Purizon Original Black Angus Beef with Turkey Adult – Grain-free
Wet Chunks · completeHigh meatClear label

Our verdict
Is Purizon Original Black Angus Beef with Turkey Adult – Grain-free a good dog food?
We score it 76/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete wet food in chunks for adult dogs, with beef, salmon and chicken as the main ingredients.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list lamb, venison, pork as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken
- Your dog avoids beef: the label lists beef
- Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists turkey
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists salmon
- Your dog avoids duck: the label lists duck
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
- You are limiting fat: 20.0% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 39% · Fat 20%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 39% |
| Fat | 20% |
| Fibre | 1.50% |
| Ash | 7.30% |
| Omega-3 fatty acids | 0.50% |
| Omega-6 fatty acids | 2.50% |
| Calcium | 1.50% |
| Phosphorus | 1.10% |
Energy: 413 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Store in a cool, dry place, away from direct sunlight. Please make sure your pet always has fresh drinking water available.
Feeding guide
Dog's weight: 2.5kg 45-60g; 5kg 75-105g; 10kg 130-175g; 15kg 175-240g; 20kg 215-295g; 25kg 255-350g; 30kg 295-400g; 40kg 365-500g; 50kg 430-590g; 60+kg 495+g. When changing food, introduce gradually over approx. two weeks. Serve dry.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A 18,000 IU/kg; vitamin D3 1,500 IU/kg; vitamin E 180 IU/kg; vitamin C 140mg/kg; vitamin B1 (thiamine mononitrate) 8mg/kg; vitamin B2 (riboflavin) 8mg/kg; vitamin B6 (pyridoxine hydrochloride) 6mg/kg; vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamine) 30mcg/kg; biotin 250mcg/kg; choline chloride 1,200mg/kg; folic acid 0.8mg/kg; niacin 50mg/kg; calcium-D-pantothenate 24mg/kg; taurine 1,500mg/kg; zinc (zinc oxide) 100mg/kg; manganese (manganous oxide) 10.0mg/kg; copper (copper(II) sulphate pentahydrate) 8.0mg/kg; iodine (calcium iodate, anhydrous) 2.6mg/kg; DL-methionine 1,000mg/kg
Ingredients (29)20% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 72.0%
- veg 15.5%
- oil 8.0%
- carb 2.6%
- fibre 1.9%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20% fresh Black Angus beef | Beef | meat · medium | 20 | 20.0 |
| 2 | 19% fresh salmon | Salmon | meat · good | 19 | 19.0 |
| 3 | 18% chicken meat | Chicken | meat · medium | 18 | 18.0 |
| 4 | 8% turkey meat | Turkey | meat · medium | 8 | 8.0 |
| 5 | potatoes | Potatoes | carb · medium | - | 1.3 |
| 6 | sweet potatoes | Sweet Potatoes | carb · good | - | 1.3 |
| 7 | 7% poultry fat | Poultry Fat | oil · medium | 7 | 7.0 |
| 8 | 3% duck meat | Duck | meat · medium | 3 | 3.0 |
| 9 | 3% poultry proteins | Hydrolysed Poultry Protein | meat · medium | 3 | 3.0 |
| 10 | peas | Peas | veg · good | - | 1.2 |
| 11 | 1% egg | Egg | meat · good | 1 | 1.0 |
| 12 | 1% salmon oil | Salmon Oil | oil · good | 1 | 1.0 |
| 13 | linseed | Linseed | veg · good | - | 1.2 |
| 14 | psyllium husks | Psyllium | fibre · good | - | 1.2 |
| 15 | apples | Apples | veg · good | - | 1.1 |
| 16 | carrots | Carrots | veg · good | - | 1.1 |
| 17 | cranberries | Cranberries | veg · good | - | 1.1 |
| 18 | spinach | Spinach | veg · good | - | 1.0 |
| 19 | thyme | Thyme | veg · good | - | 1.0 |
| 20 | oregano | Oregano | veg · good | - | 1.0 |
| 21 | sage | Sage | veg · good | - | 1.0 |
| 22 | parsley | Parsley | veg · good | - | 0.9 |
| 23 | marjoram | Marjoram | veg · good | - | 0.9 |
| 24 | chamomile | Chamomile | veg · good | - | 0.9 |
| 25 | aniseed | Aniseed | veg · good | - | 0.8 |
| 26 | fenugreek | Fenugreek | veg · good | - | 0.8 |
| 27 | marigold | Calendula | veg · good | - | 0.8 |
| 28 | peppermint | Peppermint | veg · good | - | 0.7 |
| 29 | chicory inulin | Inulin | fibre · good | - | 0.7 |
- 1. 20% fresh Black Angus beef20% declared20.0% estimated
- 2. 19% fresh salmon19% declared19.0% estimated
- 3. 18% chicken meat18% declared18.0% estimated
- 4. 8% turkey meat8% declared8.0% estimated
- 5. potatoes1.3% estimated
- 6. sweet potatoes1.3% estimated
- 7. 7% poultry fat7% declared7.0% estimated
- 8. 3% duck meat3% declared3.0% estimated
- 9. 3% poultry proteins3% declared3.0% estimated
- 10. peas1.2% estimated
- 11. 1% egg1% declared1.0% estimated
- 12. 1% salmon oil1% declared1.0% estimated
- 13. linseed1.2% estimated
- 14. psyllium husks1.2% estimated
- 15. apples1.1% estimated
- 16. carrots1.1% estimated
- 17. cranberries1.1% estimated
- 18. spinach1.0% estimated
- 19. thyme1.0% estimated
- 20. oregano1.0% estimated
- 21. sage1.0% estimated
- 22. parsley0.9% estimated
- 23. marjoram0.9% estimated
- 24. chamomile0.9% estimated
- 25. aniseed0.8% estimated
- 26. fenugreek0.8% estimated
- 27. marigold0.8% estimated
- 28. peppermint0.7% estimated
- 29. chicory inulin0.7% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-15
Brand and contact: Purizon
- Contact page
- www.zooplus.co.uk
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-15
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.zooplus.co.uk
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
213 reviews on this product · 3.9/5
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The recipe scores 76 out of 100. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +6.2 points, and the meat content contributed +5.8. Being labelled nutritionally complete added a further +2.3 points. On the downside, ingredients without printed percentages deducted -2.1 points from the total.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.7 | 9.191 | +6.19 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 60.0% | 0.096 | +5.76 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 1.8% | -0.115 | -0.20 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 21.5% | -0.092 | -1.98 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 12.1% | -0.005 | -0.06 |
| Undeclared quantities | 20.0% | -0.106 | -2.11 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.7 | 9.191 | +6.19 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 60.0% | 0.096 | +5.76 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 1.8% | -0.115 | -0.20 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 21.5% | -0.092 | -1.98 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 12.1% | -0.005 | -0.06 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.012 | +0.00 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 20.0% | -0.106 | -2.11 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 75.5
- Final score
- 76/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 39 | 185.7 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 20 | 95.2 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 1.5 | 7.1 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Calcium | 1.5 | 7.1 (band 0.5 to 2.5%) | 0 |
| Phosphorus | 1.1 | 5.2 (band 0.4 to 1.6%) | 0 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.4 | 1.4 (band 1 to 2%) | 91.8 |
| Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3) | - | - | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 413 | 1966.7 | 50 |
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.
Scored over 8 declared nutrients (combined weight 100); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 79% from the food type.
Portion-control flag: 413 kcal/100g as fed with fat at 95.2% dry matter, above the reference band. High-energy foods need smaller portions.
Declared fortification: 19 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin A 18,000 IU/kg
- vitamin D3 1,500 IU/kg
- vitamin E 180 IU/kg
- vitamin C 140mg/kg
- vitamin B1 (thiamine mononitrate) 8mg/kg
- vitamin B2 (riboflavin) 8mg/kg
- vitamin B6 (pyridoxine hydrochloride) 6mg/kg
- vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamine) 30mcg/kg
- biotin 250mcg/kg
- choline chloride 1,200mg/kg
- folic acid 0.8mg/kg
- niacin 50mg/kg
- calcium-D-pantothenate 24mg/kg
- taurine 1,500mg/kg
- zinc (zinc oxide) 100mg/kg
- manganese (manganous oxide) 10.0mg/kg
- copper (copper(II) sulphate pentahydrate) 8.0mg/kg
- iodine (calcium iodate, anhydrous) 2.6mg/kg
- DL-methionine 1,000mg/kg
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (80% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 16/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · strong — 4 checkable claims: 4 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "no grain or gluten" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
- "Grain-free" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
- "39% animal protein" — supported by the declared high protein data.
- "Complete dry food for adult dogs" — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.
5 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Strong: at least three checkable claims, all consistent with the declared label, and no compliance cap.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| contains 80% meat ingredients and 20% nutritious fruit & veg (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| no grain or gluten (on page) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| made with 20% Black Angus beef (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| easy to digest meal (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Grain-free (on pack) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| 39% animal protein (on page) | High/low level | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| free from artificial preservatives and colours (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Wholesome dry dog food with a protein-rich 80:20:0 recipe (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Complete dry food for adult dogs (on pack) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Original Black Angus Beef with Turkey Adult – Grain-free
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.



