

  • carb 44.4%
  • oil 23.2%
  • supplement 11.2%
  • veg 9.4%
  • meat 6.1%
  • fibre 5.6%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
1wheatWheatcarb · poor-8.2
2vegetable protein isolateVegetable protein extractscarb · poor-7.9
3riceRice - whitecarb · medium-7.7
4animal fatsUnspecified Animal Fats and Oilsoil · poor-7.4
5maize glutenMaize glutencarb · poor-7.1
6maizeMaize / Corncarb · medium-6.9
7husked oatsOatscarb · medium-6.6
8mineralsVitamins and mineralssupplement · medium-6.4
9hydrolysed animal proteinsHydrolysed Animal Proteinmeat · medium-6.1
10soya oilSoybean oiloil · medium-5.9
11beet pulpBeet Pulpfibre · medium-5.6
12fish oilFish Oiloil · good-5.4
13flax seedsSeedsveg · poor-5.1
14fructo-oligo-saccharidesFructo-oligosaccharidessupplement · good-4.8
15borage oilBorage oiloil · good-4.6
16marigold extract (source of lutein)Calendulaveg · good-4.3
  1. 1. wheat8.2% estimated
    Wheat · carb · poor
  2. 2. vegetable protein isolate7.9% estimated
  3. 3. rice7.7% estimated
    Rice - white · carb · medium
  4. 4. animal fats7.4% estimated
  5. 5. maize gluten7.1% estimated
    Maize gluten · carb · poor
  6. 6. maize6.9% estimated
    Maize / Corn · carb · medium
  7. 7. husked oats6.6% estimated
    Oats · carb · medium
  8. 8. minerals6.4% estimated
    Vitamins and minerals · supplement · medium
  9. 9. hydrolysed animal proteins6.1% estimated
    Hydrolysed Animal Protein · meat · medium
  10. 10. soya oil5.9% estimated
    Soybean oil · oil · medium
  11. 11. beet pulp5.6% estimated
    Beet Pulp · fibre · medium
  12. 12. fish oil5.4% estimated
    Fish Oil · oil · good
  13. 13. flax seeds5.1% estimated
    Seeds · veg · poor
  14. 14. fructo-oligo-saccharides4.8% estimated
    Fructo-oligosaccharides · supplement · good
  15. 15. borage oil4.6% estimated
    Borage oil · oil · good
  16. 16. marigold extract (source of lutein)4.3% estimated
    Calendula · veg · good

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-08

Brand and contact: Royal Canin

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-08
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)
Product page
www.royalcanin.com

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Why this score?

This recipe achieves a final score of 33 out of 100. Several factors influence this rating. Specifically, ingredients without printed percentages contributed -10.6, while the processing format resulted in -6.7. Additionally, the carbohydrate content contributed -5.3 and the oil and fat content added -2.5.

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.19.191+0.84
Carb share of dry matter46.2%-0.115-5.32
Oil share of dry matter27.2%-0.092-2.50
Vegetable share of dry matter1.7%-0.005-0.01
Supplement share of dry matter12.2%-0.012-0.15
Recipe graded poor35.7%-0.065-2.32
Number of poor ingredients5-0.876-4.38
Largest single poor ingredient8.2%0.060+0.49
Undeclared quantities100.0%-0.106-10.56
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
High carb and low meatyes-1.180-1.18
Additive penalty-0.910.222-0.20
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.19.191+0.84
Meat share of dry matter0.0%0.096+0.00
Carb share of dry matter46.2%-0.115-5.32
Oil share of dry matter27.2%-0.092-2.50
Vegetable share of dry matter1.7%-0.005-0.01
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.163+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter12.2%-0.012-0.15
Other share of dry matter0.0%-0.375+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.027+0.00
Recipe graded poor35.7%-0.065-2.32
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.179+0.00
Number of poor ingredients5-0.876-4.38
Largest single poor ingredient8.2%0.060+0.49
Undeclared quantities100.0%-0.106-10.56
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)no0.707+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
High carb and low meatyes-1.180-1.18
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty-0.910.222-0.20
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
+0.02
Additives declared on label
+2 transparency bonus
Subtotal
33.2
Final score
33/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v333/100current
v231/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein2527.6 (band 18 to 40%)96.2
Fat1718.8 (band 5.5 to 20%)100
Fibre1.61.8 (band 0.5 to 5%)86.9
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3)--100

Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.

Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.

Declared fortification: 8 nutritional additives on the label
  • Vitamin A: 29500 IU/kg
  • Vitamin D3: 800 IU/kg
  • E1 (Iron): 73 mg/kg
  • E2 (Iodine): 6.1 mg/kg
  • E4 (Copper): 15 mg/kg
  • E5 (Manganese): 75 mg/kg
  • E6 (Zinc): 148 mg/kg
  • E8 (Selenium): 0.19 mg/kg

Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✗ Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file0/20
✗ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file0/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)10/10
✗ Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file0/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✓ Feeding guidance given (mandatory)10/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✓ Batch and date labelling (mandatory)5/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

Claims on file; none we can check against the label

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
For adult and mature large breed dogs (from 26 to 44 kg) - Over 15 months old - Dogs prone to skin irritation and itching (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
91% of owners are satisfied after 2 months (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
high-quality, low-allergen protein is included in this exclusive formula (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
This product includes Omega-3 and Omega-6 fatty acids, such as EPA, DHA and GLA (on page)Nutrientnot checkableManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Alternatives to Maxi Dermacomfort

Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.

See all alternatives

See all products from Royal Canin

Community0 comments

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.