Lenda Nature Senior/Mobility

Dry Extruded · completeHigh meatClear label

55out of 100

Average

our rating

Our verdict

Is Lenda Nature Senior/Mobility a good dog food?

We score it 55/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.

Complete extruded dry food for senior dogs, with peas, dehydrated turkey protein and rice as the main ingredients.

How we score

63% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

Why you might choose it

Meat makes up an estimated 31% of the dry matter (26% as fed).
Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
Declares energy content, which most labels omit.

Why you might not

We found no significant drawbacks in the data we hold for this product.

Who is this food for?

Suits

Labelled by the manufacturer for senior dogs
Doesn't list beef, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken oil and fat
Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists dehydrated turkey protein
Your dog avoids fish: the label lists krill
Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - white
You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 24% · Fat 12%

Typical analysis (as fed)

Nutrient	As fed
Protein	24%
Fat	12%
Fibre	2.80%
Ash	6.50%
Moisture	10%
Calcium	1.20%
Phosphorus	0.78%

Energy: 344 kcal/100g

Additives & feeding info

Additives declared on the label

Nutritional additives

Hierro (como carbonato de hierro (II)) 250 mg/kg; Iodo (como Ioduro potásico) 3 mg/kg; Cobre (como sulfato de cobre (II) pentahidratado) 10 mg/kg; Manganeso (como óxido manganoso) 51 mg/kg; Zinc (como óxido de zinc) 210 mg/kg; Selenio (como selenito sódico) 0,4 mg/kg; Vitamina A 20000 IU/kg; Vitamina D3 2000 IU/Kg; Vitamina E (α-Tocoferol) 115 mg/Kg

Technological additives

Conservantes y antioxidantes (extractos de cítricos y tocoferoles)

Ingredients (24)63% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

meat 25.8%
carb 21.2%
supplement 19.6%
veg 12.3%
fibre 6.8%
oil 4.1%
unknown 3.9%
other 3.6%
additive 2.8%

#	As declared	Matched	Label reading	Declared %	Est. %
1	Peeled peas	Peas	veg · good	-	4.2
2	dehydrated Turkey protein 21%	Dehydrated turkey protein	meat · good	21	21.0
3	whole rice 14%	Rice - white	carb · medium	14	14.0
4	refined chicken oil	Chicken Oil and Fat	oil · good	-	4.1
5	Saccharomyces cerevisiae	Brewer's Yeast	supplement · good	-	4.0
6	a source of mannan-oligosaccharide MOS	unmatched	-	-	3.9
7	potato starch	Potato starch	carb · poor	-	3.7
8	hydrolyzed protein	Protein Hydrolysate	other · poor	-	3.6
9	beet pulp	Beet Pulp	fibre · medium	-	3.5
10	pea starch	Pea Starch	carb · poor	-	3.4
11	egg powder	Dried Whole Egg	meat · good	-	3.3
12	dried krill 1.5%	Krill	meat · good	1.5	1.5
13	carob flour	Carob Flour	fibre · medium	-	3.2
14	mineral substances	Vitamins and minerals	supplement · medium	-	3.1
15	tomato	Tomato	veg · good	-	3.0
16	carrot	Carrots	veg · good	-	2.9
17	citric extract (a source of natural antioxidants)	Citric Extract	additive · medium	-	2.8
18	collagen	Collagen	supplement · good	-	2.7
19	glucosamine sulphate	Glucosamine	supplement · good	-	2.6
20	chondroitin sulphate	Chondroitin	supplement · good	-	2.5
21	MSM (Methylsulfonylmethane)	MSM	supplement · good	-	2.4
22	nucleotides	Nucleotides	supplement · medium	-	2.3
23	cranberry extract (0.01%)	Cranberry Extract	supplement · good	0.01	0.01
24	root chicory (a source of inulin – FOS, yucca extract, a selection of natural herbs (Melissa officinalis, Minthostachys verticillata, Cinnamomum verum, Rosmarinus officinalis, Gentiana, Vaccinium macrocarpon))	Chicory	veg · good	-	2.2

1. Peeled peas4.2% estimated
Peas · veg · good
2. dehydrated Turkey protein 21%21% declared21.0% estimated
Dehydrated turkey protein · meat · good
3. whole rice 14%14% declared14.0% estimated
Rice - white · carb · medium
4. refined chicken oil4.1% estimated
Chicken Oil and Fat · oil · good
5. Saccharomyces cerevisiae4.0% estimated
Brewer's Yeast · supplement · good
6. a source of mannan-oligosaccharide MOS3.9% estimated
unmatched
7. potato starch3.7% estimated
Potato starch · carb · poor
8. hydrolyzed protein3.6% estimated
Protein Hydrolysate · other · poor
9. beet pulp3.5% estimated
Beet Pulp · fibre · medium
10. pea starch3.4% estimated
Pea Starch · carb · poor
11. egg powder3.3% estimated
Dried Whole Egg · meat · good
12. dried krill 1.5%1.5% declared1.5% estimated
Krill · meat · good
13. carob flour3.2% estimated
Carob Flour · fibre · medium
14. mineral substances3.1% estimated
Vitamins and minerals · supplement · medium
15. tomato3.0% estimated
Tomato · veg · good
16. carrot2.9% estimated
Carrots · veg · good
17. citric extract (a source of natural antioxidants)2.8% estimated
Citric Extract · additive · medium
18. collagen2.7% estimated
Collagen · supplement · good
19. glucosamine sulphate2.6% estimated
Glucosamine · supplement · good
20. chondroitin sulphate2.5% estimated
Chondroitin · supplement · good
21. MSM (Methylsulfonylmethane)2.4% estimated
MSM · supplement · good
22. nucleotides2.3% estimated
Nucleotides · supplement · medium
23. cranberry extract (0.01%)0.01% declared0.01% estimated
Cranberry Extract · supplement · good
24. root chicory (a source of inulin – FOS, yucca extract, a selection of natural herbs (Melissa officinalis, Minthostachys verticillata, Cinnamomum verum, Rosmarinus officinalis, Gentiana, Vaccinium macrocarpon))2.2% estimated
Chicory · veg · good

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-14

Brand and contact: Lenda

Website: https://lenda.net/

Trust and provenance

Recall history: No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked: 2026-09-14
Scored with: Model v3 (methodology)
Product page: shop.lenda.net

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Why this score?

This recipe achieves an overall rating of 55 out of 100. The meat content contributed +2.6 points, while the overall quality of the ingredient list added +5.5 points to the total. However, the processing format reduced the score by -6.7 and ingredients without printed percentages decreased it by -6.7.

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

Component	Input	Coefficient	Contribution
Base score	-	30.909	+30.91
Average ingredient quality	0.6	9.191	+5.47
Meat share of dry matter	27.1%	0.096	+2.61
Carb share of dry matter	21.3%	-0.115	-2.46
Oil share of dry matter	5.3%	-0.092	-0.48
Vegetable share of dry matter	2.4%	-0.005	-0.01
Additive share of dry matter	3.3%	0.163	+0.54
Supplement share of dry matter	23.6%	-0.012	-0.29
Other share of dry matter	2.4%	-0.375	-0.89
Unrecognised share of dry matter	2.5%	-0.027	-0.07
Recipe graded poor	10.8%	-0.065	-0.70
Number of poor ingredients	3	-0.876	-2.63
Largest single poor ingredient	3.7%	0.060	+0.22
Undeclared quantities	63.5%	-0.106	-6.70
Complete diet	yes	2.294	+2.29
Additive penalty	-3.37	0.222	-0.75
Processing multiplier	0.98	33.786	+33.11
Processing: Dry Extruded	yes	-6.713	-6.71

Show all 40 components

Component	Input	Coefficient	Contribution
Base score	-	30.909	+30.91
Average ingredient quality	0.6	9.191	+5.47
Meat share of dry matter	27.1%	0.096	+2.61
Carb share of dry matter	21.3%	-0.115	-2.46
Oil share of dry matter	5.3%	-0.092	-0.48
Vegetable share of dry matter	2.4%	-0.005	-0.01
Additive share of dry matter	3.3%	0.163	+0.54
Supplement share of dry matter	23.6%	-0.012	-0.29
Other share of dry matter	2.4%	-0.375	-0.89
Unrecognised share of dry matter	2.5%	-0.027	-0.07
Recipe graded poor	10.8%	-0.065	-0.70
Poor-quality meat in recipe	0.0%	-0.179	+0.00
Number of poor ingredients	3	-0.876	-2.63
Largest single poor ingredient	3.7%	0.060	+0.22
Undeclared quantities	63.5%	-0.106	-6.70
Prints ingredient percentages	no	0.000	+0.00
Complete diet	yes	2.294	+2.29
Frozen or chilled fresh	no	0.000	+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)	no	0.707	+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)	no	-3.158	+0.00
High carb and low meat	no	-1.180	+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages	0.0	0.000	+0.00
Meat share × fresh	0.0	0.000	+0.00
Fresh × high meat	0.0	11.084	+0.00
Additive penalty	-3.37	0.222	-0.75
Processing multiplier	0.98	33.786	+33.11
Processing: Raw	no	-0.054	+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilled	no	-2.354	+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozen	no	-2.354	+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigerated	no	0.000	+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelf	no	-0.672	+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Dried	no	6.629	+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Dried	no	6.331	+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressed	no	-6.713	+0.00
Processing: Dry Baked	no	-6.713	+0.00
Processing: Dry Extruded	yes	-6.713	-6.71
Processing: Dry Semi Moist	no	-6.174	+0.00
Processing: Dry Muesli	no	-10.146	+0.00
Processing: Wet Pate	no	-0.672	+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunks	no	-0.672	+0.00

Processing-type offset: +0.02
Additives declared on label: +2 transparency bonus
Subtotal: 55.5
Final score: 55/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

Model	Score
v3	55/100	current
v2	56/100
v1	53/100
v1.9	54/100

Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

Nutrient	As fed (label)	Dry matter (scored)	Score
Protein	24	26.7 (band 18 to 40%)	93.6
Fat	12	13.3 (band 5.5 to 20%)	100
Fibre	2.8	3.1 (band 0.5 to 5%)	100
Calcium	1.2	1.3 (band 0.5 to 2.5%)	95
Phosphorus	0.78	0.9 (band 0.4 to 1.6%)	93.3
Calcium:phosphorus ratio	1.5	1.5 (band 1 to 2%)	100
Energy (kcal/100g)	344	382.2	100

Scored over 7 declared nutrients (combined weight 90); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.

Declared fortification: 9 nutritional additives on the label

Hierro (como carbonato de hierro (II)) 250 mg/kg
Iodo (como Ioduro potásico) 3 mg/kg
Cobre (como sulfato de cobre (II) pentahidratado) 10 mg/kg
Manganeso (como óxido manganoso) 51 mg/kg
Zinc (como óxido de zinc) 210 mg/kg
Selenio (como selenito sódico) 0,4 mg/kg
Vitamina A 20000 IU/kg
Vitamina D3 2000 IU/Kg
Vitamina E (α-Tocoferol) 115 mg/Kg

High confidence: full analysis plus minerals or omegas and declared energy.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

Item	Points
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)	10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (36.5% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)	7.3/20
✓ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory)	15/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)	10/10
✓ Energy value declared (voluntary)	5/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)	5/5
✗ Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file	0/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)	5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)	10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file	0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

Claims on file; none we can check against the label

Claim	Type	Check	Substantiation
Complete food for adult or senior dogs with severe joint pain and pain associated with their age, breed or pathology (digestive and urinary problems), including allergies and intolerances. (on page)	Functional	not checkable	Manufacturer assertion
With a high content of collagen, glucosamine, chondroitin and MSM that help prevent wear and tear on the joints. and alleviate joint pain, substantially improving the quality of life of dogs. (on page)	Functional	not checkable	Manufacturer assertion
Contribution of ingredients with analgesic and anti-inflammatory effect to alleviate discomfort and pain in the urinary tract and joints. (on page)	Functional	not checkable	Manufacturer assertion
Contains Nucleotides that strengthen intestinal function. (on page)	Functional	not checkable	Manufacturer assertion
Added vegetables and medicinal herbs improve intestinal transit, reduction of gases in digestion and the immune system. (on page)	Functional	not checkable	Manufacturer assertion
Exquisite recipe with high percentages of turkey meat and low in calories, complemented with fish oil, which incorporates high levels of Omega 3 and Omega 6. (on page)	Content	not checkable	Manufacturer assertion