Hill's Pet Nutrition Adult Single Protein Lamb & Pumpkin Recipe Fresh Dog Food Roll
Fresh Chilled · complete
Our verdict
Is Hill's Pet Nutrition Adult Single Protein Lamb & Pumpkin Recipe Fresh Dog Food Roll a good dog food?
We score it 50/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids lamb: the label lists lamb
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feeding
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed | Dry matter | Directory average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | - | 25.70% | 37.69% (137 eligible foods) |
| Fat | - | 26.60% | 23.89% (134 eligible foods) |
| Fibre | - | 3.90% | 3.81% (135 eligible foods) |
| Carbohydrates | 36.40% | 36.40% | 30.63% (76 eligible foods) |
| Omega-3 fatty acids | 0.48% | - | - |
| Omega-6 fatty acids | 2.64% | - | - |
| Calcium | 1.15% | - | - |
| Phosphorus | 0.96% | - | - |
| Sodium | 1.20% | - | - |
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Keep refrigerated at all times below 40°F / 4°C -- Do not freeze. Once opened, use within 5 days.
Feeding guide
Adult Maintenance: 5 lb - 4 oz; 10 lb - 7 oz; 20 lb - 11 oz; 30 lb - 15 oz; 40 lb - 19 oz; 50 lb - 23 oz; 60 lb - 26 oz; 80 lb - 32 oz; 100 lb - 38 oz; 120 lb - 44 oz. Cut at ounce marks, serve as slices or dice into bite-sized chunks.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin E 708 IU/kg
Ingredients (15)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 31.6%
- veg 17.1%
- additive 11.0%
- supplement 10.4%
- other 8.4%
- carb 7.8%
- fibre 7.0%
- oil 6.7%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lamb | Lamb | meat · medium | - | 8.7 |
| 2 | Water | Water | other | - | 8.4 |
| 3 | Lamb Lung | Lamb Lung | meat · medium | - | 8.1 |
| 4 | Tapioca Starch | Tapioca Starch | carb · medium | - | 7.8 |
| 5 | Lamb Liver | Lambs Liver | meat · good | - | 7.5 |
| 6 | Sheep Plasma | Plasma Protein | meat · medium | - | 7.2 |
| 7 | Powdered Cellulose | Powdered Cellulose | fibre · poor | - | 7.0 |
| 8 | Sunflower Oil | Sunflower oil | oil · good | - | 6.7 |
| 9 | Pumpkin | Pumpkin | veg · good | - | 6.4 |
| 10 | Salt | Salt | additive · poor | - | 6.1 |
| 11 | Potassium Chloride | Potassium Chloride | supplement · medium | - | 5.8 |
| 12 | Dried Chicory Root | Chicory root | veg · good | - | 5.5 |
| 13 | Celery Powder | Celery Seeds | veg · good | - | 5.2 |
| 14 | Sodium Tripolyphosphate | Sodium Tripolyphosphate | additive · poor | - | 4.9 |
| 15 | Magnesium Chloride | Magnesium Oxide | supplement · good | - | 4.6 |
- 1. Lamb8.7% estimated
- 2. Water8.4% estimated
- 3. Lamb Lung8.1% estimated
- 4. Tapioca Starch7.8% estimated
- 5. Lamb Liver7.5% estimated
- 6. Sheep Plasma7.2% estimated
- 7. Powdered Cellulose7.0% estimated
- 8. Sunflower Oil6.7% estimated
- 9. Pumpkin6.4% estimated
- 10. Salt6.1% estimated
- 11. Potassium Chloride5.8% estimated
- 12. Dried Chicory Root5.5% estimated
- 13. Celery Powder5.2% estimated
- 14. Sodium Tripolyphosphate4.9% estimated
- 15. Magnesium Chloride4.6% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-18
Brand and contact: Hill's Pet Nutrition
- Website
- https://www.hillspet.com/
- Contact page
- www.hillspet.com
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-18
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.hillspet.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 3.0/5 · 3 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The overall score comes in at 50 out of 100. Undeclared ingredient shares pulled the score down because the label lists ingredients without printed percentages, which contributed -10.6 points. The additives in the recipe gave a small lift of +3 points, though that was partly offset by the additive load, which reduced the score by -3 points. The processing format also worked against the product, contributing -2.4 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.3 | 9.191 | +2.33 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 3.6% | -0.115 | -0.42 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 12.3% | -0.092 | -1.13 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 19.7% | -0.005 | -0.10 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 18.4% | 0.163 | +3.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 17.8% | -0.012 | -0.22 |
| Recipe graded poor | 18.0% | -0.065 | -1.17 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 3 | -0.876 | -2.63 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 7.0% | 0.060 | +0.42 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -13.34 | 0.222 | -2.96 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.07 | 33.786 | +36.15 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | yes | -2.354 | -2.35 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.3 | 9.191 | +2.33 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 3.6% | -0.115 | -0.42 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 12.3% | -0.092 | -1.13 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 19.7% | -0.005 | -0.10 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 18.4% | 0.163 | +3.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 17.8% | -0.012 | -0.22 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 18.0% | -0.065 | -1.17 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 3 | -0.876 | -2.63 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 7.0% | 0.060 | +0.42 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -13.34 | 0.222 | -2.96 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.07 | 33.786 | +36.15 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | yes | -2.354 | -2.35 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -1.74
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 49.7
- Final score
- 50/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium | 1.15 | 4.3 (band 0.5 to 2.5%) | 29.6 |
| Phosphorus | 0.96 | 3.6 (band 0.4 to 1.6%) | 0 |
| Sodium | 1.2 | 4.4 (band 0.1+%) | 100 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.2 | 1.2 (band 1 to 2%) | 81.9 |
| Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3) | - | - | 100 |
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.
Scored over 5 declared nutrients (combined weight 45); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 73% from the food type.
Declared fortification: 1 nutritional additive on the label
- Vitamin E 708 IU/kg
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
50/100 · limited — 2 checkable claims: 1 consistent, 1 contradicted.
Contradicted by the label
- "high-quality single animal protein" — the declared label says otherwise on single protein.
Consistent with the label
- "complete and balanced with all the essential vitamins and minerals" — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.
7 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Limited: at least one claim contradicts the declared label, or a recent upheld ASA ruling applies.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| triple benefits for healthy digestion, radiant coat & overall health (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| with triple benefits of high digestibility for a balanced gut, omega-6 fatty acids & vitamin E for healthy skin and a science-backed formula for overall health (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| complete and balanced with all the essential vitamins and minerals (on pack) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Precisely prepared and gently steam cooked for freshness (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| high-quality single animal protein (on page) | Content | contradicted | Manufacturer assertion |
| 100% Satisfaction guarantee (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| formulated to meet the nutritional levels established by the AAFCO Dog Food Nutrient Profiles for maintenance of adult dogs (on pack) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Healthy dog food developed with our Hill's team of 200+ veterinarians, scientists and nutritionists (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| U.S. Veterinarians' #1 Recommended Brand (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Adult Single Protein Lamb & Pumpkin Recipe Fresh Dog Food Roll
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.