Lukullus Cold-Pressed Angus Beef & Duck
Dry Cold Pressed · completeClear label
Our verdict
Is Lukullus Cold-Pressed Angus Beef & Duck a good dog food?
We score it 55/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
50% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Doesn't list chicken, turkey, lamb, venison, pork as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids beef: the label lists beef
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists white fish
- Your dog avoids duck: the label lists duck
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - brown / whole grain
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 24.90% · Fat 9.90%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed | Dry matter |
|---|---|---|
| Protein | 24.90% | 33.20% |
| Fat | 9.90% | 13.20% |
| Fibre | 5.90% | 7.90% |
| Ash | 7.40% | 9.90% |
Energy: 328 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Store in a cool, dry place. Do not store in an airtight container. Shelf life of only 8 months from the time of manufacturing.
Feeding guide
Serve dry. Fresh water always available. Daily amounts: 5kg 95-135g; 10kg 165-225g; 15kg 220-300g; 20kg 275-375g; 25kg 325-445g; 30kg 370-510g; 35kg 415-570g; 40kg 460-630g; 45kg 505-690g; 50kg 625-855g.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A 10,000 IU; vitamin C 140 mg; vitamin D3 1,000 IU; vitamin E 200 IU; vitamin B1 (thiamine mononitrate) 3.5 mg; vitamin B2 (riboflavin) 7 mg; vitamin B6 (pyridoxine hydrochloride) 4.2 mg; vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin) 42 mcg; biotin 210 mcg; folic acid 0.35 mg; niacin 21 mg; calcium D-pantothenate 7 mg; choline chloride 1,050 mg; Manganese (manganese(II) oxide) 48 mg; Copper (copper(II) oxide) 10 mg; Zinc (zinc oxide) 62.5 mg; Iodine (calcium iodate) 1.6 mg
Ingredients (19)50% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- carb 27.4%
- meat 25.4%
- veg 24.1%
- supplement 8.4%
- oil 3.5%
- fibre 3.3%
- other 3.2%
- additive 2.6%
- mineral 2.3%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9.65% from Angus beef | Beef | meat · medium | 9.65 | 9.7 |
| 2 | 9.65% dried and ground | Beetroot | veg · good | 9.65 | 9.7 |
| 3 | 19% wholegrain rice | Rice - brown / whole grain | carb · medium | 19 | 19.0 |
| 4 | 12% duck meat | Duck | meat · medium | 12 | 12.0 |
| 5 | potatoes | Potatoes | carb · medium | - | 4.3 |
| 6 | linseed | Linseed | veg · good | - | 4.2 |
| 7 | millet | Millet | carb · good | - | 4.0 |
| 8 | herbs | Herbs | veg · medium | - | 3.9 |
| 9 | white fish oil | White Fish | meat · good | - | 3.7 |
| 10 | seaweed | Seaweed | veg · good | - | 3.6 |
| 11 | rapeseed oil | Rapeseed oil | oil · good | - | 3.5 |
| 12 | beet pulp | Beet Pulp | fibre · medium | - | 3.3 |
| 13 | dried peat | Moor | other · medium | - | 3.2 |
| 14 | yucca schidigera (dried and ground) | Yucca Schidigera | supplement · good | - | 3.0 |
| 15 | fennel seed | Fennel Seed | supplement · good | - | 2.9 |
| 16 | apples | Apples | veg · good | - | 2.7 |
| 17 | medicinal clay | Clay | additive · medium | - | 2.6 |
| 18 | mussel meat extract from Perna canaliculus | Green-Lipped Mussel | supplement · good | - | 2.4 |
| 19 | algal lime | Algal Lime | mineral · medium | - | 2.3 |
- 1. 9.65% from Angus beef9.65% declared9.7% estimated
- 2. 9.65% dried and ground9.65% declared9.7% estimated
- 3. 19% wholegrain rice19% declared19.0% estimated
- 4. 12% duck meat12% declared12.0% estimated
- 5. potatoes4.3% estimated
- 6. linseed4.2% estimated
- 7. millet4.0% estimated
- 8. herbs3.9% estimated
- 9. white fish oil3.7% estimated
- 10. seaweed3.6% estimated
- 11. rapeseed oil3.5% estimated
- 12. beet pulp3.3% estimated
- 13. dried peat3.2% estimated
- 14. yucca schidigera (dried and ground)3.0% estimated
- 15. fennel seed2.9% estimated
- 16. apples2.7% estimated
- 17. medicinal clay2.6% estimated
- 18. mussel meat extract from Perna canaliculus2.4% estimated
- 19. algal lime2.3% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-15
Brand and contact: Lukullus
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-15
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.zooplus.co.uk
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
8 reviews on this product · 3.9/5
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +6.7 points, which was the main driver of the score. The processing format reduced the result by -6.7 points, and ingredients without printed percentages took off a further -5.2 points. The carbohydrate content also lowered the score by -3.8 points. Altogether, these factors give a final score of 55 out of 100.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.7 | 9.191 | +6.70 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 9.3% | 0.096 | +0.89 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 32.7% | -0.115 | -3.76 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 5.2% | -0.092 | -0.48 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 25.5% | -0.005 | -0.13 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 3.6% | 0.163 | +0.58 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 11.8% | -0.012 | -0.14 |
| Other share of dry matter | 2.4% | -0.375 | -0.91 |
| Undeclared quantities | 49.7% | -0.106 | -5.25 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -3.11 | 0.222 | -0.69 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.7 | 9.191 | +6.70 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 9.3% | 0.096 | +0.89 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 32.7% | -0.115 | -3.76 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 5.2% | -0.092 | -0.48 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 25.5% | -0.005 | -0.13 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 3.6% | 0.163 | +0.58 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 11.8% | -0.012 | -0.14 |
| Other share of dry matter | 2.4% | -0.375 | -0.91 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 49.7% | -0.106 | -5.25 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -3.11 | 0.222 | -0.69 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 54.9
- Final score
- 55/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 24.9 | 27.2 (band 18 to 40%) | 95 |
| Fat | 9.9 | 10.8 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 91.9 |
| Fibre | 5.9 | 6.4 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 328 | 357.7 | 100 |
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 8.3% from the food type.
Declared fortification: 17 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin A 10,000 IU
- vitamin C 140 mg
- vitamin D3 1,000 IU
- vitamin E 200 IU
- vitamin B1 (thiamine mononitrate) 3.5 mg
- vitamin B2 (riboflavin) 7 mg
- vitamin B6 (pyridoxine hydrochloride) 4.2 mg
- vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin) 42 mcg
- biotin 210 mcg
- folic acid 0.35 mg
- niacin 21 mg
- calcium D-pantothenate 7 mg
- choline chloride 1,050 mg
- Manganese (manganese(II) oxide) 48 mg
- Copper (copper(II) oxide) 10 mg
- Zinc (zinc oxide) 62.5 mg
- Iodine (calcium iodate) 1.6 mg
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (50.3% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 10.1/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "complete dry dog food" — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.
7 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Helps to clean the teeth thanks to its carefully designed kibble shape (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| supports shiny fur and smooth skin (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| we do not use artificial additives such as preservatives, colourings or flavour enhancers (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| complete food for adult dogs of all breeds (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| High-quality protein from first-rate meat: tender Angus beef and delicate duck (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| complete dry dog food (on page) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Naturally preserved, free from genetically modified ingredients, gluten-free (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| high-quality dog food with hearty Angus beef and tender duck, wholegrain rice and apples, natural recipe, carefully cold-pressed (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Cold-Pressed Angus Beef & Duck
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.