Our verdict
Is Forza10 Intestinal - Fish a good dog food?
We score it 82/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete wet food in chunks for adult dogs, with salmon, white fish and vitamins and minerals as the main ingredients.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Single named protein: fish
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - white
- You are limiting fat: 32.5% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 7.50% · Fat 6.50%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 7.50% |
| Fat | 6.50% |
| Fibre | 0.10% |
| Ash | 1.90% |
| Moisture | 80% |
| Omega-3 fatty acids | 1.30% |
| Omega-6 fatty acids | 1.40% |
| Sodium | 0.16% |
Energy: 101 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Keep cool and dry. Once open keep refrigerated.
Feeding guide
Up to 12 weeks for intestinal absorptive disorders; initially up to 12 weeks and lifetime in cases of chronic pancreatic insufficiency; 3 to 8 weeks for ingredient and nutrient intolerances. If signs of intolerance disappear this feed can be used initially up to one year.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
vitamin E 6.7 mg; vitamin B1 3.3 mg; vitamin B6 0.8 mg; vitamin H (Biotin) 0.04 mg; folic acid 0.01 mg; zinc sulphate monohydrate 10.9 mg (Zn 3.9 mg); manganous sulphate monohydrate 4.9 mg (Mn 1.6 mg); copper(II) sulphate pentahydrate 0.7 mg (Cu 0.15 mg)
Technological additives
Origanum vulgare 2000 mg; chestnut extract 406 mg
Ingredients (9)6% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 90.0%
- carb 4.0%
- supplement 2.7%
- veg 1.8%
- oil 1.4%
- fibre 0.1%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 90% salmon | Salmon | meat · good | 90 | 90.0 |
| 2 | rice 4% | Rice - white | carb · medium | 4 | 4.0 |
| 3 | vegetable fats and oils (Palm oil) | Vegetable Fat | oil · medium | - | 1.4 |
| 4 | minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 1.3 |
| 5 | potassium chloride 0.29% | Potassium Chloride | supplement · medium | 0.29 | 0.3 |
| 6 | mannan oligosaccharides (MOS) | Mannanoligosaccharides | supplement · good | - | 1.1 |
| 7 | Rosa canina | Rose Petals | veg · good | - | 1.0 |
| 8 | psyllium seeds (Plantago psyllium mucilage 1%) 0.1% | Psyllium | fibre · good | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| 9 | inulin from chicory | Chicory | veg · good | - | 0.8 |
- 1. 90% salmon90% declared90.0% estimated
- 2. rice 4%4% declared4.0% estimated
- 3. vegetable fats and oils (Palm oil)1.4% estimated
- 4. minerals1.3% estimated
- 5. potassium chloride 0.29%0.29% declared0.3% estimated
- 6. mannan oligosaccharides (MOS)1.1% estimated
- 7. Rosa canina1.0% estimated
- 8. psyllium seeds (Plantago psyllium mucilage 1%) 0.1%0.1% declared0.1% estimated
- 9. inulin from chicory0.8% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-15
Brand and contact: Forza10
- Website
- https://forza10.com/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-15
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- forza10.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
We scored this product 82 out of 100, drawing on several factors. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +8.3 points, while the meat content added +7.3 points. Being labelled nutritionally complete gave +2.3, and printing percentages for most of the recipe contributed +2.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.9 | 9.191 | +8.30 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 76.5% | 0.096 | +7.35 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 10.7% | -0.115 | -1.23 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 4.2% | -0.092 | -0.39 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 7.5% | -0.012 | -0.09 |
| Undeclared quantities | 5.6% | -0.106 | -0.59 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.9 | 9.191 | +8.30 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 76.5% | 0.096 | +7.35 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 10.7% | -0.115 | -1.23 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 4.2% | -0.092 | -0.39 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 0.8% | -0.005 | -0.00 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 7.5% | -0.012 | -0.09 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 5.6% | -0.106 | -0.59 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 82.3
- Final score
- 82/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 7.5 | 37.5 (band 22.724999999999998 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 6.5 | 32.5 (band 6.94375 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 0.1 | 0.5 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 70 |
| Sodium | 0.16 | 0.8 (band 0.12625+%) | 100 |
| Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3) | - | - | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 101 | 505 | 100 |
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.
Scored over 6 declared nutrients (combined weight 75); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 8 nutritional additives on the label
- vitamin E 6.7 mg
- vitamin B1 3.3 mg
- vitamin B6 0.8 mg
- vitamin H (Biotin) 0.04 mg
- folic acid 0.01 mg
- zinc sulphate monohydrate 10.9 mg (Zn 3.9 mg)
- manganous sulphate monohydrate 4.9 mg (Mn 1.6 mg)
- copper(II) sulphate pentahydrate 0.7 mg (Cu 0.15 mg)
High confidence: full analysis plus minerals or omegas and declared energy.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (94.4% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 18.9/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 2 checkable claims: 2 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "Complete dietetic food for dogs" — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.
- "Monoprotein: formulated with an alternative single source of animal protein: fish protein high in biological value and bioavailability" — supported by the declared single protein data.
2 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Complete dietetic food for dogs (on page) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Limited ingredients formula: made with only a few select and high quality ingredients to minimise the risk of food intolerance (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| a) Reduction of intestinal absorptive disorders b) compensation for maldigestion; exocrine pancreatic insufficiency c) reduction of ingredient and nutrient intolerances (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Monoprotein: formulated with an alternative single source of animal protein: fish protein high in biological value and bioavailability (on page) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Intestinal - Fish
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.