Harrington's Chicken With Potato & Vegetables Wet Puppy Food
Wet Chunks · completeHigh meatClear label
Our verdict
Is Harrington's Chicken With Potato & Vegetables Wet Puppy Food a good dog food?
We score it 75/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete wet food in chunks for puppies, with chicken, potatoes and carrots as the main ingredients.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for puppies
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists salmon oil
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
- You are limiting fat: 35.4% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 9% · Fat 8.50%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 9% |
| Fat | 8.50% |
| Fibre | 0.50% |
| Ash | 2.50% |
| Moisture | 76% |
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
Feeding Guide Expected Adult body weight 2-4 months g/day between 4 meals 4-8 months g/day between 3 or 4 meals 8-12 months g/day between 3 meals Extra small dog (3-5kgs) 190-270g 220-300g 280-400g Small dog (5-10kgs 270-400g 315-500g 440-640g Medium dog (10-25kgs) 440-800g 500-920g 650-1200g Large dog (25-40kgs) 800-1100g 920-1260g 1200-1600g Extra-large dog (40kgs+) 1100g+ 1260g+ 1600g+ Feeding Calculator Find out how much Chicken with Potato & Vegetables Grain Free Wet Puppy Food 8 x 380g
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A 3000 IU; Vitamin D3 420 IU; Vitamin E 40 mg; Zinc 38.5 mg; Iron 20 mg; Manganese 3.75 mg; Copper 2.7 mg; Iodine 0.39 mg; Selenium 0.04 mg
Technological additives
Cassia Gum 2500 mg
Ingredients (8)15% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 65.0%
- veg 10.0%
- carb 10.0%
- supplement 8.5%
- oil 6.4%
- fibre 0.1%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chicken (65%) | Chicken | meat · medium | 65 | 65.0 |
| 2 | Potato (10%) | Potatoes | carb · medium | 10 | 10.0 |
| 3 | Carrots (5%) | Carrots | veg · good | 5 | 5.0 |
| 4 | Peas (5%) | Peas | veg · good | 5 | 5.0 |
| 5 | Minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 8.5 |
| 6 | Salmon Oil | Salmon Oil | oil · good | - | 6.4 |
| 7 | Chicory Root Extract (0.05%) | Chicory Root Extract | fibre · good | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| 8 | Yucca Extract (0.005%) | Yucca Schidigera | supplement · good | 0.005 | 0.01 |
- 1. Chicken (65%)65% declared65.0% estimated
- 2. Potato (10%)10% declared10.0% estimated
- 3. Carrots (5%)5% declared5.0% estimated
- 4. Peas (5%)5% declared5.0% estimated
- 5. Minerals8.5% estimated
- 6. Salmon Oil6.4% estimated
- 7. Chicory Root Extract (0.05%)0.05% declared0.05% estimated
- 8. Yucca Extract (0.005%)0.005% declared0.01% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-28
Brand and contact: Harrington's
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-28
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.harringtonspetfood.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
We scored this product 75 out of 100, drawing on several factors. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +5.6 points, while the meat content added +4.8 points. Being labelled nutritionally complete gave +2.3, and printing percentages for most of the recipe contributed +2.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.59 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 49.9% | 0.096 | +4.79 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 6.9% | -0.115 | -0.79 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 17.4% | -0.092 | -1.60 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 4.1% | -0.005 | -0.02 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 21.6% | -0.012 | -0.26 |
| Undeclared quantities | 14.9% | -0.106 | -1.58 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.59 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 49.9% | 0.096 | +4.79 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 6.9% | -0.115 | -0.79 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 17.4% | -0.092 | -1.60 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 4.1% | -0.005 | -0.02 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 21.6% | -0.012 | -0.26 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 14.9% | -0.106 | -1.58 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 75.1
- Final score
- 75/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for puppies and growth. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Scored against FEDIAF growth minima; puppy scoring is under review.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 9 | 37.5 | 100 |
| Fat | 8.5 | 35.4 | 100 |
Scored over 2 declared nutrients (combined weight 40); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 9 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin A 3000 IU
- Vitamin D3 420 IU
- Vitamin E 40 mg
- Zinc 38.5 mg
- Iron 20 mg
- Manganese 3.75 mg
- Copper 2.7 mg
- Iodine 0.39 mg
- Selenium 0.04 mg
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (85.1% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 17/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
67/100 · limited — 3 checkable claims: 2 consistent, 1 contradicted.
Contradicted by the label
- "Single Protein" — the declared label says otherwise on single protein.
Consistent with the label
- "Grain Free" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
- "contains no wheat, dairy, soya or pork" — supported by the declared pork data.
6 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Limited: at least one claim contradicts the declared label, or a recent upheld ASA ruling applies.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hypoallergenic (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| pre-biotics to support gut health (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| salmon oil to promote a healthy skin & coat (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Carbon Negative Production (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Single Protein (on page) | Content | contradicted | Manufacturer assertion |
| Natural Ingredients (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| packed with 93% freshly prepared chicken & veg (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Grain Free (on page) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| contains no wheat, dairy, soya or pork (on page) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Chicken With Potato & Vegetables Wet Puppy Food
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.