Pro Plan Everyday Nutrition Turkey in Jelly Wet Dog Food
Wet Chunks · completeClear label
Our verdict
Is Pro Plan Everyday Nutrition Turkey in Jelly Wet Dog Food a good dog food?
We score it 40/100 (Poor). The main reasons are set out in "Why you might not" below, and every step of the calculation is shown under "How we calculated this score".
Complete wet food in chunks for adult dogs, with meat and animal derivatives, green beans and sugars as the main ingredients.
86% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids turkey: it is listed as an ingredient
- You are limiting fat: 21.1% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 8.50% · Fat 4%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 8.50% |
| Fat | 4% |
| Fibre | 0.30% |
| Ash | 2.50% |
| Moisture | 81% |
Energy: 82 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
Mixed feeding guide (cans/day and cans+g dry) for body weights 1-10 kg, 10-25 kg, 25-45 kg, 45-85 kg using PRO PLAN Adult Medium dry as reference; adjust to maintain lean body weight.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A: 700 IU/kg; Vitamin D3: 97 IU/kg; Iron (II) sulphate monohydrate (Fe: 8.5 mg/kg); Calcium iodate anhydrous (I: 0.24 mg/kg); Copper (II) sulphate pentahydrate (Cu: 0.6 mg/kg); Manganous sulphate monohydrate (Mn: 1.1 mg/kg); Zinc sulphate monohydrate (Zn: 12 mg/kg)
Technological additives
Cassia Gum: 2500 mg/kg; Flavourings
Ingredients (4)86% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 32.0%
- veg 26.0%
- other 16.5%
- supplement 15.0%
- additive 10.5%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Meat and animal derivatives | Meat and Animal Derivatives | meat · poor | - | 49.1 |
| 2 | 0.5% dried green bean | Green Beans | veg · good | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| 3 | equivalent to 4.5% of green bean | Green Beans | veg · good | - | 13.5 |
| 4 | Various sugars | Sugars | additive · poor | - | 36.9 |
- 1. Meat and animal derivatives49.1% estimated
- 2. 0.5% dried green bean0.5% declared0.5% estimated
- 3. equivalent to 4.5% of green bean13.5% estimated
- 4. Various sugars36.9% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-12
Brand and contact: Pro Plan
- Phone
- 0800 212 161
- Contact page
- www.purina.co.uk
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-12
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.purina.co.uk
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 1.8/5 · 628 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The overall score came in at 40 out of 100. Undeclared ingredient shares (ingredients without printed percentages) pulled the score down by -9, and the remaining ingredients took off another -6.9. On the positive side, the additives in the recipe added +3.4. Lower-quality meat ingredients reduced the total by -3.2.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | -0.2 | 9.191 | -2.18 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 8.8% | 0.096 | +0.84 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 9.6% | -0.005 | -0.05 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 21.1% | 0.163 | +3.44 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 30.8% | -0.012 | -0.38 |
| Other share of dry matter | 18.4% | -0.375 | -6.91 |
| Recipe graded poor | 45.0% | -0.065 | -2.92 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 18.0% | -0.179 | -3.22 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 3 | -0.876 | -2.63 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 18.0% | 0.060 | +1.08 |
| Undeclared quantities | 85.5% | -0.106 | -9.03 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -14.46 | 0.222 | -3.21 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | -0.2 | 9.191 | -2.18 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 8.8% | 0.096 | +0.84 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.115 | +0.00 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.092 | +0.00 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 9.6% | -0.005 | -0.05 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 21.1% | 0.163 | +3.44 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 30.8% | -0.012 | -0.38 |
| Other share of dry matter | 18.4% | -0.375 | -6.91 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 45.0% | -0.065 | -2.92 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 18.0% | -0.179 | -3.22 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 3 | -0.876 | -2.63 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 18.0% | 0.060 | +1.08 |
| Undeclared quantities | 85.5% | -0.106 | -9.03 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -14.46 | 0.222 | -3.21 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 39.9
- Final score
- 40/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 8.5 | 44.7 (band 19.42105263157895 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 4 | 21.1 (band 5.934210526315789 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 0.3 | 1.6 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 84.4 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 82 | 431.6 | 100 |
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 7 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin A: 700 IU/kg
- Vitamin D3: 97 IU/kg
- Iron (II) sulphate monohydrate (Fe: 8.5 mg/kg)
- Calcium iodate anhydrous (I: 0.24 mg/kg)
- Copper (II) sulphate pentahydrate (Cu: 0.6 mg/kg)
- Manganous sulphate monohydrate (Mn: 1.1 mg/kg)
- Zinc sulphate monohydrate (Zn: 12 mg/kg)
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (14.5% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 2.9/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "high protein content helps maintain strong muscles" — supported by the declared high protein data.
7 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| No Colourants (on pack) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| High nutrient absorption (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Formulated with fibre to support healthy digestion (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Science based nutrition (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| support healthy joints for an active lifestyle (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| keep their coat shiny from root to tip (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| high protein content helps maintain strong muscles (on page) | High/low level | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| contains high-quality ingredients and always has lamb, chicken, turkey or fish as the #1 ingredient (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Everyday Nutrition Turkey in Jelly Wet Dog Food
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.