Rockster A Fisherman's Dream

Wet Chunks · completeHigh meatClear label

A Fisherman's Dream
Good
our rating

Our verdict

Is Rockster A Fisherman's Dream a good dog food?

We score it 84/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.

Complete wet food in chunks for adult dogs, with salmon, calamari and mussels as the main ingredients.

How we score

Why you might choose it

  • Scores 84, in the top quarter of wet foods we track.
  • Meat makes up an estimated 85% of the dry matter (88% as fed).
  • Prints ingredient percentages on the label.

Why you might not

  • High in fat: 29% fat on a dry-matter basis.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
  • Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
  • Single named protein: fish
  • Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • You are limiting fat: 28.6% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 9.30% · Fat 8%

Typical analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fedDry matter
Protein9.30%33.20%
Fat8%28.60%
Fibre1.90%6.80%
Ash2.40%8.60%
Moisture72%-
Carbohydrates6.40%22.90%

Energy: 123 kcal/100g

Additives & feeding info

Feeding and storage

Storage

BPA-free can. Made in Germany.

Additives declared on the label

Nutritional additives

Vitamin A 2,200IU/kg; Vitamin E 12mg/kg; Vitamin B2 6mg/kg; Vitamin B1 2.5mg/kg; Vitamin B6 1.5mg/kg; Vitamin B9 0.3mg/kg; Vitamin B12 40µg/kg; Biotin 36µg/kg; Zinc (as Zinc sulphate monohydrate) 18mg/kg; Iron (as Ferrous sulphate monohydrate) 6.3mg/kg; Manganese (as Manganese-II-oxide) 0.9mg/kg

Ingredients (8)8 of 8 percentages printed

Estimated composition

  • meat 87.5%
  • veg 9.0%
  • carb 3.0%
  • unknown 0.5%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
182.5% Organic salmonSalmonmeat · good82.582.5
23% CalamariCalamarimeat · good33.0
32% MusselsMusselsmeat · good22.0
45% Organic courgetteCourgetteveg · good55.0
53% Organic quinoaQuinoacarb · good33.0
62% Organic quinceQuinceveg · good22.0
72% Organic carrotsCarrotsveg · good22.0
80.5% Organic fermented Jerusalem artichoke concentrateJerusalem Artichoke Powderfibre · good0.50.5
  1. 1. 82.5% Organic salmon82.5% declared82.5% estimated
    Salmon · meat · good
  2. 2. 3% Calamari3% declared3.0% estimated
    Calamari · meat · good
  3. 3. 2% Mussels2% declared2.0% estimated
    Mussels · meat · good
  4. 4. 5% Organic courgette5% declared5.0% estimated
    Courgette · veg · good
  5. 5. 3% Organic quinoa3% declared3.0% estimated
    Quinoa · carb · good
  6. 6. 2% Organic quince2% declared2.0% estimated
    Quince · veg · good
  7. 7. 2% Organic carrots2% declared2.0% estimated
    Carrots · veg · good
  8. 8. 0.5% Organic fermented Jerusalem artichoke concentrate0.5% declared0.5% estimated

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-14

Brand and contact: Rockster

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-14
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)
Product page
therockster.com

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Why this score?

This recipe scored 84 out of 100 in our review. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +9.1 points, while the meat content added +8.2 points and being labelled nutritionally complete added a further +2.3 points. The carbohydrate content worked against the score, taking -1.1 points off the total.

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality1.09.191+9.11
Meat share of dry matter85.2%0.096+8.18
Carb share of dry matter9.2%-0.115-1.06
Vegetable share of dry matter4.7%-0.005-0.02
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.9%-0.027-0.02
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes0.707+0.71
Processing multiplier1.0033.786+33.79
Processing: Wet Chunksyes-0.672-0.67
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality1.09.191+9.11
Meat share of dry matter85.2%0.096+8.18
Carb share of dry matter9.2%-0.115-1.06
Oil share of dry matter0.0%-0.092+0.00
Vegetable share of dry matter4.7%-0.005-0.02
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.163+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter0.0%-0.012+0.00
Other share of dry matter0.0%-0.375+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.9%-0.027-0.02
Recipe graded poor0.0%-0.065+0.00
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.179+0.00
Number of poor ingredients0-0.876+0.00
Largest single poor ingredient0.0%0.060+0.00
Undeclared quantities0.0%-0.106+0.00
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes0.707+0.71
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)no-3.158+0.00
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty0.000.222+0.00
Processing multiplier1.0033.786+33.79
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksyes-0.672-0.67
Processing-type offset
-0.08
Additives declared on label
+1 transparency bonus
Subtotal
84.1
Final score
84/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v384/100current
v287/100
v176/100
v1.978/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein9.333.2 (band 19.767857142857146 to 40%)100
Fat828.6 (band 6.040178571428572 to 20%)100
Fibre1.96.8 (band 0.5 to 5%)100
Energy (kcal/100g)123439.3100

Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.

Declared fortification: 11 nutritional additives on the label
  • Vitamin A 2,200IU/kg
  • Vitamin E 12mg/kg
  • Vitamin B2 6mg/kg
  • Vitamin B1 2.5mg/kg
  • Vitamin B6 1.5mg/kg
  • Vitamin B9 0.3mg/kg
  • Vitamin B12 40µg/kg
  • Biotin 36µg/kg
  • Zinc (as Zinc sulphate monohydrate) 18mg/kg
  • Iron (as Ferrous sulphate monohydrate) 6.3mg/kg
  • Manganese (as Manganese-II-oxide) 0.9mg/kg

Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (100% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)20/20
✓ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory)15/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)5/10
✓ Energy value declared (voluntary)5/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✗ Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file0/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

No on-pack claims on file: nothing to verify.

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Alternatives to A Fisherman's Dream

Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.

See all alternatives

See all products from Rockster

Community0 comments

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.