Pets at Home Complete Nutrition Crunchy Mixer

Dry Extruded · complete

Complete Nutrition Crunchy Mixer
Poor
our rating

Our verdict

Is Pets at Home Complete Nutrition Crunchy Mixer a good dog food?

We score it 19/100 (Poor). The main reasons are set out in "Why you might not" below, and every step of the calculation is shown under "How we calculated this score".

Complete extruded dry food for adult dogs, with cereals, vegetable by and meat and animal derivatives as the main ingredients.

How we score

Declared analysis sits below the FEDIAF minimum for protein.

Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.

98% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

Why you might choose it

  • Low in fat for its format: 8% fat on a dry-matter basis.
  • Nutritionally complete: formulated to be fed as the whole diet.

Why you might not

  • 4 poor-graded ingredients make up about 83% of the recipe.
  • Low in protein: 13% protein on a dry-matter basis.
  • Meat makes up an estimated 9% of the dry matter (22% as fed); carbohydrates dominate.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
  • Doesn't list chicken, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids beef: the label lists beef
  • Your dog avoids grain: the label lists cereals
  • You need more protein than this: 13.0% on a dry-matter basis is in the low band

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 13% · Fat 8%

Typical analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fed
Protein13%
Fat8%
Fibre4.50%
Ash6%
Calcium1.30%
Phosphorus0.60%

Additives & feeding info

Feeding and storage

Feeding guide

Not suitable for puppies of any age.

Additives declared on the label

Nutritional additives

Vitamin A 17,000 IU; Vitamin D3 1,500 IU; Vitamin E 70 mg; Zinc (as Zinc Oxide) 100 mg; Iron (as Iron (ll) Sulphate Monohydrate) 60 mg; Manganese (as Manganese (ll) Oxide) 50 mg; Copper (as Copper (II) Sulphate Pentahydrate) 8 mg; Iodine (as Calcium Iodate, Anhydrous) 2.5 mg; Selenium (as Sodium Selenite) 0.10 mg

Technological additives

Antioxidants

Ingredients (6)98% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

  • carb 24.4%
  • meat 22.0%
  • other 21.9%
  • oil 17.1%
  • supplement 14.6%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
1CerealsCerealscarb · poor-24.4
2Derivatives of Vegetable OriginVegetable By-Productsother · poor-21.9
3Meat and Animal DerivativesMeat and Animal Derivativesmeat · poor-19.5
42.5% BeefBeefmeat · medium2.52.5
5Oils and FatsOils and Fatsoil · poor-17.1
6MineralsVitamins and mineralssupplement · medium-14.6
  1. 1. Cereals24.4% estimated
    Cereals · carb · poor
  2. 2. Derivatives of Vegetable Origin21.9% estimated
    Vegetable By-Products · other · poor
  3. 3. Meat and Animal Derivatives19.5% estimated
  4. 4. 2.5% Beef2.5% declared2.5% estimated
    Beef · meat · medium
  5. 5. Oils and Fats17.1% estimated
    Oils and Fats · oil · poor
  6. 6. Minerals14.6% estimated
    Vitamins and minerals · supplement · medium

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-13

Brand and contact: Pets at Home

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-13
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)
Product page
www.petsathome.com

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.

1 reviews on this product · 5.0/5

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Why this score?

This recipe achieves a final score of 19 out of 100 based on our evaluation. Ingredients without printed percentages change the score by -10.3, while the processing format adjusts it by -6.7. Additionally, the overall quality of the ingredient list accounts for a change of -6.4, and the remaining ingredients contribute -6 to the total.

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality-0.79.191-6.36
Meat share of dry matter1.0%0.096+0.10
Carb share of dry matter31.1%-0.115-3.58
Oil share of dry matter24.5%-0.092-2.26
Supplement share of dry matter19.5%-0.012-0.24
Other share of dry matter15.9%-0.375-5.96
Recipe graded poor82.9%-0.065-5.39
Poor-quality meat in recipe19.5%-0.179-3.48
Number of poor ingredients4-0.876-3.50
Largest single poor ingredient24.4%0.060+1.46
Undeclared quantities97.5%-0.106-10.29
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
Additive penalty-1.560.222-0.35
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality-0.79.191-6.36
Meat share of dry matter1.0%0.096+0.10
Carb share of dry matter31.1%-0.115-3.58
Oil share of dry matter24.5%-0.092-2.26
Vegetable share of dry matter0.0%-0.005+0.00
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.163+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter19.5%-0.012-0.24
Other share of dry matter15.9%-0.375-5.96
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.027+0.00
Recipe graded poor82.9%-0.065-5.39
Poor-quality meat in recipe19.5%-0.179-3.48
Number of poor ingredients4-0.876-3.50
Largest single poor ingredient24.4%0.060+1.46
Undeclared quantities97.5%-0.106-10.29
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)no0.707+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty-1.560.222-0.35
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
+0.02
Additives declared on label
+2 transparency bonus
Subtotal
18.6
Final score
19/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v319/100current
v219/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein1314.4 (band 18 to 40%)55.9
Fat88.8 (band 5.5 to 20%)83.8
Fibre4.55 (band 0.5 to 5%)100
Calcium1.31.4 (band 0.5 to 2.5%)98.1
Phosphorus0.60.7 (band 0.4 to 1.6%)83.1
Calcium:phosphorus ratio2.22.2 (band 1 to 2%)91.7

Scored over 6 declared nutrients (combined weight 80); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.

Declared fortification: 9 nutritional additives on the label
  • Vitamin A 17,000 IU
  • Vitamin D3 1,500 IU
  • Vitamin E 70 mg
  • Zinc (as Zinc Oxide) 100 mg
  • Iron (as Iron (ll) Sulphate Monohydrate) 60 mg
  • Manganese (as Manganese (ll) Oxide) 50 mg
  • Copper (as Copper (II) Sulphate Pentahydrate) 8 mg
  • Iodine (as Calcium Iodate, Anhydrous) 2.5 mg
  • Selenium (as Sodium Selenite) 0.10 mg

Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (2.5% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)0.5/20
✗ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file0/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)10/10
✗ Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file0/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✓ Feeding guidance given (mandatory)10/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

Claims on file; none we can check against the label

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
Calcium and vitamin D - Supports strong teeth & bones (on pack)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Added vitamin E & selenium - to support the digestive system (on pack)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Crunchy kibble - To help keep teeth clean (on pack)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Enriched with vitamins and minerals for their wellbeing and nutrition. (on pack)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
No added artificial colours, flavours or preservatives (on pack)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion
A complete pet food for adult dogs with added chicken for a flavour they will love. (on pack)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Alternatives to Complete Nutrition Crunchy Mixer

Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.

See all alternatives

See all products from Pets at Home

Community0 comments

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.