Masters Dog Foods Sensitive Maintenance
Dry Extruded · completeClear label
Our verdict
Is Masters Dog Foods Sensitive Maintenance a good dog food?
We score it 56/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete extruded dry food for senior dogs, with whole, rice and dehydrated poultry proteins as the main ingredients.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
63% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for senior dogs
- Doesn't list beef, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists dehydrated poultry proteins
- Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists dehydrated poultry proteins
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists whole-grain maize
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
- You need more protein than this: 18.5% on a dry-matter basis is in the low band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 18.50% · Fat 8%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 18.50% |
| Fat | 8% |
| Fibre | 4% |
| Ash | 4% |
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
Body Weight 1-10 kg: 30-155 g; 10-15 kg: 155-210 g; 15-25 kg: 210-310 g; 25-35 kg: 310-395 g; 35-45 kg: 395-480 g; 45+ kg: 480g+. Add warm water and feed immediately. Alternatively, Sensitive Maintenance can be fed either soaked or dry. Drinking water should always be available.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A 20,000 iu/kg; Vitamin D3 2,000 iu/kg; Vitamin E 110 mg/kg
Ingredients (12)63% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- carb 40.4%
- supplement 21.9%
- meat 16.5%
- fibre 9.7%
- oil 8.9%
- veg 2.5%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole Maize | Whole-Grain Maize | carb · medium | - | 8.9 |
| 2 | White Rice (18.5%) | Rice - white | carb · medium | 18.5 | 18.5 |
| 3 | Poultry Meal (16.5%) | Dehydrated Poultry Proteins | meat · good | 16.5 | 16.5 |
| 4 | Whole Oats | Oat Groats | carb · good | - | 8.4 |
| 5 | Sugar Beet Pellets | Beet Pulp | fibre · medium | - | 7.9 |
| 6 | Whole Linseed (2.5%) | Linseed | veg · good | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| 7 | Poultry Oil | Poultry Fat | oil · medium | - | 7.4 |
| 8 | Brewers Yeast | Brewer's Yeast | supplement · good | - | 6.9 |
| 9 | Glucosamine | Glucosamine | supplement · good | - | 6.4 |
| 10 | MSM | MSM | supplement · good | - | 6.0 |
| 11 | Chondroitin | Chondroitin | supplement · good | - | 5.5 |
| 12 | Extract of Yucca Schidigera | Yucca Schidigera | supplement · good | - | 5.0 |
- 1. Whole Maize8.9% estimated
- 2. White Rice (18.5%)18.5% declared18.5% estimated
- 3. Poultry Meal (16.5%)16.5% declared16.5% estimated
- 4. Whole Oats8.4% estimated
- 5. Sugar Beet Pellets7.9% estimated
- 6. Whole Linseed (2.5%)2.5% declared2.5% estimated
- 7. Poultry Oil7.4% estimated
- 8. Brewers Yeast6.9% estimated
- 9. Glucosamine6.4% estimated
- 10. MSM6.0% estimated
- 11. Chondroitin5.5% estimated
- 12. Extract of Yucca Schidigera5.0% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-14
Brand and contact: Masters Dog Foods
- Phone
- 01327 811758
- Address
- Hilltop Farm South Kilworth Road Walcote Leicestershire LE17 4LA
- Contact page
- mastersdogfoods.co.uk
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-14
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- mastersdogfoods.co.uk
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves an overall rating of 56 out of 100 based on several key factors. The overall quality of the ingredient list adds +6.3 points to the total. However, the processing format subtracts -6.7 points, and ingredients without printed percentages deduct -6.6 points. Additionally, the carbohydrate content contributes -4.5 points to the final assessment.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.7 | 9.191 | +6.33 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 16.7% | 0.096 | +1.61 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 39.2% | -0.115 | -4.51 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 9.7% | -0.092 | -0.90 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 2.5% | -0.005 | -0.01 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 22.2% | -0.012 | -0.27 |
| Undeclared quantities | 62.5% | -0.106 | -6.60 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.7 | 9.191 | +6.33 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 16.7% | 0.096 | +1.61 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 39.2% | -0.115 | -4.51 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 9.7% | -0.092 | -0.90 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 2.5% | -0.005 | -0.01 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 22.2% | -0.012 | -0.27 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 62.5% | -0.106 | -6.60 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 56.3
- Final score
- 56/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 18.5 | 20.4 (band 18 to 40%) | 76.7 |
| Fat | 8 | 8.8 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 83.8 |
| Fibre | 4 | 4.4 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
Scored over 3 declared nutrients (combined weight 50); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.
Declared fortification: 3 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin A 20,000 iu/kg
- Vitamin D3 2,000 iu/kg
- Vitamin E 110 mg/kg
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (37.5% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 7.5/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linseed is added for glossy coat condition (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| includes Joint Care (Glucosamine, MSM and Chondroitin) helping to support and maintain healthy joints (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Wheat-Gluten free (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Contains British Chicken & Rice (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| wheat gluten-free (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| No added soya or dairy or artificial flavours or colours (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| hypoallergenic (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| low in protein and fat (on page) | High/low level | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| supply Omega 3 and Omega 6 essential fatty acids (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Sensitive Maintenance
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.