Our verdict
Is Different Dog Lamb Hotpot a good dog food?
We score it 92/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete frozen fresh food for dogs of all life stages, with lamb, lamb heart and lamb lung as the main ingredients.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids lamb: the label lists lamb
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists salmon oil
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
- You are limiting fat: 36.8% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 16.20% · Fat 10.50%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed | Dry matter |
|---|---|---|
| Protein | 16.20% | 56.80% |
| Fat | 10.50% | 36.80% |
| Fibre | 1.30% | 4.60% |
| Ash | 2% | 7% |
| Moisture | 71.50% | - |
Energy: 145 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
To store: Keep in the freezer.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A 2500IU; Vitamin D3 400IU; Vitamin E 50mg; Zinc (as Zinc chelate of protein hydrolysates) 18mg; Iron (as Iron (II) chelate of protein hydrolysates) 15mg; Manganese (as Manganese chelate of protein hydrolysates) 7.5mg; Iodine (as Calcium iodate, anhydrous) 0.025mg
Ingredients (16)1% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 60.0%
- veg 37.3%
- supplement 1.5%
- oil 1.2%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18.33% Lamb Mince | Lamb | meat · medium | 18.33 | 18.3 |
| 2 | 18.33% Lamb Heart | Lamb Heart | meat · good | 18.33 | 18.3 |
| 3 | 18.33% Lamb Lung | Lamb Lung | meat · medium | 18.33 | 18.3 |
| 4 | 5% Lamb Liver | Lambs Liver | meat · good | 5 | 5.0 |
| 5 | Red Cabbage (14%) | Cabbage | veg · good | 14 | 14.0 |
| 6 | Carrot (8%) | Carrots | veg · good | 8 | 8.0 |
| 7 | Parsnip (6%) | Parsnips | veg · good | 6 | 6.0 |
| 8 | Apple (5%) | Apples | veg · good | 5 | 5.0 |
| 9 | Button Mushrooms (3%) | Mushrooms | veg · good | 3 | 3.0 |
| 10 | Vitamins & Minerals | Vitamin | supplement · good | - | 1.2 |
| 11 | Scottish Salmon Oil (1.2%) | Salmon Oil | oil · good | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 12 | Sage (0.7%) | Sage | veg · good | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| 13 | Brewer's Yeast (0.3%) | Brewer's Yeast | supplement · good | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| 14 | Chia Seeds (0.3%) | Chia Seeds | veg · good | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| 15 | Kelp Seaweed (0.3%) | Seaweed | veg · good | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| 16 | Turmeric (0.02%) | Turmeric | veg · good | 0.02 | 0.02 |
- 1. 18.33% Lamb Mince18.33% declared18.3% estimated
- 2. 18.33% Lamb Heart18.33% declared18.3% estimated
- 3. 18.33% Lamb Lung18.33% declared18.3% estimated
- 4. 5% Lamb Liver5% declared5.0% estimated
- 5. Red Cabbage (14%)14% declared14.0% estimated
- 6. Carrot (8%)8% declared8.0% estimated
- 7. Parsnip (6%)6% declared6.0% estimated
- 8. Apple (5%)5% declared5.0% estimated
- 9. Button Mushrooms (3%)3% declared3.0% estimated
- 10. Vitamins & Minerals1.2% estimated
- 11. Scottish Salmon Oil (1.2%)1.2% declared1.2% estimated
- 12. Sage (0.7%)0.7% declared0.7% estimated
- 13. Brewer's Yeast (0.3%)0.3% declared0.3% estimated
- 14. Chia Seeds (0.3%)0.3% declared0.3% estimated
- 15. Kelp Seaweed (0.3%)0.3% declared0.3% estimated
- 16. Turmeric (0.02%)0.02% declared0.02% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-03
Brand and contact: Different Dog
- [email protected]
- Phone
- 01952 456 850
- Address
- Unit 3, Pioneer Park, Halesfield 18, Telford TF7 4FA
- Contact page
- www.differentdog.com
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-03
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.differentdog.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 4.8/5 · 2,568 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
We work out the score out of 100 by combining several factors. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +7.1 points, and the meat content contributed +6.3 points. The processing format had a negative effect at -2.4, while being labelled nutritionally complete contributed +2.3. Together these give a final score of 92 out of 100.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.07 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 66.1% | 0.096 | +6.34 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 4.7% | -0.092 | -0.43 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 23.9% | -0.005 | -0.12 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 5.4% | -0.012 | -0.07 |
| Undeclared quantities | 1.2% | -0.106 | -0.13 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Fresh × high meat | 1.0 | 11.084 | +11.08 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.10 | 33.786 | +37.16 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | yes | -2.354 | -2.35 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.07 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 66.1% | 0.096 | +6.34 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.115 | +0.00 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 4.7% | -0.092 | -0.43 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 23.9% | -0.005 | -0.12 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 5.4% | -0.012 | -0.07 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 1.2% | -0.106 | -0.13 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 1.0 | 11.084 | +11.08 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.10 | 33.786 | +37.16 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | yes | -2.354 | -2.35 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -1.74
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 91.7
- Final score
- 92/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 16.2 | 56.8 (band 22.894736842105264 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 10.5 | 36.8 (band 6.995614035087719 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 1.3 | 4.6 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 145 | 508.8 | 100 |
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 7 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin A 2500IU
- Vitamin D3 400IU
- Vitamin E 50mg
- Zinc (as Zinc chelate of protein hydrolysates) 18mg
- Iron (as Iron (II) chelate of protein hydrolysates) 15mg
- Manganese (as Manganese chelate of protein hydrolysates) 7.5mg
- Iodine (as Calcium iodate, anhydrous) 0.025mg
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (98.8% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 19.8/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| antioxidant-rich red cabbage (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| prebiotic parsnips (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 33% VEG & FRUIT (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 7% SUPERFOODS (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 60% LAMB (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| An immunity defender (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Chicken and beef sensitivities (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| immune support (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| gut health (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| energy (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| all life stages (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Immune-boosting (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Gut harmony inside-out (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Full of the good guys like anti-cancer properties to support long-term health and immunity (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Fibre-rich prebiotic goodness that feeds the good bacteria and keeps everything ticking along nicely (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| The breath-freshener they didn't know they needed (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Lamb is a great alternative protein for dogs with sensitivities or allergies to chicken or beef (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| rich source of dietary fats to keep energy levels properly sustained throughout the day (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| seriously rich in fibre – brilliant for intestinal health (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Human-Quality British Lamb (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Premium protein packed with iron and zinc (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Lamb Hotpot
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.