Pero Working Dog Active

Dry Extruded · complete

Working Dog Active
Poor
our rating

Our verdict

Is Pero Working Dog Active a good dog food?

We score it 36/100 (Poor). The main reasons are set out in "Why you might not" below, and every step of the calculation is shown under "How we calculated this score".

Complete extruded dry food for adult dogs, with cereals, fresh meat and unspecified animal fats and oils as the main ingredients.

How we score

Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.

100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

Why you might choose it

  • Nutritionally complete: formulated to be fed as the whole diet.

Why you might not

  • 3 poor-graded ingredients make up about 35% of the recipe.
  • 100% of the recipe mass has no printed percentage, so the exact split cannot be verified.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
  • Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids fish: the label lists fish meal
  • Your dog avoids grain: the label lists cereals

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 25% · Fat 10%

Typical analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fed
Protein25%
Fat10%
Fibre2%
Ash7.50%

Additives & feeding info

Feeding and storage

Storage

Store in cool, dry conditions away from direct sunlight. Once opened, store in an airtight container.

Feeding guide

Weight 4-9kg: 100-200g; 9-20kg: 250-400g; 20-45kg: 250-500g daily.

Additives declared on the label

Nutritional additives

Vitamin A 11,000 IU/kg; Vitamin D3 1,200 IU/kg; Vitamin E 125 IU/kg; Copper (as Cupric Sulphate) 25 mg/kg; Vitamin B1; Vitamin B2; Vitamin B6; Vitamin B12; Biotin; Folic Acid; Nicotinic Acid (Niacin); Pantothenic Acid (Calcium Pantothenate); Deodorase (Yucca plant extract)

Technological additives

Deodorase, A natural extract from the Yucca plant, to aid in neutralising offensive odours in waste

Ingredients (10)100% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

  • carb 34.8%
  • oil 28.4%
  • meat 21.9%
  • supplement 14.8%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
1Extruded CerealsCerealscarb · poor-12.9
2Meat ProductsFresh Meatmeat · medium-12.3
3Flaked CerealsCerealscarb · poor-11.6
4Animal FatsUnspecified Animal Fats and Oilsoil · poor-11.0
5PastaPastacarb · medium-10.3
6Fish MealFish Mealmeat · medium-9.7
7Vegetable OilsVegetable Oils and Fatsoil · medium-9.0
8Linseed OilLinseed oiloil · good-8.4
9VitaminsVitamins and mineralssupplement · medium-7.7
10MineralsVitamins and mineralssupplement · medium-7.1
  1. 1. Extruded Cereals12.9% estimated
    Cereals · carb · poor
  2. 2. Meat Products12.3% estimated
    Fresh Meat · meat · medium
  3. 3. Flaked Cereals11.6% estimated
    Cereals · carb · poor
  4. 4. Animal Fats11.0% estimated
  5. 5. Pasta10.3% estimated
    Pasta · carb · medium
  6. 6. Fish Meal9.7% estimated
    Fish Meal · meat · medium
  7. 7. Vegetable Oils9.0% estimated
    Vegetable Oils and Fats · oil · medium
  8. 8. Linseed Oil8.4% estimated
    Linseed oil · oil · good
  9. 9. Vitamins7.7% estimated
    Vitamins and minerals · supplement · medium
  10. 10. Minerals7.1% estimated
    Vitamins and minerals · supplement · medium

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-14

Brand and contact: Pero

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-14
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)
Product page
pero-online.co.uk

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.

Trustpilot: 4.9/5 · 292 reviews

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Why this score?

This recipe achieves a final score of 36 out of 100. Several factors influence this rating. Specifically, ingredients without printed percentages contributed -10.6, while the processing format resulted in -6.7. Additionally, the carbohydrate content contributed -3.6 and the oil and fat content added -3.3.

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality-0.19.191-0.63
Carb share of dry matter30.9%-0.115-3.55
Oil share of dry matter35.9%-0.092-3.31
Supplement share of dry matter17.4%-0.012-0.21
Recipe graded poor35.5%-0.065-2.31
Number of poor ingredients3-0.876-2.63
Largest single poor ingredient12.9%0.060+0.77
Undeclared quantities100.0%-0.106-10.56
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
Additive penalty-0.510.222-0.11
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality-0.19.191-0.63
Meat share of dry matter0.0%0.096+0.00
Carb share of dry matter30.9%-0.115-3.55
Oil share of dry matter35.9%-0.092-3.31
Vegetable share of dry matter0.0%-0.005+0.00
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.163+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter17.4%-0.012-0.21
Other share of dry matter0.0%-0.375+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.027+0.00
Recipe graded poor35.5%-0.065-2.31
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.179+0.00
Number of poor ingredients3-0.876-2.63
Largest single poor ingredient12.9%0.060+0.77
Undeclared quantities100.0%-0.106-10.56
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)no0.707+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty-0.510.222-0.11
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
+0.02
Additives declared on label
+2 transparency bonus
Subtotal
35.9
Final score
36/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v336/100current
v236/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein2527.6 (band 18 to 40%)96.2
Fat1011 (band 5.5 to 20%)93
Fibre22.2 (band 0.5 to 5%)92.8

Scored over 3 declared nutrients (combined weight 50); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.

Declared fortification: 13 nutritional additives on the label
  • Vitamin A 11,000 IU/kg
  • Vitamin D3 1,200 IU/kg
  • Vitamin E 125 IU/kg
  • Copper (as Cupric Sulphate) 25 mg/kg
  • Vitamin B1
  • Vitamin B2
  • Vitamin B6
  • Vitamin B12
  • Biotin
  • Folic Acid
  • Nicotinic Acid (Niacin)
  • Pantothenic Acid (Calcium Pantothenate)
  • Deodorase (Yucca plant extract)

Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✗ Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file0/20
✗ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file0/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)10/10
✗ Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file0/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✓ Feeding guidance given (mandatory)10/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

50/100 · limited — 2 checkable claims: 1 consistent, 1 contradicted.

Contradicted by the label

  • "High in Protein" — the declared label says otherwise on high protein.

Consistent with the label

  • "Complete and balanced food. It contains everything your dog needs and requires no additional supplements" — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.

7 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.

Limited: at least one claim contradicts the declared label, or a recent upheld ASA ruling applies.

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
Maximum performance dog food with 25% protein to keep working dogs energized throughout their day, especially during the active season (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Sustained Energy Release - Pasta provides a valuable carbohydrate source for energy that releases steadily over time (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Naturally Odour Reducing - Deodorase, a natural Yucca plant extract that helps neutralise odours in waste (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
High in Protein (on pack)High/low levelcontradictedManufacturer assertion
Made with high quality natural ingredients to keep dogs healthy and happy (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
All Natural Ingredients (on pack)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Enriched with Vitamins and Minerals (on pack)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Complete and balanced food. It contains everything your dog needs and requires no additional supplements (on page)ContentconsistentManufacturer assertion
No artificial colours, flavours, or preservatives (on page)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Alternatives to Working Dog Active

Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.

See all alternatives

See all products from Pero

Community0 comments

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.