Bakers Senior Chicken with Vegetables Dry Dog Food
Dry Extruded complete Clear label
Is Bakers Senior Chicken with Vegetables Dry Dog Food a good dog food?
We score it 41/100 (Poor). The main reasons are set out in "Why you might not" below, and every step of the calculation is shown under "How we calculated this score".
Why this score?
This recipe achieves an overall score of 41 out of 100 based on several key factors. The carbohydrate content contributed -8.4 points, and the processing format adjusted the score by -7. Additionally, ingredients without printed percentages added -4.9 points, while printing percentages on the label contributed +3.2 to the total calculation.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
37% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
- Recipe41
- Nutritionalmedium94
- Transparency60
- Safety100
- Evidencelimited33
The Recipe score measures how attractive and transparent the declared ingredient list is. It is not, by itself, proof that the food is nutritionally appropriate for long-term feeding. The Nutritional and Evidence scores measure what we can verify towards that stronger claim.
Complete extruded dry food for senior dogs, with cereals, meat and animal derivatives and chicken as the main ingredients.
Why you might choose it
- Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
- Low in fat for its format: 8% fat on a dry-matter basis.
Why you might not
- 5 poor-graded ingredients make up about 23% of the recipe.
- Meat makes up an estimated 3% of the dry matter (9% as fed); carbohydrates dominate.
Estimated composition
Typical analysis (as fed)
- Protein
- 24%
- Fat
- 8%
- Fibre
- 3%
- Ash
- 7%
- Omega-3 fatty acids
- 0.12%
- Omega-6 fatty acids
- 2%
Energy: 335 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A 22000 IU/kg; Vitamin D3 1200 IU/kg; Vitamin E 100 mg/kg; Iron (II) sulphate monohydrate (Fe: 91) mg/kg; Calcium iodate anhydrous (I: 2.2) mg/kg; Copper (II) sulphate pentahydrate (Cu: 10) mg/kg; Manganous sulphate monohydrate (Mn: 6.9) mg/kg; Zinc sulphate monohydrate (Zn: 130) mg/kg; Sodium selenite (Se: 0.22) mg/kg
Feeding guide
Daily feeding guidelines in grams per day: Toy dog 1-5kg: 35-105g; Small dog 5-10kg: 105-165g; Medium dog 10-25kg: 165-310g; Large dog 25-45kg: 310-460g; Giant dog 45-70kg: 460-615g. One half pint mug holds approximately 100g of BAKERS Senior. Adjust according to activity level, physical condition and individual needs. Clean, fresh drinking water should always be available.
Reviews
92 reviews on this product · 4.7/5
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for senior dogs
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists cereals
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (13)
| # | As declared | Matched | Category | Tier | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cereals (55%) | Cereals | carb | poor | 55 | 55.0 |
| 2 | Meat and animal derivatives | Meat and Animal Derivatives | meat | poor | - | 6.8 |
| 3 | 4% chicken | Chicken | meat | medium | 4 | 4.0 |
| 4 | Derivatives of vegetable origin | Vegetable By-Products | other | poor | - | 6.3 |
| 5 | 2.9% dried beet pulp | Beet Pulp | fibre | medium | 2.9 | 2.9 |
| 6 | Oils and fats | Oils and Fats | oil | poor | - | 5.8 |
| 7 | Glycerol | Glycerine | other | medium | - | 5.3 |
| 8 | Vegetable protein extracts | Vegetable protein extracts | carb | poor | - | 4.8 |
| 9 | Minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement | medium | - | 4.4 |
| 10 | Vegetables | Vegetables | veg | medium | - | 3.9 |
| 11 | 0.3% dried pea | Peas | veg | good | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| 12 | 0.3% dried carrot | Carrots | veg | good | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| 13 | Spirulina (0.2%) | Spirulina | veg | good | 0.2 | 0.2 |
Brand
- Phone
- 0800 212 161
- Contact page
- www.purina.co.uk
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-08-31
- Scored with
- Model v2 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.purina.co.uk
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Scored with model v2 on 2026-09-22. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.3 | 9.915 | +3.07 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 3.4% | 0.116 | +0.39 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 74.9% | -0.113 | -8.44 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 5.8% | -0.088 | -0.51 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 4.3% | -0.009 | -0.04 |
| Other share of dry matter | 5.9% | -0.371 | -2.19 |
| Recipe graded poor | 23.4% | -0.045 | -1.05 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 5.0% | -0.182 | -0.92 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 5 | -0.868 | -4.34 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 5.3% | 0.056 | +0.30 |
| Undeclared quantities | 37.3% | -0.131 | -4.88 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | yes | 3.194 | +3.19 |
| Complete diet | yes | 1.703 | +1.70 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -1.988 | -1.99 |
| High carb and low meat | yes | -1.250 | -1.25 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 3.4 | -0.073 | -0.25 |
| Additive penalty | -0.63 | 0.236 | -0.15 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.996 | -7.00 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.3 | 9.915 | +3.07 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 3.4% | 0.116 | +0.39 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 74.9% | -0.113 | -8.44 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 5.8% | -0.088 | -0.51 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 2.2% | -0.002 | -0.00 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.177 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 4.3% | -0.009 | -0.04 |
| Other share of dry matter | 5.9% | -0.371 | -2.19 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.022 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 23.4% | -0.045 | -1.05 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 5.0% | -0.182 | -0.92 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 5 | -0.868 | -4.34 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 5.3% | 0.056 | +0.30 |
| Undeclared quantities | 37.3% | -0.131 | -4.88 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | yes | 3.194 | +3.19 |
| Complete diet | yes | 1.703 | +1.70 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 11.440 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | -0.506 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -1.988 | -1.99 |
| High carb and low meat | yes | -1.250 | -1.25 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 3.4 | -0.073 | -0.25 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | -0.339 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 16.475 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -0.63 | 0.236 | -0.15 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Processing: Raw | no | 13.322 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | 7.712 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | 6.583 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 4.857 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | 0.072 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 11.127 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 9.320 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | 4.569 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -2.321 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.996 | -7.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.833 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.711 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | 2.935 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | 2.292 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.01
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 41.3
- Final score
- 41/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
| Model | Score | |
|---|---|---|
| v2 | 41/100 | current |
| v1 | 42/100 |
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 24 | 26.1 (band 18 to 40%) | 92.1 |
| Fat | 8 | 8.7 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 83.2 |
| Fibre | 3 | 3.3 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3) | - | - | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 335 | 364.1 | 100 |
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.
Scored over 5 declared nutrients (combined weight 70); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 8% from the food type.
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (62.7% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 12.5/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The marketing claims made on the pack and product page, and how much evidence sits behind them. We record the claims as stated; we do not assess whether they are true.
| Claim | Type | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|
| Recipe using superfoods. With Natural Spirulina Algae, known for its beneficial impact on intestinal health (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| With beet pulp, a source of both insoluble and soluble fibres to help support healthy digestion (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Added quality protein to help support muscle strength (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Vitamin D & Minerals for healthy teeth and strong bones (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Vitamin A & Zinc to help support healthy skin & coat (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| No Colorants (on page) | Free-from | Manufacturer assertion |
| Chicken with Vegetables (on page) | Content | Manufacturer assertion |
| 100% complete pet food for senior dogs above 7 years (on page) | Content | Manufacturer assertion |
| Made with Selected Natural Ingredients (on page) | Content | Manufacturer assertion |
| Lower in fat to help prevent weight gain (on page) | High/low level | Manufacturer assertion |
Limited: at least one claim rests on manufacturer assertion alone.
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Other products from Bakers
Alternatives to Senior Chicken with Vegetables Dry Dog Food
Foods in our database that are similar on ingredients, protein, format or price. Scores and figures are from the same deterministic model used everywhere on the site.
Community
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.