Our verdict
Is Benevo Duo Vegan Cat and Dog Food a good dog food?
We score it 53/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete wet paté food for dogs of all life stages, with sweet potatoes, carrots and oat groats as the main ingredients.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists oat groats
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 7% · Fat 2%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 7% |
| Fat | 2% |
| Fibre | 3% |
| Ash | 2% |
| Moisture | 76% |
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Storage Store in a cool (<22’C) and dry place. Away from heat, moisture and direct sunlight. After opening, keep the tin covered and refrigerated for maximum of 2 days.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A 6610 IU; Vitamin D3 397 IU; Manganese (as Manganese Sulphate Monohydrate) 4 mg; Manganese (as Manganese Chelate of Protein Hydrolysates) 0.4 mg; Iron (as Iron (II) Sulphate Monohydrate) 40 mg; Zinc (as Zinc Sulphate Monohydrate) 62 mg; Zinc (as Zinc Chelate of Protein Hydrolysates) 9 mg; Copper (as Copper Sulphate (II) Pentahydrate) 4 mg; Copper (as Copper (II) Chelate of Protein Hydrolysates) 0.6 mg; Iodine (as Potassium Iodide) 0.8 mg; Taurine 1250 mg
Ingredients (11)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- veg 50.8%
- carb 32.1%
- oil 10.2%
- supplement 7.0%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sweet Potato | Sweet Potatoes | carb · good | - | 11.8 |
| 2 | Carrots | Carrots | veg · good | - | 11.2 |
| 3 | Oat Groats | Oat Groats | carb · good | - | 10.7 |
| 4 | Vegetable Oil | Vegetable oil | oil · medium | - | 10.2 |
| 5 | Brown Rice | Rice - brown / whole grain | carb · medium | - | 9.6 |
| 6 | Peas | Peas | veg · good | - | 9.1 |
| 7 | Tomatoes | Tomato | veg · good | - | 8.6 |
| 8 | Blueberries | Blueberries | veg · good | - | 8.0 |
| 9 | Cranberries | Cranberries | veg · good | - | 7.5 |
| 10 | Brewers Yeast | Brewer's Yeast | supplement · good | - | 7.0 |
| 11 | Dried Kelp | Kelp | veg · good | - | 6.4 |
- 1. Sweet Potato11.8% estimated
- 2. Carrots11.2% estimated
- 3. Oat Groats10.7% estimated
- 4. Vegetable Oil10.2% estimated
- 5. Brown Rice9.6% estimated
- 6. Peas9.1% estimated
- 7. Tomatoes8.6% estimated
- 8. Blueberries8.0% estimated
- 9. Cranberries7.5% estimated
- 10. Brewers Yeast7.0% estimated
- 11. Dried Kelp6.4% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-14
Brand and contact: Benevo
- Website
- https://www.benevo.com/
- Address
- Unit 4 Downley Business Park, 12 Downley Road, Havant, Hampshire, PO9 2NJ
- Contact page
- www.benevo.com
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-14
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.benevo.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves a rating of 53 out of 100 overall. The inclusion of ingredients without printed percentages contributed -10.6 points, while the overall quality of the ingredient list added +7 points. Additionally, the carbohydrate content contributed -4.8 points, and being labelled nutritionally complete added +2.3 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +6.96 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 41.9% | -0.115 | -4.82 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 20.2% | -0.092 | -1.86 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 25.0% | -0.005 | -0.13 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 12.9% | -0.012 | -0.16 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -0.20 | 0.222 | -0.05 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +6.96 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 41.9% | -0.115 | -4.82 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 20.2% | -0.092 | -1.86 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 25.0% | -0.005 | -0.13 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 12.9% | -0.012 | -0.16 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -0.20 | 0.222 | -0.05 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 53.5
- Final score
- 53/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 7 | 29.2 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 2 | 8.3 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 81.7 |
| Fibre | 3 | 12.5 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 43.8 |
Scored over 3 declared nutrients (combined weight 50); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 11 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin A 6610 IU
- Vitamin D3 397 IU
- Manganese (as Manganese Sulphate Monohydrate) 4 mg
- Manganese (as Manganese Chelate of Protein Hydrolysates) 0.4 mg
- Iron (as Iron (II) Sulphate Monohydrate) 40 mg
- Zinc (as Zinc Sulphate Monohydrate) 62 mg
- Zinc (as Zinc Chelate of Protein Hydrolysates) 9 mg
- Copper (as Copper Sulphate (II) Pentahydrate) 4 mg
- Copper (as Copper (II) Chelate of Protein Hydrolysates) 0.6 mg
- Iodine (as Potassium Iodide) 0.8 mg
- Taurine 1250 mg
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
50/100 · limited — 2 checkable claims: 1 consistent, 1 contradicted.
Contradicted by the label
- "No Soya, Wheat Gluten or GM Ingredients" — the declared label says otherwise on grain-free.
Consistent with the label
- "100% Plant-based complete pet food carefully designed to meet and exceed the nutritional requirements of both cats and dogs" — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.
5 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Limited: at least one claim contradicts the declared label, or a recent upheld ASA ruling applies.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blueberries, cranberries and ascorbic acid provide additional nutrition and help support healthy pH levels in urine (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Complete Vegan Food for Cats and Dogs (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Added Taurine, Vitamins and Amino Acids (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Free from Soya, Wheat, Dairy and Eggs, this is an excellent hypoallergenic option for pets suffering from food allergies and sensitivities (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 100% Plant-based complete pet food carefully designed to meet and exceed the nutritional requirements of both cats and dogs (on page) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| No Soya, Wheat Gluten or GM Ingredients (on page) | Free-from | contradicted | Manufacturer assertion |
| Made without meat, fish, dairy, wheat, GM ingredients, artificial colours and artificial flavours (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Duo Vegan Cat and Dog Food
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.