Dr. Clauder's Hypoallergen Diät

Wet Pate · complete

Hypoallergen Diät
Average
our rating

Our verdict

Is Dr. Clauder's Hypoallergen Diät a good dog food?

We score it 55/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.

Complete wet paté food for dogs of all life stages, with salmon, potatoes and linseed oil as the main ingredients.

How we score

100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

Why you might choose it

  • Single named animal protein: fish.
  • Doesn't list grain ingredients.
  • High in protein: 38% protein on a dry-matter basis.

Why you might not

  • High in fat: 42% fat on a dry-matter basis.
  • Meat makes up an estimated 0% of the dry matter; carbohydrates dominate.
  • 100% of the recipe mass has no printed percentage, so the exact split cannot be verified.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
  • Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
  • Single named protein: fish
  • Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • You are limiting fat: 42.4% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 8% · Fat 8.90%

Typical analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fed
Protein8%
Fat8.90%
Fibre0.50%
Ash0.60%
Moisture79%
Omega-3 fatty acids0.65%
Omega-6 fatty acids0.60%
Calcium0.18%
Phosphorus0.15%

Additives & feeding info

Additives declared on the label

Nutritional additives

Vitamin A 5000 IE; Vitamin D3 500 IE; Vitamin E 150 mg; Taurin 650 mg; Methionin 2000 mg

Technological additives

Kaliumcitrat 4000 mg; Cassia Gum 1000 mg

Ingredients (5)100% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

  • oil 46.2%
  • carb 30.8%
  • supplement 23.1%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
1SalmonSalmonmeat · good-25.0
2PotatoPotatoescarb · medium-22.5
3Linseed oilLinseed oiloil · good-20.0
4Calcium carbonateCalcium Carbonatesupplement · medium-17.5
5Borage oilBorage oiloil · good-15.0
  1. 1. Salmon25.0% estimated
    Salmon · meat · good
  2. 2. Potato22.5% estimated
    Potatoes · carb · medium
  3. 3. Linseed oil20.0% estimated
    Linseed oil · oil · good
  4. 4. Calcium carbonate17.5% estimated
    Calcium Carbonate · supplement · medium
  5. 5. Borage oil15.0% estimated
    Borage oil · oil · good

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-08-22

Brand and contact: Dr. Clauder's

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-08-22
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)
Product page
www.dr-clauder.com

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Why this score?

This recipe achieves an overall score of 55 out of 100 based on several key factors. The presence of ingredients without printed percentages reduced the score by -10.6. Conversely, the overall quality of the ingredient list added +7.4 to the total. Additionally, the oil and fat content lowered the score by -5.6, while being labelled nutritionally complete contributed +2.3.

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.89.191+7.41
Carb share of dry matter10.3%-0.115-1.19
Oil share of dry matter61.2%-0.092-5.64
Supplement share of dry matter28.5%-0.012-0.35
Undeclared quantities100.0%-0.106-10.56
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
Processing multiplier1.0033.786+33.79
Processing: Wet Pateyes-0.672-0.67
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.89.191+7.41
Meat share of dry matter0.0%0.096+0.00
Carb share of dry matter10.3%-0.115-1.19
Oil share of dry matter61.2%-0.092-5.64
Vegetable share of dry matter0.0%-0.005+0.00
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.163+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter28.5%-0.012-0.35
Other share of dry matter0.0%-0.375+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.027+0.00
Recipe graded poor0.0%-0.065+0.00
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.179+0.00
Number of poor ingredients0-0.876+0.00
Largest single poor ingredient0.0%0.060+0.00
Undeclared quantities100.0%-0.106-10.56
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)no0.707+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty0.000.222+0.00
Processing multiplier1.0033.786+33.79
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateyes-0.672-0.67
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
-0.08
Additives declared on label
+2 transparency bonus
Subtotal
54.8
Final score
55/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v355/100current
v257/100
v156/100
v1.957/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein838.1 (band 18 to 40%)100
Fat8.942.4 (band 5.5 to 20%)100
Fibre0.52.4 (band 0.5 to 5%)95.1
Calcium0.180.9 (band 0.5 to 2.5%)80.7
Phosphorus0.150.7 (band 0.4 to 1.6%)85.7
Calcium:phosphorus ratio1.21.2 (band 1 to 2%)82
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3)--100

Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.

Scored over 7 declared nutrients (combined weight 90); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.

Declared fortification: 5 nutritional additives on the label
  • Vitamin A 5000 IE
  • Vitamin D3 500 IE
  • Vitamin E 150 mg
  • Taurin 650 mg
  • Methionin 2000 mg

Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✗ Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file0/20
✓ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory)15/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)10/10
✗ Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file0/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✗ Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file0/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

Claims on file; none we can check against the label

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
Nachhaltige Produktion in Deutschland ... am Niederrhein (on page)provenancenot checkableManufacturer assertion
Futterunverträglichkeiten - Ideal für Katzen mit speziellen Ernährungsbedürfnissen. (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Essentielle Nährstoffe - Reich an Omega-3 und Omega-6 Fettsäuren. (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
reduziert Unverträglichkeiten gegenüber bestimmten Nährstoffen (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
trägt zur Linderung von Futtermittelintoleranzen bei (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Futtermittel für besondere Ernährungszwecke für Katzen (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Hochwertige Zutaten - Enthält Lachs und Borretschöl für beste Verträglichkeit. (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Alternatives to Hypoallergen Diät

Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.

See all alternatives

See all products from Dr. Clauder's

Community0 comments

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.