Cobbydog Tiny Chops Cold Pressed
Dry Cold Pressed · completeHigh meatClear label
Our verdict
Is Cobbydog Tiny Chops Cold Pressed a good dog food?
We score it 66/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete cold-pressed dry food for dogs of all life stages, with chicken, sweet potatoes and peas as the main ingredients.
53% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken
- Your dog avoids duck: the label lists duck
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 32% · Fat 9%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 32% |
| Fat | 9% |
| Fibre | 3% |
| Ash | 9% |
| Moisture | 9.50% |
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
creating a highly palatable complete dry dog food
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin a 15000 IU, Vitamin D3 2000 IU, Vitamin E 50 IU, Vitamin B1 (Thiamine) 3mg, Vitamin B2 (Riboflavin) 8mg, Vitamin B6 5mg, Vitamin B12 40mcg, Vitamin C 50mg, Vitamin K 2mg, Zinc 100mg, Manganese 80mg, Copper 15mg, Iron 30mg.
Ingredients (19)53% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 43.0%
- veg 34.9%
- oil 8.4%
- supplement 4.8%
- carb 4.6%
- fibre 4.3%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dried Ground Chicken 42% | Chicken | meat · medium | 42 | 42.0 |
| 2 | Sweet Potato | Sweet Potatoes | carb · good | - | 4.6 |
| 3 | Peas | Peas | veg · good | - | 4.5 |
| 4 | Beet Pulp | Beet Pulp | fibre · medium | - | 4.3 |
| 5 | Chicken Oil 3.3% | Chicken Oil and Fat | oil · good | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| 6 | Vitamins | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 4.2 |
| 7 | Dried Ground Duck 1% | Duck | meat · medium | 1 | 1.0 |
| 8 | Turmeraid 0.6% | Turmeraid | supplement · good | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| 9 | Carrot | Carrots | veg · good | - | 4.0 |
| 10 | Chicory | Chicory | veg · good | - | 3.8 |
| 11 | Dried Fruit (Apple) | Fruit | veg · medium | - | 3.7 |
| 12 | Seaweed | Seaweed | veg · good | - | 3.5 |
| 13 | Fennel | Fennel | veg · good | - | 3.4 |
| 14 | Nettle | Nettles | veg · good | - | 3.2 |
| 15 | Sage | Sage | veg · good | - | 3.1 |
| 16 | Thyme | Thyme | veg · good | - | 2.9 |
| 17 | Oregano | Oregano | veg · good | - | 2.8 |
| 18 | Linseed Oil | Linseed oil | oil · good | - | 2.6 |
| 19 | Rapeseed Oil | Rapeseed oil | oil · good | - | 2.5 |
- 1. Dried Ground Chicken 42%42% declared42.0% estimated
- 2. Sweet Potato4.6% estimated
- 3. Peas4.5% estimated
- 4. Beet Pulp4.3% estimated
- 5. Chicken Oil 3.3%3.3% declared3.3% estimated
- 6. Vitamins4.2% estimated
- 7. Dried Ground Duck 1%1% declared1.0% estimated
- 8. Turmeraid 0.6%0.6% declared0.6% estimated
- 9. Carrot4.0% estimated
- 10. Chicory3.8% estimated
- 11. Dried Fruit (Apple)3.7% estimated
- 12. Seaweed3.5% estimated
- 13. Fennel3.4% estimated
- 14. Nettle3.2% estimated
- 15. Sage3.1% estimated
- 16. Thyme2.9% estimated
- 17. Oregano2.8% estimated
- 18. Linseed Oil2.6% estimated
- 19. Rapeseed Oil2.5% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-14
Brand and contact: Cobbydog
- Website
- https://cobbydog.com/
- Phone
- 01535 681927
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-14
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.cobbydog.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This product scores 66 out of 100. The processing format contributed -6.7 points, while the overall quality of the ingredient list added +5.6. The meat content gave a further boost of +5.6. Ingredients without printed percentages held the score back by -5.6.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.64 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 58.2% | 0.096 | +5.59 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 1.7% | -0.115 | -0.20 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 12.2% | -0.092 | -1.12 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 15.7% | -0.005 | -0.08 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 6.4% | -0.012 | -0.08 |
| Undeclared quantities | 53.1% | -0.106 | -5.61 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.64 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 58.2% | 0.096 | +5.59 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 1.7% | -0.115 | -0.20 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 12.2% | -0.092 | -1.12 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 15.7% | -0.005 | -0.08 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 6.4% | -0.012 | -0.08 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 53.1% | -0.106 | -5.61 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 66.1
- Final score
- 66/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 32 | 35.4 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 9 | 9.9 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 88.4 |
| Fibre | 3 | 3.3 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
Scored over 3 declared nutrients (combined weight 50); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 1 nutritional additive on the label
- Vitamin a 15000 IU, Vitamin D3 2000 IU, Vitamin E 50 IU, Vitamin B1 (Thiamine) 3mg, Vitamin B2 (Riboflavin) 8mg, Vitamin B6 5mg, Vitamin B12 40mcg, Vitamin C 50mg, Vitamin K 2mg, Zinc 100mg, Manganese 80mg, Copper 15mg, Iron 30mg.
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (46.9% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 9.4/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "Suitable for dogs avoiding gluten, rice and grains" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
15 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| support general wellbeing and normal physiological function (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| help support the body’s ability to manage oxidative stress and maintain normal cellular health (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| help support a healthy gut environment, contributing to normal digestion and overall vitality (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| support the natural processes that help maintain healthy skin and a glossy, well-conditioned coat (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| help neutralise free radicals in the body, which can potentially damage cellular structures (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| help support the availability of curcumin and other plant-based compounds within the body (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| help support a healthy digestive environment and contribute to normal gut function (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| help support normal stool odour (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| help support digestive wellbeing and overall balance (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| complete dry dog food (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Made with 100% natural ingredients (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Made with high-quality natural ingredients (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Suitable for dogs avoiding gluten, rice and grains (on page) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| contains no chemical additives, artificial colours, artificial flavourings, added sugars or preservatives (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| provide nutritional support for joint comfort, mobility, and healthy skin and coat condition (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| provide a natural source of omega-3 fatty acids, which support overall wellbeing and help maintain healthy skin and coat condition (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Tiny Chops Cold Pressed
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.