Lenda Cuidados Especiales Pavo - Sin Cereales
Dry Extruded complete Clear label
Is Lenda Cuidados Especiales Pavo - Sin Cereales a good dog food?
We score it 49/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Why this score?
This recipe achieves an overall rating of 49 out of 100. The inclusion of ingredients without printed percentages contributed -7.3 points, and the processing format adjusted the score by -6.7. Conversely, the overall quality of the ingredient list added +3.7 points, while being labelled nutritionally complete contributed +2.3 points to the final evaluation.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
69% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
- Recipe49
- Nutritionallow100
- Transparency46
- Safety100
- EvidenceNot recorded
The Recipe score measures how attractive and transparent the declared ingredient list is. It is not, by itself, proof that the food is nutritionally appropriate for long-term feeding. The Nutritional and Evidence scores measure what we can verify towards that stronger claim.
Complete extruded dry food for dogs of all life stages, with dehydrated turkey protein, potato starch and pea starch as the main ingredients.
Why you might choose it
- Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
- Doesn't list grain ingredients.
- Nutritionally complete: formulated to be fed as the whole diet.
Why you might not
- Around 31% of the recipe is generic or unspecified ingredients.
- Meat makes up an estimated 4% of the dry matter (8% as fed); carbohydrates dominate.
Estimated composition
Typical analysis (as fed)
- Protein
- 26%
- Fat
- 17.50%
- Fibre
- 2.80%
- Ash
- 6%
- Calcium
- 1.70%
- Phosphorus
- 0.89%
Additives & feeding info
Nutritional additives
sulfato de condroitina 500 mg/kg; sulfato de glucosamina 500 mg/kg; MSM (Metilsulfonilmetano) 200 mg/kg; Hierro (como carbonato de hierro (II)) 195 mg/kg; Iodo (como Ioduro potásico) 2,2 mg/kg; Cobre (como sulfato de cobre (II) pentahidratado) 13 mg/kg; Manganeso (como óxido manganoso) 44,5 mg/kg; Zinc (como óxido de zinc) 185 mg/kg; Selenio (como selenito sódico) 0,33 mg/kg; Vitamina A 16000 IU/kg; Vitamina D3 1550 IU/Kg; Vitamina E (α-Tocoferol) 110 mg/Kg
Technological additives
Conservantes y antioxidantes (extractos de cítricos y tocoferoles)
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list beef, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken oil and fat
- Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists dehydrated turkey protein
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists krill
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (24)
| # | As declared | Matched | Category | Tier | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dehydrated Turkey Protein 27% | Dehydrated turkey protein | meat | good | 27 | 27.0 |
| 2 | Potato Starch | Potato starch | carb | poor | - | 4.5 |
| 3 | Pea Starch | Pea Starch | carb | poor | - | 4.4 |
| 4 | Refined Chicken Oil | Chicken Oil and Fat | oil | good | - | 4.3 |
| 5 | Peeled Peas | Peas | veg | good | - | 4.2 |
| 6 | Hydrolysed Protein | Protein Hydrolysate | other | poor | - | 4.1 |
| 7 | Krill (4%) | Krill | meat | good | 4 | 4.0 |
| 8 | Carob | Carob | fibre | medium | - | 4.0 |
| 9 | Egg | Egg | meat | good | - | 3.8 |
| 10 | Salt | Salt | additive | poor | - | 3.7 |
| 11 | Chondroitin Sulphate | Chondroitin | supplement | good | - | 3.6 |
| 12 | Glucosamine Sulphate | Glucosamine | supplement | good | - | 3.5 |
| 13 | MSM (Methylsulfonylmethane) | MSM | supplement | good | - | 3.4 |
| 14 | Seaweed Extracts | Seaweed | veg | good | - | 3.3 |
| 15 | Citrus Extracts (source of natural antioxidants) | Citric Acid | additive | medium | - | 3.2 |
| 16 | 0.01% source of inulin | Inulin | fibre | good | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| 17 | 0.01% F.O.S. fructooligosaccharides | Fructo-oligosaccharides | supplement | good | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| 18 | Mannanoligosaccharides M | Mannanoligosaccharides | supplement | good | - | 3.1 |
| 19 | Melissa officinalis | Lemon Balm | veg | good | - | 2.9 |
| 20 | Minthostachys verticillata | Minthostachys verticillata | veg | medium | - | 2.8 |
| 21 | Cinnamomum verum | Cinnamon | veg | good | - | 2.7 |
| 22 | Rosmarinus officinalis | Rosemary | veg | good | - | 2.6 |
| 23 | Gentiana | Dried Gentian Root | veg | good | - | 2.5 |
| 24 | Vaccinium macrocarpon | Cranberries | veg | good | - | 2.4 |
Brand
- Website
- https://lenda.net/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-09
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- shop.lenda.net
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-06. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.4 | 9.191 | +3.67 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 1.9% | 0.096 | +0.18 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 8.5% | -0.115 | -0.98 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 7.2% | -0.092 | -0.66 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 16.7% | -0.005 | -0.09 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 10.5% | 0.163 | +1.71 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 21.1% | -0.012 | -0.26 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 26.3% | -0.027 | -0.70 |
| Recipe graded poor | 12.7% | -0.065 | -0.82 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 3 | -0.876 | -2.63 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 4.5% | 0.060 | +0.27 |
| Undeclared quantities | 69.0% | -0.106 | -7.28 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -8.35 | 0.222 | -1.85 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.4 | 9.191 | +3.67 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 1.9% | 0.096 | +0.18 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 8.5% | -0.115 | -0.98 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 7.2% | -0.092 | -0.66 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 16.7% | -0.005 | -0.09 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 10.5% | 0.163 | +1.71 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 21.1% | -0.012 | -0.26 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 26.3% | -0.027 | -0.70 |
| Recipe graded poor | 12.7% | -0.065 | -0.82 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 3 | -0.876 | -2.63 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 4.5% | 0.060 | +0.27 |
| Undeclared quantities | 69.0% | -0.106 | -7.28 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -8.35 | 0.222 | -1.85 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 49.0
- Final score
- 49/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 26 | 28.7 (band 18 to 40%) | 99.3 |
| Fat | 17.5 | 19.3 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 2.8 | 3.1 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Calcium | 1.7 | 1.9 (band 0.5 to 2.5%) | 100 |
| Phosphorus | 0.89 | 1 (band 0.4 to 1.6%) | 99.2 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.9 | 1.9 (band 1 to 2%) | 100 |
Scored over 6 declared nutrients (combined weight 80); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.
Declared fortification: 12 nutritional additives on the label
- sulfato de condroitina 500 mg/kg
- sulfato de glucosamina 500 mg/kg
- MSM (Metilsulfonilmetano) 200 mg/kg
- Hierro (como carbonato de hierro (II)) 195 mg/kg
- Iodo (como Ioduro potásico) 2,2 mg/kg
- Cobre (como sulfato de cobre (II) pentahidratado) 13 mg/kg
- Manganeso (como óxido manganoso) 44,5 mg/kg
- Zinc (como óxido de zinc) 185 mg/kg
- Selenio (como selenito sódico) 0,33 mg/kg
- Vitamina A 16000 IU/kg
- Vitamina D3 1550 IU/Kg
- Vitamina E (α-Tocoferol) 110 mg/Kg
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (31% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 6.2/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alimento completo indicado para perros de todas las razas y recomendada para perros problemas de intolerancias a los cereales, así como atopías (problemas de piel) y digestiones difíciles (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Rico en MSM, antiinflamatorio natural ideal para paliar procesos alérgicos (picores y alteraciones de la piel) (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Las hortalizas y hierbas medicinales añadidas mejoran el tránsito intestinal, reducción de gases, la digestión y el sistema inmune (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Su alto contenido en condroprotectores, ayudan a mantener en estado óptimo articulaciones , músculos y ligamentos (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Receta monoproteica de Pavo y almidón de patatas , además de un alto contenido en Krill (4%) (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Other products from Lenda
Alternatives to Cuidados Especiales Pavo - Sin Cereales
Foods in our database that are similar on ingredients, protein, format or price. Scores and figures are from the same deterministic model used everywhere on the site.
Community
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.