Dr. Clauder's Basic Nature Whole Food Croc

Dry Extruded · complete

Basic Nature Whole Food Croc
Poor
our rating

Our verdict

Is Dr. Clauder's Basic Nature Whole Food Croc a good dog food?

We score it 34/100 (Poor). The main reasons are set out in "Why you might not" below, and every step of the calculation is shown under "How we calculated this score".

Complete extruded dry food for adult dogs, with barley, wheat and pork protein and beef protein as the main ingredients.

How we score

Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.

100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

Why you might choose it

  • Nutritionally complete: formulated to be fed as the whole diet.

Why you might not

  • 5 poor-graded ingredients make up about 40% of the recipe.
  • 100% of the recipe mass has no printed percentage, so the exact split cannot be verified.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
  • Doesn't list lamb, fish, venison, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists dehydrated poultry proteins
  • Your dog avoids beef: the label lists pork protein and beef protein
  • Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists dehydrated poultry proteins
  • Your dog avoids pork: the label lists pork protein and beef protein
  • Your dog avoids grain: the label lists barley
  • You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 24% · Fat 10%

Typical analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fed
Protein24%
Fat10%
Fibre3%
Ash8%
Calcium1.60%
Phosphorus1.15%
Sodium0.30%

Additives & feeding info

Feeding and storage

Storage

Protect from moisture! Store in a cool, dry place!

Feeding guide

Body weight g/day 2.5kg-5kg 60g-95g 7.5kg-10kg 130g-165g 12.5kg-15kg 195g-220g 17.5kg-20kg 250g-275g 22.5kg-25kg 300g-325g 30kg-35kg 370g-415g 40kg-45kg 460g-505g 50kg-60kg 545g-625g 70kg-80kg 700g-725g 90kg-100kg 845g-915g

Additives declared on the label

Nutritional additives

Vitamin A 15,000 IU; Vitamin D3 1,500 IU; Vitamin E 85mg; copper (as copper(II) sulfate, pentahydrate) 12mg; zinc (as zinc oxide) 85mg; iodine (as calcium iodate, anhydrous) 2.5mg; selenium (as sodium selenite) 0.25mg

Technological additives

Antioxidants

Ingredients (13)100% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

  • carb 28.8%
  • supplement 18.1%
  • meat 16.9%
  • fibre 8.5%
  • oil 7.7%
  • other 7.3%
  • veg 6.5%
  • additive 6.2%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
1BarleyBarleycarb · medium-10.0
2wheatWheatcarb · poor-9.6
3wheat flourWheatcarb · poor-9.2
4pork protein and beef proteinPork Protein and Beef Proteinmeat · medium-8.8
5wheat semolina branWheat Semolina Branfibre · medium-8.5
6poultry proteinDehydrated Poultry Proteinsmeat · good-8.1
7animal fatUnspecified Animal Fats and Oilsoil · poor-7.7
8protein hydrolysateProtein Hydrolysateother · poor-7.3
9dried yeastYeastsupplement · good-6.9
10dried peasPeasveg · good-6.5
11sodium chlorideSaltadditive · poor-6.2
12calcium carbonateCalcium Carbonatesupplement · medium-5.8
13potassium chloridePotassium Chloridesupplement · medium-5.4
  1. 1. Barley10.0% estimated
    Barley · carb · medium
  2. 2. wheat9.6% estimated
    Wheat · carb · poor
  3. 3. wheat flour9.2% estimated
    Wheat · carb · poor
  4. 4. pork protein and beef protein8.8% estimated
  5. 5. wheat semolina bran8.5% estimated
    Wheat Semolina Bran · fibre · medium
  6. 6. poultry protein8.1% estimated
  7. 7. animal fat7.7% estimated
  8. 8. protein hydrolysate7.3% estimated
    Protein Hydrolysate · other · poor
  9. 9. dried yeast6.9% estimated
    Yeast · supplement · good
  10. 10. dried peas6.5% estimated
    Peas · veg · good
  11. 11. sodium chloride6.2% estimated
    Salt · additive · poor
  12. 12. calcium carbonate5.8% estimated
    Calcium Carbonate · supplement · medium
  13. 13. potassium chloride5.4% estimated
    Potassium Chloride · supplement · medium

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-09

Brand and contact: Dr. Clauder's

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-09
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)
Product page
www.dr-clauder.com

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Why this score?

The overall score came in at 34 out of 100, after several negative factors weighed against the product. Ingredients without printed percentages contributed -10.6 points, while the processing format took off -6.7. The carbohydrate content reduced the score by -3.6, and lower-quality ingredients cost a further -2.6 points.

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality-0.09.191-0.09
Carb share of dry matter31.0%-0.115-3.57
Oil share of dry matter9.2%-0.092-0.85
Vegetable share of dry matter7.1%-0.005-0.04
Additive share of dry matter6.7%0.163+1.09
Supplement share of dry matter20.2%-0.012-0.25
Other share of dry matter4.4%-0.375-1.66
Recipe graded poor40.0%-0.065-2.60
Number of poor ingredients5-0.876-4.38
Largest single poor ingredient9.6%0.060+0.58
Undeclared quantities100.0%-0.106-10.56
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
Additive penalty-7.740.222-1.72
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality-0.09.191-0.09
Meat share of dry matter0.0%0.096+0.00
Carb share of dry matter31.0%-0.115-3.57
Oil share of dry matter9.2%-0.092-0.85
Vegetable share of dry matter7.1%-0.005-0.04
Additive share of dry matter6.7%0.163+1.09
Supplement share of dry matter20.2%-0.012-0.25
Other share of dry matter4.4%-0.375-1.66
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.027+0.00
Recipe graded poor40.0%-0.065-2.60
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.179+0.00
Number of poor ingredients5-0.876-4.38
Largest single poor ingredient9.6%0.060+0.58
Undeclared quantities100.0%-0.106-10.56
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)no0.707+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty-7.740.222-1.72
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
+0.02
Additives declared on label
+2 transparency bonus
Subtotal
34.4
Final score
34/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v334/100current
v237/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein2426.5 (band 18 to 40%)93.2
Fat1011 (band 5.5 to 20%)93
Fibre33.3 (band 0.5 to 5%)100
Calcium1.61.8 (band 0.5 to 2.5%)100
Phosphorus1.151.3 (band 0.4 to 1.6%)100
Sodium0.30.3 (band 0.1+%)100
Calcium:phosphorus ratio1.41.4 (band 1 to 2%)93.5

Scored over 7 declared nutrients (combined weight 85); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.

Declared fortification: 7 nutritional additives on the label
  • Vitamin A 15,000 IU
  • Vitamin D3 1,500 IU
  • Vitamin E 85mg
  • copper (as copper(II) sulfate, pentahydrate) 12mg
  • zinc (as zinc oxide) 85mg
  • iodine (as calcium iodate, anhydrous) 2.5mg
  • selenium (as sodium selenite) 0.25mg

Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✗ Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file0/20
✗ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file0/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)10/10
✗ Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file0/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✓ Feeding guidance given (mandatory)10/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

Claims on file; none we can check against the label

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
for dogs with a normal and active lifestyle (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Complete food for all dog breeds (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Alternatives to Basic Nature Whole Food Croc

Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.

See all alternatives

See all products from Dr. Clauder's

Community0 comments

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.