Husse Complete (formerly Pro Prima)

Raw · completeHigh meatClear label

Complete (formerly Pro Prima)
Average
our rating

Our verdict

Is Husse Complete (formerly Pro Prima) a good dog food?

We score it 49/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.

Complete raw food for adult dogs, with dried animal protein, wheat and wheatfeed pellets as the main ingredients.

How we score

Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.

96% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

Why you might choose it

  • Meat makes up an estimated 32% of the dry matter.
  • Prints ingredient percentages on the label.

Why you might not

  • 3 poor-graded ingredients make up about 34% of the recipe.
  • Needs freezer space and defrosting before serving.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
  • Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists dried chicken protein
  • Your dog avoids grain: the label lists wheat

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 25% · Fat 11%

Typical analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fed
Protein25%
Fat11%
Fibre3%
Ash7.50%
Calcium1.50%
Phosphorus1%

Additives & feeding info

Additives declared on the label

Nutritional additives

vitamin A 21000 IU/kg; vitamin D3 1950 IU/kg; vitamin E 155 mg/kg; vitamin C 90 mg/kg; 3b103 (Iron) 50 mg/kg; 3b202 (Iodine) 1.5 mg/kg; 3b405 (Copper) 5 mg/kg; 3b502 (Manganese) 35 mg/kg; 3b605 (Zinc) 65 mg/kg; 3b801 (Selenium) 0.1 mg/kg

Technological additives

tocopherol extracts from vegetable oils (1b306(i)); rosemary extract; Sepiolite 10 g/kg

Ingredients (11)96% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

  • carb 35.8%
  • meat 32.0%
  • fibre 14.4%
  • oil 9.1%
  • supplement 7.6%
  • veg 1.0%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
1dried animal proteinsDried Animal Proteinmeat · medium-13.7
2wheatWheatcarb · poor-13.0
3wheat mealWheatcarb · poor-12.2
4wheat branWheatfeed pelletscarb · poor-11.4
5maizeMaize / Corncarb · medium-10.7
6dried chickenDried chicken proteinmeat · good-9.9
7animal fatUnspecified Animal Fats and Oilsoil · poor-9.1
8vegetable fibres (3%)Vegetable fibrefibre · medium33.0
9linseed (1%)Linseedveg · good11.0
10hydrolysed animal proteinHydrolysed Animal Proteinmeat · medium-8.4
11mineralsVitamins and mineralssupplement · medium-7.6
  1. 1. dried animal proteins13.7% estimated
    Dried Animal Protein · meat · medium
  2. 2. wheat13.0% estimated
    Wheat · carb · poor
  3. 3. wheat meal12.2% estimated
    Wheat · carb · poor
  4. 4. wheat bran11.4% estimated
    Wheatfeed pellets · carb · poor
  5. 5. maize10.7% estimated
    Maize / Corn · carb · medium
  6. 6. dried chicken9.9% estimated
    Dried chicken protein · meat · good
  7. 7. animal fat9.1% estimated
  8. 8. vegetable fibres (3%)3% declared3.0% estimated
    Vegetable fibre · fibre · medium
  9. 9. linseed (1%)1% declared1.0% estimated
    Linseed · veg · good
  10. 10. hydrolysed animal protein8.4% estimated
    Hydrolysed Animal Protein · meat · medium
  11. 11. minerals7.6% estimated
    Vitamins and minerals · supplement · medium

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-14

Brand and contact: Husse
Husse logo
Phone
020 7998 3439
Address
Unit 1, 180 Park Ave London NW10 7XH
Contact page
www.husse.co.uk

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-14
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)
Product page
www.husse.co.uk

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.

1 reviews on this product · 5.0/5

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Why this score?

The overall score is 49 out of 100. Undeclared ingredient shares cost -10.1 points, and the carbohydrate content cost -4 points. Being labelled nutritionally complete added +2.3 points, while lower-quality ingredients cost -2.2 points.

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.09.191+0.27
Carb share of dry matter34.8%-0.115-4.01
Oil share of dry matter9.9%-0.092-0.91
Vegetable share of dry matter1.0%-0.005-0.01
Supplement share of dry matter7.7%-0.012-0.09
Recipe graded poor34.3%-0.065-2.23
Number of poor ingredients3-0.876-2.63
Largest single poor ingredient13.0%0.060+0.78
Undeclared quantities96.0%-0.106-10.14
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
Additive penalty-0.270.222-0.06
Processing multiplier1.1233.786+37.84
Processing: Rawyes-0.054-0.05
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.09.191+0.27
Meat share of dry matter0.0%0.096+0.00
Carb share of dry matter34.8%-0.115-4.01
Oil share of dry matter9.9%-0.092-0.91
Vegetable share of dry matter1.0%-0.005-0.01
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.163+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter7.7%-0.012-0.09
Other share of dry matter0.0%-0.375+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.027+0.00
Recipe graded poor34.3%-0.065-2.23
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.179+0.00
Number of poor ingredients3-0.876-2.63
Largest single poor ingredient13.0%0.060+0.78
Undeclared quantities96.0%-0.106-10.14
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)no0.707+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty-0.270.222-0.06
Processing multiplier1.1233.786+37.84
Processing: Rawyes-0.054-0.05
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
-1.74
Additives declared on label
+2 transparency bonus
Subtotal
49.1
Final score
49/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v349/100current
v242/100
v142/100
v1.942/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein2581.2 (band 18 to 40%)100
Fat1135.7 (band 5.5 to 20%)100
Fibre39.7 (band 0.5 to 5%)78.2
Calcium1.54.9 (band 0.5 to 2.5%)5.2
Phosphorus13.2 (band 0.4 to 1.6%)0
Calcium:phosphorus ratio1.51.5 (band 1 to 2%)100

Scored over 6 declared nutrients (combined weight 80); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 69.2% from the food type.

Declared fortification: 10 nutritional additives on the label
  • vitamin A 21000 IU/kg
  • vitamin D3 1950 IU/kg
  • vitamin E 155 mg/kg
  • vitamin C 90 mg/kg
  • 3b103 (Iron) 50 mg/kg
  • 3b202 (Iodine) 1.5 mg/kg
  • 3b405 (Copper) 5 mg/kg
  • 3b502 (Manganese) 35 mg/kg
  • 3b605 (Zinc) 65 mg/kg
  • 3b801 (Selenium) 0.1 mg/kg

Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (4% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)0.8/20
✗ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file0/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)10/10
✗ Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file0/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✗ Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file0/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)10/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

Claims on file; none we can check against the label

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
Contains linseed, a natural source of Omega-3 fatty acids, and vitamin C to help support a healthy immune system. (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Enriched with optimal content of vegetable fibres to support the digestive health and improve stool quality. (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Alternatives to Complete (formerly Pro Prima)

Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.

See all alternatives

See all products from Husse

Community0 comments

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.