Forza10 Intestinal - Fish
Wet Chunks complete High meat Clear label

Is Forza10 Intestinal - Fish a good dog food?
We score it 83/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Why this score?
This recipe achieves an overall score of 83 out of 100 based on several key factors. The overall quality of the ingredient list added +9 points, while the meat content contributed +8.9 points. Additionally, printing percentages on the label added +3.2 points, and the processing format brought an extra +2.3 points to the total.
- Recipe83
- Nutritionalhigh96
- Transparency60
- Safety100
- Evidencelimited33
The Recipe score measures how attractive and transparent the declared ingredient list is. It is not, by itself, proof that the food is nutritionally appropriate for long-term feeding. The Nutritional and Evidence scores measure what we can verify towards that stronger claim.
Complete wet food in chunks for adult dogs, with salmon, white fish and vitamins and minerals as the main ingredients.
Why you might choose it
- Meat makes up an estimated 38% of the dry matter (54% as fed).
- Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
- Single named animal protein: fish.
Why you might not
- Around 48% of the recipe is generic or unspecified ingredients.
- High in fat: 20% fat on a dry-matter basis.
Estimated composition
Typical analysis (as fed)
- Protein
- 7.50%
- Fat
- 6.50%
- Fibre
- 0.10%
- Ash
- 1.90%
- Moisture
- 80%
- Omega-3 fatty acids
- 1.30%
- Omega-6 fatty acids
- 1.40%
- Sodium
- 0.16%
Energy: 101 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Nutritional additives
vitamin E 6.7 mg; vitamin B1 3.3 mg; vitamin B6 0.8 mg; vitamin H (Biotin) 0.04 mg; folic acid 0.01 mg; zinc sulphate monohydrate 10.9 mg (Zn 3.9 mg); manganous sulphate monohydrate 4.9 mg (Mn 1.6 mg); copper(II) sulphate pentahydrate 0.7 mg (Cu 0.15 mg)
Technological additives
Origanum vulgare 2000 mg; chestnut extract 406 mg
Storage
Keep cool and dry. Once open keep refrigerated.
Feeding guide
Up to 12 weeks for intestinal absorptive disorders; initially up to 12 weeks and lifetime in cases of chronic pancreatic insufficiency; 3 to 8 weeks for ingredient and nutrient intolerances. If signs of intolerance disappear this feed can be used initially up to one year.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Single named protein: fish
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - white
- You are limiting fat: 32.5% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (9)
| # | As declared | Matched | Category | Tier | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 90% salmon | Salmon | meat | good | 90 | 90.0 |
| 2 | rice 4% | Rice - white | carb | medium | 4 | 4.0 |
| 3 | vegetable fats and oils | Vegetable Fat | oil | medium | - | 1.4 |
| 4 | minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement | medium | - | 1.3 |
| 5 | potassium chloride 0.29% | Potassium Chloride | supplement | medium | 0.29 | 0.3 |
| 6 | mannan oligosaccharides (MOS) | Mannanoligosaccharides | supplement | good | - | 1.1 |
| 7 | Rosa canina | Rose Petals | veg | good | - | 1.0 |
| 8 | psyllium seeds (Plantago psyllium mucilage 1%) 0.1% | Psyllium | fibre | good | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| 9 | inulin from chicory | Chicory | veg | good | - | 0.8 |
Brand
- Website
- https://forza10.com/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-15
- Scored with
- Model v2 (methodology)
- Product page
- forza10.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Scored with model v2 on 2026-09-22. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.9 | 9.915 | +8.95 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 76.5% | 0.116 | +8.88 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 10.7% | -0.113 | -1.20 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 4.2% | -0.088 | -0.37 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 7.5% | -0.009 | -0.07 |
| Undeclared quantities | 5.6% | -0.131 | -0.73 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | yes | 3.194 | +3.19 |
| Complete diet | yes | 1.703 | +1.70 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | -0.506 | -0.51 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 76.5 | -0.073 | -5.61 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | yes | 2.292 | +2.29 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.9 | 9.915 | +8.95 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 76.5% | 0.116 | +8.88 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 10.7% | -0.113 | -1.20 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 4.2% | -0.088 | -0.37 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 0.8% | -0.002 | -0.00 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.177 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 7.5% | -0.009 | -0.07 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.371 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.022 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.045 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.182 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.868 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.056 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 5.6% | -0.131 | -0.73 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | yes | 3.194 | +3.19 |
| Complete diet | yes | 1.703 | +1.70 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 11.440 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | -0.506 | -0.51 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -1.988 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.250 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 76.5 | -0.073 | -5.61 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | -0.339 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 16.475 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.236 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Processing: Raw | no | 13.322 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | 7.712 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | 6.583 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 4.857 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | 0.072 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 11.127 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 9.320 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | 4.569 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -2.321 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.996 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.833 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.711 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | 2.935 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | yes | 2.292 | +2.29 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.01
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 83.2
- Final score
- 83/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
| Model | Score | |
|---|---|---|
| v2 | 83/100 | current |
| v1 | 75/100 | |
| v1.9 | 77/100 |
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 7.5 | 37.5 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 6.5 | 32.5 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 0.1 | 0.5 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 70 |
| Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3) | - | - | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 101 | 505 | 100 |
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.
Scored over 5 declared nutrients (combined weight 70); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
High confidence: full analysis plus minerals or omegas and declared energy.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (94.4% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 18.9/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The marketing claims made on the pack and product page, and how much evidence sits behind them. We record the claims as stated; we do not assess whether they are true.
| Claim | Type | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|
| Complete dietetic food for dogs (on page) | Content | Manufacturer assertion |
| Limited ingredients formula: made with only a few select and high quality ingredients to minimise the risk of food intolerance (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| a) Reduction of intestinal absorptive disorders b) compensation for maldigestion; exocrine pancreatic insufficiency c) reduction of ingredient and nutrient intolerances (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Monoprotein: formulated with an alternative single source of animal protein: fish protein high in biological value and bioavailability (on page) | Content | Manufacturer assertion |
Limited: at least one claim rests on manufacturer assertion alone.
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Other products from Forza10
Alternatives to Intestinal - Fish
Foods in our database that are similar on ingredients, protein, format or price. Scores and figures are from the same deterministic model used everywhere on the site.
Community
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.







