Marleybones Lush Lamb

Fresh Shelf · completeHigh meatClear label

Lush Lamb
Good
our rating

Our verdict

Is Marleybones Lush Lamb a good dog food?

We score it 72/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.

Complete shelf-stable fresh food for dogs of all life stages, with lamb, carrots and sweet potatoes as the main ingredients.

How we score

Why you might choose it

  • Meat makes up an estimated 49% of the dry matter (60% as fed).
  • Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
  • Single named animal protein: lamb.

Why you might not

  • No analytical breakdown is published.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
  • Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
  • Single named protein: lamb
  • Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

Nutrition and feeding

Typical analysis (as fed)

No analysis recorded yet.

Additives & feeding info

Feeding and storage

Storage

Marleybones is Pantry Fresh® - meals can be kept in your cupboard, no fridge or freezer space required.

No additives recorded yet.

Ingredients (11)23% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

  • meat 60.0%
  • veg 23.1%
  • supplement 9.9%
  • carb 7.0%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
1Lamb 60%Lambmeat · medium6060.0
2Carrots 6.5%Carrotsveg · good6.56.5
3Sweet Potato 4%Sweet Potatoescarb · good44.0
4Quinoa 3%Quinoacarb · good33.0
5Broccoli 1.3%Broccoliveg · good1.31.3
6Rosemary 0.8%Rosemaryveg · good0.80.8
7Chia Seeds 0.6%Chia Seedsveg · good0.60.6
8Linseeds 0.5%Linseedveg · good0.50.5
9Hemp Seed Powder 0.3%Hemp Seedsveg · good0.30.3
10Chicory RootChicory rootveg · good-13.1
11YuccaYucca Schidigerasupplement · good-9.9
  1. 1. Lamb 60%60% declared60.0% estimated
    Lamb · meat · medium
  2. 2. Carrots 6.5%6.5% declared6.5% estimated
    Carrots · veg · good
  3. 3. Sweet Potato 4%4% declared4.0% estimated
    Sweet Potatoes · carb · good
  4. 4. Quinoa 3%3% declared3.0% estimated
    Quinoa · carb · good
  5. 5. Broccoli 1.3%1.3% declared1.3% estimated
    Broccoli · veg · good
  6. 6. Rosemary 0.8%0.8% declared0.8% estimated
    Rosemary · veg · good
  7. 7. Chia Seeds 0.6%0.6% declared0.6% estimated
    Chia Seeds · veg · good
  8. 8. Linseeds 0.5%0.5% declared0.5% estimated
    Linseed · veg · good
  9. 9. Hemp Seed Powder 0.3%0.3% declared0.3% estimated
    Hemp Seeds · veg · good
  10. 10. Chicory Root13.1% estimated
    Chicory root · veg · good
  11. 11. Yucca9.9% estimated
    Yucca Schidigera · supplement · good

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-14

Brand and contact: Marleybones
Marleybones logo
Address
onditions Privacy Policy Cookie Policy © Marleybones, Marleybones Limited, 119 Marylebone Road, London, United Kingdom, NW1 5PU

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-14
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)
Product page
marleybones.com

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Why this score?

We scored this product at 72 out of 100. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +6.8 points, while the meat content added a further +4.7 points. On the downside, ingredients without printed percentages deducted -2.4 points and the carbohydrate content cost -1.2 points.

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.79.191+6.76
Meat share of dry matter49.4%0.096+4.74
Carb share of dry matter10.7%-0.115-1.23
Vegetable share of dry matter13.3%-0.005-0.07
Supplement share of dry matter26.6%-0.012-0.33
Undeclared quantities23.0%-0.106-2.43
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes0.707+0.71
Processing multiplier1.0033.786+33.79
Processing: Fresh Shelfyes-0.672-0.67
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.79.191+6.76
Meat share of dry matter49.4%0.096+4.74
Carb share of dry matter10.7%-0.115-1.23
Oil share of dry matter0.0%-0.092+0.00
Vegetable share of dry matter13.3%-0.005-0.07
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.163+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter26.6%-0.012-0.33
Other share of dry matter0.0%-0.375+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.027+0.00
Recipe graded poor0.0%-0.065+0.00
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.179+0.00
Number of poor ingredients0-0.876+0.00
Largest single poor ingredient0.0%0.060+0.00
Undeclared quantities23.0%-0.106-2.43
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietno2.294+0.00
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes0.707+0.71
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)no-3.158+0.00
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty0.000.222+0.00
Processing multiplier1.0033.786+33.79
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfyes-0.672-0.67
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
-0.08
Subtotal
72.1
Final score
72/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v372/100current
v274/100
v173/100
v1.975/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

Analytical constituents not declared

No nutritional additives section declared on the label.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (77% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)15.4/20
✗ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file0/15
✗ Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file0/10
✗ Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file0/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✗ Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file0/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)10/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Additives declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

100/100 · strong — 3 checkable claims: 3 consistent, 0 contradicted.

Consistent with the label

  • "No grains, fillers, preservatives or artificial additives" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
  • "Grain-free." — supported by the declared grain-free data.
  • "Zero buckwheat and grains." — supported by the declared grain-free data.

12 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.

Strong: at least three checkable claims, all consistent with the declared label, and no compliance cap.

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
Real food for more great years (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Made for Sensitive Stomachs (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
With gut-friendly prebiotics, like chicory root, for easy digestion. (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Expertly formulated to support dental, gut and joint health. (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Made with natural, science-backed ingredients for targeted support. (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Pantry Fresh® dog food made with real meat, veggies, superfoods, and gut-friendly prebiotics. (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
High quality meat, garden veggies and superfoods. (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Made with high-quality British meat - chicken, beef or lamb. (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
No Artifical Additives (on page)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion
No grains, fillers, preservatives or artificial additives (on page)Free-fromconsistentManufacturer assertion
Zero Preservatives (on page)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion
at least 60% freshly prepared meat or fish in every meal (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Grain-free. (on page)Free-fromconsistentManufacturer assertion
Zero buckwheat and grains. (on page)Free-fromconsistentManufacturer assertion
Low Calorie (on page)High/low levelnot checkableManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Alternatives to Lush Lamb

Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.

See all alternatives

See all products from Marleybones

Community0 comments

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.