Our verdict
Is Husse Light (formerly Pro Light/Senior) a good dog food?
We score it 52/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete raw food for adult dogs, with dried animal protein, wheat and wheatfeed pellets as the main ingredients.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
96% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists dried chicken protein
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists wheat
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 22% · Fat 8.50%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 22% |
| Fat | 8.50% |
| Fibre | 3.50% |
| Ash | 7.50% |
| Calcium | 1.70% |
| Phosphorus | 1% |
Energy: 358.5 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
Serve Husse food as it is or pour a little warm water over it. A bowl of fresh water should always be available to your dog. For daily ration see feeding table. Divide the daily ration into at least two meals.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
vitamin A 17500 IU; vitamin D3 1600 IU; vitamin E 130 mg; vitamin C 90 mg; 3b103 (Iron) 50 mg; 3b202 (Iodine) 1.5 mg; 3b405 (Copper) 5 mg; 3b502 (Manganese) 35 mg; 3b605 (Zinc) 65 mg; 3b801 (Selenium) 0.1 mg
Technological additives
Antioxidants
Ingredients (15)96% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- carb 33.4%
- meat 22.8%
- supplement 16.5%
- fibre 11.8%
- veg 8.8%
- oil 6.6%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | dried animal proteins | Dried Animal Protein | meat · medium | - | 9.6 |
| 2 | wheat | Wheat | carb · poor | - | 9.2 |
| 3 | wheat bran | Wheatfeed pellets | carb · poor | - | 8.8 |
| 4 | wheat meal | Wheat | carb · poor | - | 8.4 |
| 5 | maize | Maize / Corn | carb · medium | - | 8.1 |
| 6 | rice | Rice - white | carb · medium | - | 7.7 |
| 7 | dried peas | Peas | veg · good | - | 7.3 |
| 8 | dried chicken | Dried chicken protein | meat · good | - | 7.0 |
| 9 | animal fat | Unspecified Animal Fats and Oils | oil · poor | - | 6.6 |
| 10 | vegetable fibres (3%) | Vegetable fibre | fibre · medium | 3 | 3.0 |
| 11 | linseed (1.5%) | Linseed | veg · good | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| 12 | hydrolysed animal protein | Hydrolysed Animal Protein | meat · medium | - | 6.2 |
| 13 | minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 5.9 |
| 14 | glucosamine | Glucosamine | supplement · good | - | 5.5 |
| 15 | chondroitin sulphate | Chondroitin | supplement · good | - | 5.1 |
- 1. dried animal proteins9.6% estimated
- 2. wheat9.2% estimated
- 3. wheat bran8.8% estimated
- 4. wheat meal8.4% estimated
- 5. maize8.1% estimated
- 6. rice7.7% estimated
- 7. dried peas7.3% estimated
- 8. dried chicken7.0% estimated
- 9. animal fat6.6% estimated
- 10. vegetable fibres (3%)3% declared3.0% estimated
- 11. linseed (1.5%)1.5% declared1.5% estimated
- 12. hydrolysed animal protein6.2% estimated
- 13. minerals5.9% estimated
- 14. glucosamine5.5% estimated
- 15. chondroitin sulphate5.1% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-14
Brand and contact: Husse
- Website
- https://www.husse.co.uk/
- [email protected]
- Phone
- 020 7998 3439
- Address
- Unit 1, 180 Park Ave London NW10 7XH
- Contact page
- www.husse.co.uk
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-14
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.husse.co.uk
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
1 reviews on this product · 5.0/5
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The overall score for this recipe is 52 out of 100. Ingredients without printed percentages contributed -10.1 points, and the carbohydrate content contributed -3.7 points. On the positive side, the overall quality of the ingredient list added +2.4 points, and being labelled nutritionally complete contributed +2.3 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.3 | 9.191 | +2.40 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 32.6% | -0.115 | -3.75 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 7.2% | -0.092 | -0.66 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 8.8% | -0.005 | -0.05 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 16.7% | -0.012 | -0.20 |
| Recipe graded poor | 24.2% | -0.065 | -1.58 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 3 | -0.876 | -2.63 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 9.2% | 0.060 | +0.55 |
| Undeclared quantities | 95.5% | -0.106 | -10.08 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -0.20 | 0.222 | -0.04 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.12 | 33.786 | +37.84 |
| Processing: Raw | yes | -0.054 | -0.05 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.3 | 9.191 | +2.40 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 32.6% | -0.115 | -3.75 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 7.2% | -0.092 | -0.66 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 8.8% | -0.005 | -0.05 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 16.7% | -0.012 | -0.20 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 24.2% | -0.065 | -1.58 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 3 | -0.876 | -2.63 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 9.2% | 0.060 | +0.55 |
| Undeclared quantities | 95.5% | -0.106 | -10.08 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -0.20 | 0.222 | -0.04 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.12 | 33.786 | +37.84 |
| Processing: Raw | yes | -0.054 | -0.05 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -1.74
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 52.0
- Final score
- 52/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 22 | 71.4 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 8.5 | 27.6 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 3.5 | 11.4 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 58 |
| Calcium | 1.7 | 5.5 (band 0.5 to 2.5%) | 0 |
| Phosphorus | 1 | 3.2 (band 0.4 to 1.6%) | 0 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.7 | 1.7 (band 1 to 2%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 358.5 | 1164 | 100 |
Scored over 7 declared nutrients (combined weight 90); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 69.2% from the food type.
Declared fortification: 10 nutritional additives on the label
- vitamin A 17500 IU
- vitamin D3 1600 IU
- vitamin E 130 mg
- vitamin C 90 mg
- 3b103 (Iron) 50 mg
- 3b202 (Iodine) 1.5 mg
- 3b405 (Copper) 5 mg
- 3b502 (Manganese) 35 mg
- 3b605 (Zinc) 65 mg
- 3b801 (Selenium) 0.1 mg
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (4.5% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 0.9/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supports normal and healthy heart function to help keep dogs happy and active (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Contains chondroitin and glucosamine to support the health and mobility of the joints (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Contains linseed, a natural source of omega-3 fatty acids, and vitamin C to help support a healthy immune system (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Enriched with optimal content of vegetable fibres to promote satiety between meals while reducing caloric intake (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| with 22% less fat compared to Essential Complete (on page) | High/low level | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Light (formerly Pro Light/Senior)
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.