Orijen Tundra

Dry Extruded complete High meat Clear label

Tundra
Good
our rating

Is Orijen Tundra a good dog food?

We score it 71/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.

How we score

Why this score?

This recipe achieves an overall score of 71 out of one hundred. The meat content contributed +8.8 to this total, alongside the overall quality of the ingredient list which added +7.8. However, the processing format brought a deduction of -7, while printing percentages on the label provided a further addition of +3.2.

The Recipe score measures how attractive and transparent the declared ingredient list is. It is not, by itself, proof that the food is nutritionally appropriate for long-term feeding. The Nutritional and Evidence scores measure what we can verify towards that stronger claim.

Complete extruded dry food for dogs of all life stages, with lamb, venison and duck as the main ingredients.

Why you might choose it

  • Scores 71, in the top quarter of dry foods we track.
  • Meat makes up an estimated 76% of the dry matter.
  • Prints ingredient percentages on the label.

Why you might not

  • High in fat: 21% fat on a dry-matter basis.

View the source page

Estimated composition

meat76.0%
veg12.5%
unknown5.0%
oil4.0%
carb1.8%
fibre0.6%

Typical analysis (as fed)

Protein
40%
Fat
18%
Fibre
5%
Ash
9%
Moisture
12%
Omega-3 fatty acids
1%
Omega-6 fatty acids
2.60%
Calcium
1.80%
Phosphorus
1.30%

Additives & feeding info

Nutritional additives

Zinc 105 mg; Copper 5.5 mg; Vitamin B1 9.8 mg; Vitamin E 120 IU

Technological additives

Tocopherol extract from vegetable oils 121 mg; citric acid 40 mg

Storage

Store in cool, dry place.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
  • Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
  • Doesn't list beef as an ingredient

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists poultry fat
  • Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists poultry fat
  • Your dog avoids lamb: the label lists lamb
  • Your dog avoids fish: the label lists raw arctic char
  • Your dog avoids venison: the label lists venison
  • Your dog avoids pork: the label lists pork
  • Your dog avoids duck: the label lists duck
  • You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
  • You are limiting fat: 20.5% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.

Ingredients (51)

#As declaredMatchedCategoryTierDeclared %Est. %
1Raw lamb (7%)Lambmeatmedium77.0
2raw venison (5%)Venisonmeatgood55.0
3raw duck (5%)Duckmeatmedium55.0
4raw arctic char (5%)unmatched--55.0
5raw whole pilchard (5%)Sardinesmeatgood55.0
6raw pork (5%)Porkmeatmedium55.0
7raw duck liver (5%)Livermeatgood55.0
8raw lamb liver (4%)Livermeatgood44.0
9fresh eggs (4%)Eggmeatgood44.0
10dehydrated lamb (4%)Meat Mealmeatmedium44.0
11dehydrated whitefish (4%)White Fishmeatgood44.0
12dehydrated blue whiting (4%)Whitingmeatgood44.0
13dehydrated mutton (4%)Muttonmeatgood44.0
14dehydrated herring (4%)Herringmeatgood44.0
15dehydrated mackerel (4%)Mackerelmeatgood44.0
16raw goat (4%)Goatmeatgood44.0
17raw pork liver (4%)Livermeatgood44.0
18whole green lentilsLentilsveggood-0.7
19whole chickpeasChickpeasveggood-0.7
20whole peasPeasveggood-0.7
21raw steelhead trout (3%)Troutmeatgood33.0
22duck fat (3%)Poultry Fatoilmedium33.0
23whole red lentilsLentilsveggood-0.6
24whole pinto beansWhole Pinto Beanscarbgood-0.6
25lentil fibreLentil Fiberfibregood-0.6
26pollock oil (1%)Pollock Oiloilgood11.0
27whole navy beansWhole Navy Beanscarbgood-0.6
28pea starchPea Starchcarbpoor-0.6
29raw lamb kidney (0.5%)Kidneymeatgood0.50.5
30raw lamb tripe (0.5%)Tripemeatmedium0.50.5
31dried kelpKelpveggood-0.6
32fresh whole pumpkinPumpkinveggood-0.6
33fresh whole butternut squashButternut Squashveggood-0.6
34fresh whole zucchiniCourgetteveggood-0.6
35fresh whole carrotsCarrotsveggood-0.5
36fresh whole applesApplesveggood-0.5
37fresh whole pearsPearsveggood-0.5
38dried chicory rootChicory rootveggood-0.5
39fresh kaleKaleveggood-0.5
40fresh spinachSpinachveggood-0.5
41fresh beet greensFresh Beet Greensveggood-0.5
42fresh turnip greensTurnipveggood-0.5
43whole cranberriesCranberriesveggood-0.4
44whole blueberriesBlueberriesveggood-0.4
45whole saskatoon berriesWhole Saskatoon Berriesveggood-0.4
46turmericTurmericveggood-0.4
47milk thistleMilk Thistleveggood-0.4
48burdock rootBurdock Rootveggood-0.4
49lavenderLavenderveggood-0.4
50marshmallow rootMarshmallow Rootveggood-0.4
51rosehipsRose Hipveggood-0.4

Brand

Orijen logo
Phone
01737 767679
Address
Bancroft Place, 10 Bancroft Road, Reigate, Surrey, RH2 7RP, UK

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-14
Scored with
Model v2 (methodology)

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Scored with model v2 on 2026-09-22. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-32.336+32.34
Average ingredient quality0.89.915+7.81
Meat share of dry matter75.9%0.116+8.80
Carb share of dry matter3.4%-0.113-0.38
Oil share of dry matter8.2%-0.088-0.72
Vegetable share of dry matter6.2%-0.002-0.01
Unrecognised share of dry matter5.2%-0.022-0.12
Recipe graded poor0.6%-0.045-0.03
Number of poor ingredients1-0.868-0.87
Largest single poor ingredient0.6%0.056+0.03
Undeclared quantities15.0%-0.131-1.96
Prints ingredient percentagesyes3.194+3.19
Complete dietyes1.703+1.70
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes-0.506-0.51
Meat share × printed percentages75.9-0.073-5.56
Processing multiplier1.0032.336+32.34
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.996-7.00
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-32.336+32.34
Average ingredient quality0.89.915+7.81
Meat share of dry matter75.9%0.116+8.80
Carb share of dry matter3.4%-0.113-0.38
Oil share of dry matter8.2%-0.088-0.72
Vegetable share of dry matter6.2%-0.002-0.01
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.177+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter0.0%-0.009+0.00
Other share of dry matter0.0%-0.371+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter5.2%-0.022-0.12
Recipe graded poor0.6%-0.045-0.03
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.182+0.00
Number of poor ingredients1-0.868-0.87
Largest single poor ingredient0.6%0.056+0.03
Undeclared quantities15.0%-0.131-1.96
Prints ingredient percentagesyes3.194+3.19
Complete dietyes1.703+1.70
Frozen or chilled freshno11.440+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes-0.506-0.51
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)no-1.988+0.00
High carb and low meatno-1.250+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages75.9-0.073-5.56
Meat share × fresh0.0-0.339+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.016.475+0.00
Additive penalty0.000.236+0.00
Processing multiplier1.0032.336+32.34
Processing: Rawno13.322+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno7.712+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno6.583+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno4.857+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno0.072+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno11.127+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno9.320+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno4.569+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-2.321+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.996-7.00
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.833+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.711+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno2.935+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno2.292+0.00
Processing-type offset
-0.01
Additives declared on label
+2 transparency bonus
Subtotal
71.1
Final score
71/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v271/100current
v170/100
v1.971/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein4045.5 (band 18 to 40%)100
Fat1820.5 (band 5.5 to 20%)100
Fibre55.7 (band 0.5 to 5%)100
Calcium1.82 (band 0.5 to 2.5%)100
Phosphorus1.31.5 (band 0.4 to 1.6%)100
Calcium:phosphorus ratio1.41.4 (band 1 to 2%)93.1
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3)--100

Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.

Scored over 7 declared nutrients (combined weight 90); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.

Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
Printed percentages on the label (85% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)17/20
Analytical constituents declared (mandatory)15/15
Additives declared (mandatory)10/10
Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file0/5
Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file0/10
Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)10/10
Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The marketing claims made on the pack and product page, and how much evidence sits behind them. We record the claims as stated; we do not assess whether they are true.

ClaimTypeSubstantiation
freeze-dried coated for a burst of raw flavour (on page)FunctionalManufacturer assertion
Biologically Appropriate diet rich and varied in whole animal ingredients (on page)ContentManufacturer assertion source
with raw ingredients like duck, fish and venison (on page)ContentManufacturer assertion
Packed with WholePrey animal ingredients like organs and bone (on page)ContentManufacturer assertion
85% quality duck, fish and meat ingredients, providing a strong source of essential protein, vitamins, and minerals (on page)ContentManufacturer assertion
85% quality animal ingredients (on page)ContentManufacturer assertion
coated with freeze-dried liver (on page)ContentManufacturer assertion

Limited: at least one claim rests on manufacturer assertion alone.

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Other products from Orijen

Alternatives to Tundra

Foods in our database that are similar on ingredients, protein, format or price. Scores and figures are from the same deterministic model used everywhere on the site.

See all alternatives

Community

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.