Natural Greatness Beef with Iberian Pork, Green Beans, Sweet Potato and Cranberries
Wet Chunks · completeHigh meatClear label
Our verdict
Is Natural Greatness Beef with Iberian Pork, Green Beans, Sweet Potato and Cranberries a good dog food?
We score it 62/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete wet food in chunks for dogs of all life stages, with beef, pork and heart as the main ingredients.
66% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list chicken, turkey, lamb, venison, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids beef: the label lists beef
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists salmon oil
- Your dog avoids pork: the label lists pork
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
- You are limiting fat: 40.0% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 6.40% · Fat 8.40%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 6.40% |
| Fat | 8.40% |
| Fibre | 1% |
| Ash | 1.70% |
| Moisture | 79% |
Energy: 105.9 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Once opened, refrigerate the can and consume within 48 hours.
Feeding guide
Dosage table is indicative; amount may vary depending on activity, breed and environmental conditions. Always provide fresh water.
No additives recorded yet.
Ingredients (9)66% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 46.5%
- other 14.8%
- carb 13.2%
- veg 11.9%
- supplement 11.5%
- oil 2.0%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Beef meat (26%) | Beef | meat · medium | 26 | 26.0 |
| 2 | Pork meat (20%) | Pork | meat · medium | 20 | 20.0 |
| 3 | Iberian pork heart (4%) | Heart | meat · good | 4 | 4.0 |
| 4 | Broth | Cooking broth | other · medium | - | 14.2 |
| 5 | Salmon oil (2%) | Salmon Oil | oil · good | 2 | 2.0 |
| 6 | Green beans (2%) | Green Beans | veg · good | 2 | 2.0 |
| 7 | Sweet potato | Sweet Potatoes | carb · good | - | 12.4 |
| 8 | Minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 10.6 |
| 9 | Cranberries | Cranberries | veg · good | - | 8.8 |
- 1. Beef meat (26%)26% declared26.0% estimated
- 2. Pork meat (20%)20% declared20.0% estimated
- 3. Iberian pork heart (4%)4% declared4.0% estimated
- 4. Broth14.2% estimated
- 5. Salmon oil (2%)2% declared2.0% estimated
- 6. Green beans (2%)2% declared2.0% estimated
- 7. Sweet potato12.4% estimated
- 8. Minerals10.6% estimated
- 9. Cranberries8.8% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-15
Brand and contact: Natural Greatness
- Contact page
- naturalgreatness.co.uk
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-15
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- naturalgreatness.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves an overall score of 62 out of 100 based on several key factors. The meat content contributed +2.6 points and the overall quality of the ingredient list added +5.8 points to the total. However, the carbohydrate content resulted in a deduction of -1.2 points, and ingredients without printed percentages reduced the score by -7 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.77 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 26.7% | 0.096 | +2.56 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 10.5% | -0.115 | -1.21 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 6.3% | -0.092 | -0.58 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 5.7% | -0.005 | -0.03 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 33.8% | -0.012 | -0.41 |
| Other share of dry matter | 2.4% | -0.375 | -0.88 |
| Undeclared quantities | 66.0% | -0.106 | -6.97 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.77 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 26.7% | 0.096 | +2.56 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 10.5% | -0.115 | -1.21 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 6.3% | -0.092 | -0.58 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 5.7% | -0.005 | -0.03 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 33.8% | -0.012 | -0.41 |
| Other share of dry matter | 2.4% | -0.375 | -0.88 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 66.0% | -0.106 | -6.97 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | no | 2.294 | +0.00 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Subtotal
- 62.2
- Final score
- 62/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 6.4 | 30.5 (band 22.692857142857143 to 40%) | 97 |
| Fat | 8.4 | 40 (band 6.933928571428571 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 1 | 4.8 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 105.9 | 504.3 | 100 |
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
No nutritional additives section declared on the label.
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (34% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 6.8/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Additives declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 2 checkable claims: 2 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "complete wet food for puppies and adult dogs" — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.
- "formulated without cereals" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
4 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| complete wet food for puppies and adult dogs (on pack) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| contains high-quality sources of protein: beef, pork, and Iberian pork, with high biological value proteins (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| provides essential amino acids for the development and muscle health (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| green beans provide natural fiber to improve digestion, vitamins, minerals, and healthy carbohydrates (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| ultra-premium and hypoallergenic (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| formulated without cereals (on page) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Beef with Iberian Pork, Green Beans, Sweet Potato and Cranberries
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.