Our verdict
Is Bakers Chicken with Vegetables a good dog food?
We score it 38/100 (Poor). The main reasons are set out in "Why you might not" below, and every step of the calculation is shown under "How we calculated this score".
Complete extruded dry food for adult dogs, with cereals, meat and animal derivatives and chicken as the main ingredients.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
34% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Labelling or feeding guide is aimed at small dogs
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists cereals
- You need more protein than this: 20.0% on a dry-matter basis is in the low band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 20% · Fat 10%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 20% |
| Fat | 10% |
| Fibre | 3% |
| Ash | 7% |
| Omega-3 fatty acids | 0.14% |
| Omega-6 fatty acids | 2.40% |
Energy: 343 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
Daily feeding guidelines in grams per day: Toy dog (1-5kg): 40-120 g/day; Small Dog (5-10kg): 120-190 g/day; Medium (10-25kg): 190-345 g/day; Large (25-45kg): 345-515 g/day; Giant (45-70kg): 515-690 g/day. One half pint mug holds approximately 100g of BAKERS. To help keep your dog in an optimal body condition, adjust according to your dog's activity level, physical condition and individual needs. Clean, fresh drinking water should always be available.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A 17500 IU/kg; Vitamin D3 1000 IU/kg; Vitamin E 83 mg/kg; Iron (II) sulphate monohydrate (Fe: 72) mg/kg; Calcium iodate anhydrous (I: 1.8) mg/kg; Copper (II) sulphate pentahydrate (Cu: 8.0) mg/kg; Manganous sulphate monohydrate (Mn: 5.5) mg/kg; Zinc sulphate monohydrate (Zn: 100) mg/kg; Sodium selenite (Se: 0.17) mg/kg
Technological additives
Antioxidants
Ingredients (10)34% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- carb 69.1%
- meat 9.7%
- other 9.7%
- oil 4.8%
- supplement 3.5%
- fibre 2.9%
- veg 0.2%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cereals (59%) | Cereals | carb · poor | 59 | 59.0 |
| 2 | Meat and animal derivatives | Meat and Animal Derivatives | meat · poor | - | 7.1 |
| 3 | 4% chicken | Chicken | meat · medium | 4 | 4.0 |
| 4 | Derivatives of vegetable origin | Vegetable By-Products | other · poor | - | 6.5 |
| 5 | 2.9% dried beet pulp | Beet Pulp | fibre · medium | 2.9 | 2.9 |
| 6 | Oils and fats | Oils and Fats | oil · poor | - | 5.9 |
| 7 | Glycerol | Glycerine | other · medium | - | 5.4 |
| 8 | Vegetable protein extracts | Vegetable protein extracts | carb · poor | - | 4.8 |
| 9 | Minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 4.2 |
| 10 | Spirulina (0.2%) | Spirulina | veg · good | 0.2 | 0.2 |
- 1. Cereals (59%)59% declared59.0% estimated
- 2. Meat and animal derivatives7.1% estimated
- 3. 4% chicken4% declared4.0% estimated
- 4. Derivatives of vegetable origin6.5% estimated
- 5. 2.9% dried beet pulp2.9% declared2.9% estimated
- 6. Oils and fats5.9% estimated
- 7. Glycerol5.4% estimated
- 8. Vegetable protein extracts4.8% estimated
- 9. Minerals4.2% estimated
- 10. Spirulina (0.2%)0.2% declared0.2% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-15
Brand and contact: Bakers
- Phone
- 0800 212 161
- Contact page
- www.purina.co.uk
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-15
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.purina.co.uk
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
84 reviews on this product · 4.7/5
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves an overall rating of 38 out of 100. The score is influenced by several elements, beginning with the carbohydrate content which contributes -8.8 to the total. Additionally, the processing format accounts for -6.7, while ingredients without printed percentages add -3.6. Conversely, the overall quality of the ingredient list lifts the result by +2.7.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.3 | 9.191 | +2.69 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 1.4% | 0.096 | +0.14 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 76.8% | -0.115 | -8.84 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 6.1% | -0.092 | -0.56 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 4.1% | -0.012 | -0.05 |
| Other share of dry matter | 6.1% | -0.375 | -2.29 |
| Recipe graded poor | 26.0% | -0.065 | -1.69 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 5.7% | -0.179 | -1.02 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 5 | -0.876 | -4.38 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 6.2% | 0.060 | +0.37 |
| Undeclared quantities | 33.9% | -0.106 | -3.58 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | yes | -1.180 | -1.18 |
| Additive penalty | -0.70 | 0.222 | -0.15 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.3 | 9.191 | +2.69 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 1.4% | 0.096 | +0.14 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 76.8% | -0.115 | -8.84 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 6.1% | -0.092 | -0.56 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 0.2% | -0.005 | -0.00 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 4.1% | -0.012 | -0.05 |
| Other share of dry matter | 6.1% | -0.375 | -2.29 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 26.0% | -0.065 | -1.69 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 5.7% | -0.179 | -1.02 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 5 | -0.876 | -4.38 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 6.2% | 0.060 | +0.37 |
| Undeclared quantities | 33.9% | -0.106 | -3.58 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | yes | -1.180 | -1.18 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -0.70 | 0.222 | -0.15 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 37.9
- Final score
- 38/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 20 | 22.1 (band 18 to 40%) | 81.2 |
| Fat | 10 | 11 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 93 |
| Fibre | 3 | 3.3 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3) | - | - | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 343 | 379 | 100 |
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.
Scored over 5 declared nutrients (combined weight 70); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.
Declared fortification: 9 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin A 17500 IU/kg
- Vitamin D3 1000 IU/kg
- Vitamin E 83 mg/kg
- Iron (II) sulphate monohydrate (Fe: 72) mg/kg
- Calcium iodate anhydrous (I: 1.8) mg/kg
- Copper (II) sulphate pentahydrate (Cu: 8.0) mg/kg
- Manganous sulphate monohydrate (Mn: 5.5) mg/kg
- Zinc sulphate monohydrate (Zn: 100) mg/kg
- Sodium selenite (Se: 0.17) mg/kg
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (66.1% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 13.2/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "100% complete perfect nutritional balance for all your dog's daily needs" — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.
9 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| With Natural Spirulina Algae, known for its beneficial impact on intestinal health (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| With beet pulp, a source of both insoluble and soluble fibres to help support healthy digestion (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Antioxidants to help support natural defences (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Added quality protein to help support muscle strength (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Vitamin D & Minerals for healthy teeth and strong bones (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Vitamin A & Zinc to help support healthy skin & coat (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| No Colorants (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Made with Selected Natural Ingredients (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Recipe using superfoods (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 100% complete perfect nutritional balance for all your dog's daily needs (on page) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Chicken with Vegetables
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.