Bakers Meaty Meals Small Dog Beef

Dry Extruded · completeClear label

Meaty Meals Small Dog Beef
Poor
our rating

Our verdict

Is Bakers Meaty Meals Small Dog Beef a good dog food?

We score it 30/100 (Poor). The main reasons are set out in "Why you might not" below, and every step of the calculation is shown under "How we calculated this score".

Complete extruded dry food for adult dogs, with cereals, meat and animal derivatives and beef as the main ingredients.

How we score

60% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

Why you might choose it

  • Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
  • Declares energy content, which most labels omit.
  • Nutritionally complete: formulated to be fed as the whole diet.

Why you might not

  • 5 poor-graded ingredients make up about 44% of the recipe.
  • Meat makes up an estimated 5% of the dry matter (14% as fed); carbohydrates dominate.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
  • Labelling or feeding guide is aimed at small dogs
  • Doesn't list chicken, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids beef: the label lists beef
  • Your dog avoids grain: the label lists cereals

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 25% · Fat 12%

Typical analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fed
Protein25%
Fat12%
Fibre2.50%
Ash9%
Moisture15%

Energy: 337 kcal/100g

Additives & feeding info

Feeding and storage

Feeding guide

Toy dog (1-5kg): 40-120 g/day; Small Dog (5-10kg): 120-195 g/day. One half pint mug holds approximately 100g. Adjust according to activity level, physical condition and individual needs. Clean, fresh drinking water should always be available.

Additives declared on the label

Nutritional additives

Vitamin A 19000 IU/kg; Vitamin D3 1100 IU/kg; Vitamin E 90 IU/kg; Iron (II) sulphate monohydrate (Fe: 78) mg/kg; Calcium iodate anhydrous (I: 1.9) mg/kg; Copper (II) sulphate pentahydrate (Cu: 8.7) mg/kg; Manganous sulphate monohydrate (Mn: 5.9) mg/kg; Zinc sulphate monohydrate (Zn: 110) mg/kg; Sodium selenite (Se: 0.19) mg/kg

Technological additives

Antioxidants

Ingredients (8)60% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

  • carb 56.3%
  • other 14.8%
  • meat 14.1%
  • oil 7.8%
  • supplement 7.0%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
1Cereals (36%)Cerealscarb · poor3636.0
2Meat and animal derivativesMeat and Animal Derivativesmeat · poor-12.6
34% beefBeefmeat · medium44.0
4Vegetable protein extractsVegetable protein extractscarb · poor-11.6
5GlycerolGlycerineother · medium-10.5
6Oils and fatsOils and Fatsoil · poor-9.5
7MineralsVitamins and mineralssupplement · medium-8.4
8Derivatives of vegetable originVegetable By-Productsother · poor-7.4
  1. 1. Cereals (36%)36% declared36.0% estimated
    Cereals · carb · poor
  2. 2. Meat and animal derivatives12.6% estimated
  3. 3. 4% beef4% declared4.0% estimated
    Beef · meat · medium
  4. 4. Vegetable protein extracts11.6% estimated
  5. 5. Glycerol10.5% estimated
    Glycerine · other · medium
  6. 6. Oils and fats9.5% estimated
    Oils and Fats · oil · poor
  7. 7. Minerals8.4% estimated
    Vitamins and minerals · supplement · medium
  8. 8. Derivatives of vegetable origin7.4% estimated
    Vegetable By-Products · other · poor

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-15

Brand and contact: Bakers

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-15
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)
Product page
www.purina.co.uk

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.

67 reviews on this product · 4.7/5

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Why this score?

The overall score is 30 out of 100. The carbohydrate content contributed -7.6 points, and the processing format contributed -6.7 points. Ingredients without printed percentages contributed -6.3 points, while the remaining ingredients contributed -3.7 points.

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality-0.09.191-0.42
Meat share of dry matter1.5%0.096+0.14
Carb share of dry matter66.0%-0.115-7.59
Oil share of dry matter10.3%-0.092-0.95
Supplement share of dry matter8.6%-0.012-0.10
Other share of dry matter9.9%-0.375-3.70
Recipe graded poor44.4%-0.065-2.89
Poor-quality meat in recipe10.1%-0.179-1.81
Number of poor ingredients5-0.876-4.38
Largest single poor ingredient10.9%0.060+0.65
Undeclared quantities60.0%-0.106-6.33
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
High carb and low meatyes-1.180-1.18
Additive penalty-1.370.222-0.30
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality-0.09.191-0.42
Meat share of dry matter1.5%0.096+0.14
Carb share of dry matter66.0%-0.115-7.59
Oil share of dry matter10.3%-0.092-0.95
Vegetable share of dry matter0.0%-0.005+0.00
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.163+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter8.6%-0.012-0.10
Other share of dry matter9.9%-0.375-3.70
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.027+0.00
Recipe graded poor44.4%-0.065-2.89
Poor-quality meat in recipe10.1%-0.179-1.81
Number of poor ingredients5-0.876-4.38
Largest single poor ingredient10.9%0.060+0.65
Undeclared quantities60.0%-0.106-6.33
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)no0.707+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
High carb and low meatyes-1.180-1.18
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty-1.370.222-0.30
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
+0.02
Additives declared on label
+2 transparency bonus
Subtotal
29.6
Final score
30/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v330/100current
v233/100
v132/100
v1.923/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein2529.4 (band 18 to 40%)100
Fat1214.1 (band 5.5 to 20%)100
Fibre2.52.9 (band 0.5 to 5%)100
Energy (kcal/100g)337396.5100

Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.

Declared fortification: 9 nutritional additives on the label
  • Vitamin A 19000 IU/kg
  • Vitamin D3 1100 IU/kg
  • Vitamin E 90 IU/kg
  • Iron (II) sulphate monohydrate (Fe: 78) mg/kg
  • Calcium iodate anhydrous (I: 1.9) mg/kg
  • Copper (II) sulphate pentahydrate (Cu: 8.7) mg/kg
  • Manganous sulphate monohydrate (Mn: 5.9) mg/kg
  • Zinc sulphate monohydrate (Zn: 110) mg/kg
  • Sodium selenite (Se: 0.19) mg/kg

Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (40% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)8/20
✓ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory)15/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)10/10
✓ Energy value declared (voluntary)5/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✓ Feeding guidance given (mandatory)10/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

Claims on file; none we can check against the label

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
Antioxidants to help support natural defences (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Added quality protein to help support muscle strength (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Vitamin D & Minerals for healthy teeth and strong bones (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Vitamin A & Zinc to help support healthy skin & coat (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
with tasty beef (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
No Colorants (on page)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Alternatives to Meaty Meals Small Dog Beef

Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.

See all alternatives

See all products from Bakers

Community0 comments

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.