Burgess Adult Dog Food Rich in Salmon
Dry Extruded · completeClear label
Our verdict
Is Burgess Adult Dog Food Rich in Salmon a good dog food?
We score it 45/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete extruded dry food for adult dogs, with wheat, salmon protein and whole as the main ingredients.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
80% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Doesn't list beef, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists poultry
- Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists poultry
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists salmon protein
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists wheat
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 23.50% · Fat 10%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 23.50% |
| Fat | 10% |
| Fibre | 3% |
| Ash | 8.50% |
| Calcium | 1.60% |
| Phosphorus | 0.90% |
Energy: 353 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
Introduce Burgess Supadog Rich in Salmon dog food to your dog by gradually mixing in the new food with the old over a period of 7-10 days until the new food completely replaces the old diet. Always ensure you are monitoring your dog’s body condition to ensure a healthy weight. Remember to take treats into account when working out your dog’s daily feeding requirements. Always ensure fresh clean water is available for your dog.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A 19,630 IU/kg; Vitamin D3 1,470 IU/kg; Vitamin E 100 mg/kg; Zinc (as Zinc sulphate monohydrate) 100 mg/kg; Iron (as Iron (II) sulphate monohydrate) 40 mg/kg; Manganese (as Manganese (II) oxide) 10 mg/kg; Copper (as Copper (II) sulphate pentahydrate) 5 mg/kg; Iodine (as Calcium iodate anhydrous) 1 mg/kg; Selenium (as Sodium selenite) 0.1 mg/kg
Ingredients (16)80% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- carb 41.6%
- meat 22.1%
- supplement 12.3%
- fibre 8.1%
- veg 8.0%
- oil 7.9%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wholegrain Wheat | Wheat | carb · poor | - | 8.0 |
| 2 | Salmon Meal (16%) | Salmon Protein | meat · good | 16 | 16.0 |
| 3 | Wholegrain Maize | Whole-Grain Maize | carb · medium | - | 7.7 |
| 4 | Dried Peas | Peas | veg · good | - | 7.4 |
| 5 | Maize Gluten Meal | Maize gluten | carb · poor | - | 7.1 |
| 6 | Poultry Fat | Poultry Fat | oil · medium | - | 6.8 |
| 7 | Wheat Feed | Wheat feed | carb · poor | - | 6.5 |
| 8 | Dried Beet Pulp (3%) | Beet Pulp | fibre · medium | 3 | 3.0 |
| 9 | Minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 6.2 |
| 10 | Poultry Gravy | Poultry | meat · medium | - | 5.9 |
| 11 | Yeast (Brewer’s Yeast and Grains) | Yeast | supplement · good | - | 5.6 |
| 12 | Soya Bean Meal Feed | Soya | carb · poor | - | 5.3 |
| 13 | Dehulled | unmatched | - | - | 4.9 |
| 14 | Fish Oil (0.7%) | Fish Oil | oil · good | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| 15 | Chicory Root Extract (as a source of Fructo-oligosaccharides (Prebiotic FOS0.2%)) | Chicory Root Extract | fibre · good | - | 4.6 |
| 16 | Oat Feed | Oat Feed | carb · medium | - | 4.3 |
- 1. Wholegrain Wheat8.0% estimated
- 2. Salmon Meal (16%)16% declared16.0% estimated
- 3. Wholegrain Maize7.7% estimated
- 4. Dried Peas7.4% estimated
- 5. Maize Gluten Meal7.1% estimated
- 6. Poultry Fat6.8% estimated
- 7. Wheat Feed6.5% estimated
- 8. Dried Beet Pulp (3%)3% declared3.0% estimated
- 9. Minerals6.2% estimated
- 10. Poultry Gravy5.9% estimated
- 11. Yeast (Brewer’s Yeast and Grains)5.6% estimated
- 12. Soya Bean Meal Feed5.3% estimated
- 13. Dehulled4.9% estimated
- 14. Fish Oil (0.7%)0.7% declared0.7% estimated
- 15. Chicory Root Extract (as a source of Fructo-oligosaccharides (Prebiotic FOS0.2%))4.6% estimated
- 16. Oat Feed4.3% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-12
Brand and contact: Burgess
- Contact page
- burgesspetcare.co.uk
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-12
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.burgesspetcare.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves an overall score of 45 out of 100. Being labelled nutritionally complete adds +2.3 points to the total. However, ingredients without printed percentages deducts -8.5, the processing format takes away -6.7, and the carbohydrate content reduces the score by -5.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.2 | 9.191 | +1.89 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 17.2% | 0.096 | +1.65 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 43.0% | -0.115 | -4.95 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 9.2% | -0.092 | -0.84 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 8.4% | -0.005 | -0.04 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 13.2% | -0.012 | -0.16 |
| Recipe graded poor | 28.6% | -0.065 | -1.86 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 4 | -0.876 | -3.50 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 8.7% | 0.060 | +0.52 |
| Undeclared quantities | 80.3% | -0.106 | -8.48 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Additive penalty | -0.23 | 0.222 | -0.05 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.2 | 9.191 | +1.89 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 17.2% | 0.096 | +1.65 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 43.0% | -0.115 | -4.95 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 9.2% | -0.092 | -0.84 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 8.4% | -0.005 | -0.04 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 13.2% | -0.012 | -0.16 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 28.6% | -0.065 | -1.86 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 4 | -0.876 | -3.50 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 8.7% | 0.060 | +0.52 |
| Undeclared quantities | 80.3% | -0.106 | -8.48 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -0.23 | 0.222 | -0.05 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 44.8
- Final score
- 45/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 23.5 | 26 (band 18 to 40%) | 91.7 |
| Fat | 10 | 11 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 93 |
| Fibre | 3 | 3.3 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Calcium | 1.6 | 1.8 (band 0.5 to 2.5%) | 100 |
| Phosphorus | 0.9 | 1 (band 0.4 to 1.6%) | 99.7 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.8 | 1.8 (band 1 to 2%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 353 | 390.1 | 100 |
Scored over 7 declared nutrients (combined weight 90); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.
Declared fortification: 9 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin A 19,630 IU/kg
- Vitamin D3 1,470 IU/kg
- Vitamin E 100 mg/kg
- Zinc (as Zinc sulphate monohydrate) 100 mg/kg
- Iron (as Iron (II) sulphate monohydrate) 40 mg/kg
- Manganese (as Manganese (II) oxide) 10 mg/kg
- Copper (as Copper (II) sulphate pentahydrate) 5 mg/kg
- Iodine (as Calcium iodate anhydrous) 1 mg/kg
- Selenium (as Sodium selenite) 0.1 mg/kg
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (19.7% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 3.9/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| highly digestible ingredients (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Suitable for all breeds (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| high-quality recipes (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Supports healthy digestion (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Supports healthy skin and coat (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| No added artificial colours, flavours, or preservatives. (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Specially formulated to be suitable for all breeds. (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Zinc and Fish Oil to support skin and coat health. (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Made with prebiotics to help support healthy digestion. (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Adult Dog Food Rich in Salmon
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.